2017-2018 NBA Season

[ratboy]

Walang technically na mali dahil existing yun rule eh. Allowed sila na gawin eh, That's the point of the rule. Kung ni-review nila kung nasa restricted or not, review na rin nila yun tawag nila.

Diba meron earlier sa Game or sa Houston yun na yun 3 points ni klay, ni-reverse din nila ginawa nilang 2 pointer lang.

Si Jeff van gundy pala yun analyst, former NBA head coach Alam niya meron ganun rule. So it means existing and pwedeng utilized ng mga referees

So if you want to be technical about it. Kahit saan makarating walang mali sa ginawa mga referees. Sinunod naman nila yun rule.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Eto yung sinasabe specific kasi ito for the charging/blocking call. Yung sinasabi mo na kay klay eh generally yan na under 2 minutes review, Pero pag charging at blocking meron specific rule talaga para diyan eto oh:

Restricted Area Block/Charge

Since the 2012-13 season, referees have reviewed all block/charge calls when they are not reasonably certain as to whether the defender was inside or outside of the restricted area. For more information about what constitutes a block or a charge. Restricted area replays are conducted only during the last two minutes of the fourth period and during all of overtime.

When conducting their review, referees attempt to confirm or overturn their original call.

The call is deemed a block if referees deem the defender was:
- Not in a legal guarding position, or
- In a legal guarding position, but inside the restricted area
- The call is deemed a charge if the defender was in a legal guarding position and outside the restricted area.
- Referees also determine if any unsportsmanlike acts or unnecessary contact occurred."

"- the initial review has to be whether he’s in the restricted zone or not, and only from there they can determine if it’s a block or a charge. The issue Cavs fan and Ty Lue have is that there was no reason to review whether he was in the restricted zone, and so by the book the block/charge shouldn’t have been reviewed at all."

Eh klarong klaro nga na outside naman restricted kaya hindi dapat marereview technically, at kung ireview man yung position pa lang muna tapos nung klaro na sa review na outside restricted zone eh putol na dapat yun at hindi overturn, but ang nangyare tinuloy tuloy pa na overturn. nagkunwari na lang in doubt at conflict sa restricted area whether due to incompetence or luto eh both are unacceptable, grabe tuloy naging backlash ngayon sa officiating. Bukod sa jr smith blunder eh ito officiating pa dahilan bakit masama loob at di magkatulog mga fans..haha

[Juan Martinez]

According to my Briton boss kasi "game of the monkeys" ang NBA.

and what does he mean by that-- a racial slur?

[Juan Martinez]

_______________

[shadow]

Eto yung sinasabe specific kasi ito for the charging/blocking call. Yung sinasabi mo na kay klay eh generally yan na under 2 minutes review, Pero pag charging at blocking meron specific rule talaga para diyan eto oh:

Restricted Area Block/Charge

Since the 2012-13 season, referees have reviewed all block/charge calls when they are not reasonably certain as to whether the defender was inside or outside of the restricted area. For more information about what constitutes a block or a charge. Restricted area replays are conducted only during the last two minutes of the fourth period and during all of overtime.

When conducting their review, referees attempt to confirm or overturn their original call.

The call is deemed a block if referees deem the defender was:
- Not in a legal guarding position, or
- In a legal guarding position, but inside the restricted area
- The call is deemed a charge if the defender was in a legal guarding position and outside the restricted area.
- Referees also determine if any unsportsmanlike acts or unnecessary contact occurred."

"- the initial review has to be whether he’s in the restricted zone or not, and only from there they can determine if it’s a block or a charge. The issue Cavs fan and Ty Lue have is that there was no reason to review whether he was in the restricted zone, and so by the book the block/charge shouldn’t have been reviewed at all."

Eh klarong klaro nga na outside naman restricted kaya hindi dapat marereview technically, at kung ireview man yung position pa lang muna tapos nung klaro na sa review na outside restricted zone eh putol na dapat yun at hindi overturn, but ang nangyare tinuloy tuloy pa na overturn. nagkunwari na lang in doubt at conflict sa restricted area whether due to incompetence or luto eh both are unacceptable, grabe tuloy naging backlash ngayon sa officiating. Bukod sa jr smith blunder eh ito officiating pa dahilan bakit masama loob at di magkatulog mga fans..haha

Oh tama naman ah. Referees can review kung nasa restricted area or not then they can change their calla based on that and sa guarding position..Yun naman ang ginawa nila eh.

Yun sinasabi mo na kitang kita. Iba kasi point of view mo, iba sa referees, iba sa players, iba sa coaches. Depende kung nasaan ka During that play.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

[Ketib]

and what does he mean by that-- a racial slur?

He always did, I heard also "****ing Filipinos".

[ratboy]

Oh tama naman ah. Referees can review kung nasa restricted area or not then they can change their calla based on that and sa guarding position..Yun naman ang ginawa nila eh.

Yun sinasabi mo na kitang kita. Iba kasi point of view mo, iba sa referees, iba sa players, iba sa coaches. Depende kung nasaan ka During that play.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Yun na nga bottomline kung iba man point of view, pero fact remains na wala sa restricted so either incompetence of referee or luto both are way unacceptable in finals na maaring nag cost ng championship.

At sabi nga kung talagang in conflict at doubt position lang muna review hindi dapat tuloy tuloy na overturn, eh nakita na nga sa review na tama ang pwesto outside of restricted area na, bakit biglang dinerecho pa sa overturn. Kaya talagang napakamot ulo na lang na sa officiating

[Juan Martinez]

Eto yung sinasabe specific kasi ito for the charging/blocking call. Yung sinasabi mo na kay klay eh generally yan na under 2 minutes review, Pero pag charging at blocking meron specific rule talaga para diyan eto oh:

Restricted Area Block/Charge

Since the 2012-13 season, referees have reviewed all block/charge calls when they are not reasonably certain as to whether the defender was inside or outside of the restricted area. For more information about what constitutes a block or a charge. Restricted area replays are conducted only during the last two minutes of the fourth period and during all of overtime.

When conducting their review, referees attempt to confirm or overturn their original call.

The call is deemed a block if referees deem the defender was:
- Not in a legal guarding position, or
- In a legal guarding position, but inside the restricted area
- The call is deemed a charge if the defender was in a legal guarding position and outside the restricted area.
- Referees also determine if any unsportsmanlike acts or unnecessary contact occurred."

"- the initial review has to be whether he’s in the restricted zone or not, and only from there they can determine if it’s a block or a charge. The issue Cavs fan and Ty Lue have is that there was no reason to review whether he was in the restricted zone, and so by the book the block/charge shouldn’t have been reviewed at all."

Eh klarong klaro nga na outside naman restricted kaya hindi dapat marereview technically, at kung ireview man yung position pa lang muna tapos nung klaro na sa review na outside restricted zone eh putol na dapat yun at hindi overturn, but ang nangyare tinuloy tuloy pa na overturn. nagkunwari na lang in doubt at conflict sa restricted area whether due to incompetence or luto eh both are unacceptable, grabe tuloy naging backlash ngayon sa officiating. Bukod sa jr smith blunder eh ito officiating pa dahilan bakit masama loob at di magkatulog mga fans..haha

move on...

[rukawa11]

According to my Briton boss kasi "game of the monkeys" ang NBA.

Negrong mukhang unggoy nanaglalambitin ba brad? Haha hala racist, juice ko day paabot ��(grin)

[StockEngine]

sarap ng rerun on btv.. 4Q na [emoji16]

FOCUS

[shadow]

Yun na nga bottomline kung iba man point of view, pero fact remains na wala sa restricted so either incompetence of referee or luto both are way unacceptable in finals na maaring nag cost ng championship.

At sabi nga kung talagang in conflict at doubt position lang muna review hindi dapat tuloy tuloy na overturn, eh nakita na nga sa review na tama ang pwesto outside of restricted area na, bakit biglang dinerecho pa sa overturn. Kaya talagang napakamot ulo na lang na sa officiating

Panoorin mo nga ulit yun clip. Ang tawag yun nasa baseline na referee. Baka meron nakaraang na Player sa line of sight niya. Kaya yun pag tawag niya ng charging sabi ni Jeff van gundy, parang tumingin siya sa isa pang referee ewan ko kung blocking naman tawag nun isa. Kaya conflict and they have to review. Now na review nila wala sa restricted Area si james so now pwede na nila confirm kung tama ang tawag.

Eh bakit pinipilit mo na dapat yun restricted Area lang ang dapat nila review eh nasa rules nga na pwede nilang isabay pati yun tawag kung tama or mali.

The point is the rules na pwede nilang gawin.

Ikaw na lang magsabi ang be honest, since we have the luxury of replays.

Diba gumagalaw pa si James and naka side siya tapos yun shoulder niya ang pinatama niya?

Kahit ako during live action. Offensive foul ang tingin ko but Upon checking the replays, blocking talaga eh.

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

[ratboy]

Panoorin mo nga ulit yun clip. Ang tawag yun nasa baseline na referee. Baka meron nakaraang na Player sa line of sight niya. Kaya yun pag tawag niya ng charging sabi ni Jeff van gundy, parang tumingin siya sa isa pang referee ewan ko kung blocking naman tawag nun isa. Kaya conflict and they have to review. Now na review nila wala sa restricted Area si james so now pwede na nila confirm kung tama ang tawag.

Eh bakit pinipilit mo na dapat yun restricted Area lang ang dapat nila review eh nasa rules nga na pwede nilang isabay pati yun tawag kung tama or mali.

The point is the rules na pwede nilang gawin.

Ikaw na lang magsabi ang be honest, since we have the luxury of replays.

Diba gumagalaw pa si James and naka side siya tapos yun shoulder niya ang pinatama niya?

Kahit ako during live action. Offensive foul ang tingin ko but Upon checking the replays, blocking talaga eh.

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Hindi na natin kasalanan yun kung may nakaharang at nagkalituhan sila dahil sa incompetence na nila yun. Kaya nga simulat sapul mali na talaga kung dahil nagkamali sila ng tawag or nanluto sila.

At kahit pagbigyan natin sila na may conflict sila eh mali pa rin, strike 2 na dahil nga may initial review pa hindi basta tuloy tuloy sa overturn titignan lang muna dapat position at klarong klaro na nga sa review na ang layo sa restricted. I quote again: "the initial review has to be whether he’s in the restricted zone or not, and only from there they can determine if it’s a block or a charge. The issue Cavs fan and Ty Lue have is that there was no reason to review whether he was in the restricted zone, and so by the book the block/charge shouldn’t have been reviewed at all."

[shadow]

Hindi na natin kasalanan yun kung may nakaharang at nagkalituhan sila dahil sa incompetence na nila yun. Kaya nga simulat sapul mali na talaga kung dahil nagkamali sila ng tawag or nanluto sila.

At kahit pagbigyan natin sila na may conflict sila eh mali pa rin, strike 2 na dahil nga may initial review pa hindi basta tuloy tuloy sa overturn titignan lang muna dapat position at klarong klaro na nga sa review na ang layo sa restricted. I quote again: "the initial review has to be whether he’s in the restricted zone or not, and only from there they can determine if it’s a block or a charge. The issue Cavs fan and Ty Lue have is that there was no reason to review whether he was in the restricted zone, and so by the book the block/charge shouldn’t have been reviewed at all."

Ang linaw ng QUOTE mo oh. Initial review kung nasa restricted area or not ginawa naman nila, na review na nila wala sa restricted Area now check nila yun tawag nila kung tama or mali.

Opinion ni lue yun and cav Fans na dapat no reason to review, pag fans ng GSW iba rin Opinion. Kaya meron rules para hinde mag based sa opinions.

The facts are. It's in the rules, they followed the rules, they have to live with it.

Ikaw ano Opinion mo? Ngayon nakita mo na yun replay. Offensive or not?
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

[Ry_Tower]

Hirap talaga paliwanagan ang OA at bitter. Hehehe

Ang kulit. Makulit pa sa kulot kung pamangkin.

Sent from my LG-H990 using Tapatalk

[ChoyJo]

Kapag nahimasmasan yan magbabago na din isip nyan.. Tyaga ni Shadow mag-explain pero parang hindi iniintindi eh.. Move On na.. Sa Game 2 na tayo.. Gusto ko ata ulit sa CAVS.. Ng dahil sa game 1 mukhang tempting yung +12.... Kaso scripted na..lol

[99moves]

Kapag nahimasmasan yan magbabago na din isip nyan.. Tyaga ni Shadow mag-explain pero parang hindi iniintindi eh.. Move On na.. Sa Game 2 na tayo.. Gusto ko ata ulit sa CAVS.. Ng dahil sa game 1 mukhang tempting yung +12.... Kaso scripted na..lol

pusta ka na. babawi si jr smith. sigurado sinabon ni lebron yun pati si george hill.

[99moves]

Sa unang tingin offensive talaga but kung panoorin mo ulit gumagalaw talaga Then naka side siya yun shoulder niya ang pinatama niya Instead na dapat Full frontal ang tama sa kanya. Parang ginagawa ni Tenerio dito.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

it can still be a charge even if the defender is moving as long as he's already in position. for me james was already in position but it's very close that it could go either way.

panget talaga dito yung replay/review. in the past that call would have stayed as a charge as there is a flow/momentum of the game and the refs are part of it because they know when they messed up and when to make "make-up" calls. there were a lot of bad calls against the cavs in the game and this call would have been awarded to the cavs in order to balance out those previous bad calls. kaya charge ang initial na tawag eh.

[ray_noel]

🤣 goodluck sa game 2... 2-0 na yan... let’s go warriors!!! Clap clap clap clap clap


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

[montro]

Right lets moved on sa game 2. Besides game 1 is still far to the finishing line.[emoji626][emoji23]

Sent from my iPhone X using Tapatalk

[Ry_Tower]

Kapag nahimasmasan yan magbabago na din isip nyan.. Tyaga ni Shadow mag-explain pero parang hindi iniintindi eh.. Move On na.. Sa Game 2 na tayo.. Gusto ko ata ulit sa CAVS.. Ng dahil sa game 1 mukhang tempting yung +12.... Kaso scripted na..lol

Pusta ka na kung plus 12. Sa plus 5 nga dami na nanalo eh. Pero baka hindi na yan plus 12. Dikit e.

Kabahan yan sila sa comeback ni JR Smith at George Hill. Imho kapag sa gm2 hindi natinag (although sa interview ni mukhang sobrang demoralized eh) yang dalawang yan. Pwede maging rallying point ang gm2 para sa Cavs. Yun ang nakakatakot para sa GSW.

🤣 goodluck sa game 2... 2-0 na yan... let’s go warriors!!! Clap clap clap clap clap


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Right lets moved on sa game 2. Besides game 1 is still far to the finishing line.[emoji626][emoji23]

Sent from my iPhone X using Tapatalk

Oo let us move on.

Sent from my LG-H990 using Tapatalk

[shadow]

it can still be a charge even if the defender is moving as long as he's already in position. for me james was already in position but it's very close that it could go either way.

panget talaga dito yung replay/review. in the past that call would have stayed as a charge as there is a flow/momentum of the game and the refs are part of it because they know when they messed up and when to make "make-up" calls. there were a lot of bad calls against the cavs in the game and this call would have been awarded to the cavs in order to balance out those previous bad calls. kaya charge ang initial na tawag eh.

Hindi na natin kasalanan yun kung may nakaharang at nagkalituhan sila dahil sa incompetence na nila yun. Kaya nga simulat sapul mali na talaga kung dahil nagkamali sila ng tawag or nanluto sila.

At kahit pagbigyan natin sila na may conflict sila eh mali pa rin, strike 2 na dahil nga may initial review pa hindi basta tuloy tuloy sa overturn titignan lang muna dapat position at klarong klaro na nga sa review na ang layo sa restricted. I quote again: "the initial review has to be whether he’s in the restricted zone or not, and only from there they can determine if it’s a block or a charge. The issue Cavs fan and Ty Lue have is that there was no reason to review whether he was in the restricted zone, and so by the book the block/charge shouldn’t have been reviewed at all."

NBA Missed Draymond Green Lane Violation, Defends LeBron James Blocking Call | Bleacher Report | Latest News, Videos and Highlights

Ayan na ang L2M Report.

Tapos ang usapan. No NBA-MAFIA conspiracy. [emoji23]

Pero yun pamilya ni JR Smith na-hostage talaga pero balita ko sabi ng Alien eh released na daw dahil sa ginawa niya.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk