Water as Fuel / HHO Technology [Merged Threads]

[CoDer]

HHO is produced by spliting H2O. How it is done? I have no idea.

The best part of this technology is, when you burn the HHO gas it turns bak into water. That is a perfect green technology!

But it would be more than 10 years before we can get an affordable comercial form of this technology into our cars.

[mazdamazda]

HHO is produced by spliting H2O. How it is done? I have no idea.

I've just finished re-reading the articles... and it does get weirder!

What they are proposing in their electrolysis process is that they are able to get H2, H (monoatomic!!!) & 02.

AFAIK... creation of a monoatomic Hydrogen can only be done on really low temperatures since it is very unstable.

[CoDer]

What they are proposing in their electrolysis process is that they are able to get H2, H (monoatomic!!!) & 02.

AFAIK... creation of a monoatomic Hydrogen can only be done on really low temperatures since it is very unstable.

Oh bother... Is that some form of kryptonite?

[mazdamazda]

Oh bother... Is that some form of kryptonite?

oh wait... they retracted their initial theory...

It now seems more clear; Brown's Gas is just 'expanded water molecules'. Brown's Gas is too heavy to be mon-atomic, it is even too heavy to be di-atomic; but it is exactly the right weight to be water-gas (di-hydrogen oxide in gaseous form).

I currently think that Brown's Gas is water and that it is water that has absorbed electricity like a sponge absorbs water. I think that the atomic bonds are NOT broken, so Brown's Gas is STILL WATER; just in a high energy gaseous form that is NOT steam.

expanded water molecules? hmmmmmmmm...

[CoDer]

just in a high energy gaseous form that is NOT steam.

Hehehe... Anong klaseng gas kaya yan?

[ghosthunter]

oh wait... they retracted their initial theory...

expanded water molecules? hmmmmmmmm...

Must be related to PI-Water.

[ghosthunter]

HHO is produced by spliting H2O. How it is done? I have no idea.

When you split H2O (water), you get H2 & O2 and not HHO. There is no such thing as HHO.

The best part of this technology is, when you burn the HHO gas it turns bak into water. That is a perfect green technology!

But it would be more than 10 years before we can get an affordable comercial form of this technology into our cars.

You missed one very vital thing. In a ideal world, the energy you get from "burning" H2 & O2 should be the same to split H2O. But in the real world, you have to deal with entropy, frictional losses and system inefficiencies.

As a system to power anything by itself, it will never happen. The proposed system is like trying to make a perpetual motion machine.

[CoDer]

You missed one very vital thing. In a ideal world, the energy you get from "burning" H2 & O2 should be the same to split H2O. But in the real world, you have to deal with entropy, frictional losses and system inefficiencies.

As a system to power anything by itself, it will never happen. The proposed system is like trying to make a perpetual motion machine.

Nope, I don't.

Maybe I just sounded that I believe in the technology at point blank. I never even tried to explain it because I'm not qualified, all the more in debunking it.

I'm not that stupid, and I'm not that arrogant either. It's just that maybe we have something here, give it 20 years or more.

It's not my money.

[ghosthunter]

Nope, I don't.

Then how do you propose a purely "water powered machine" (car, blender, whatever) would work? How will it overcome entropy?

Maybe I just sounded that I believe in the technology at point blank. I never even tried to explain it because I'm not qualified, all the more in debunking it.

Given the effort you are giving to support your "theory", it seems that you know something we don't. Or maybe you are simply covering up for something else?

If you say it works, give us something concrete that supports your "theory".

I'm not that stupid,

...could have fooled me.

... and I'm not that arrogant either.

that remains to be proven.

It's just that maybe we have something here, give it 20 years or more.

LOL!... at first he mentions 10 years for this "technology" to mature ... and now he mentions 20 years. It seems you have no faith for your own "theory".

[ghosthunter]

...because I'm not qualified, all the more in debunking it.

So what are you QUALIFIED for? You can't debunk nor can you support your own theory. So what are you supporting in this discussion thread?

[CoDer]

So what are you QUALIFIED for? You can't debunk nor can you support your own theory. So what are you supporting in this discussion thread?

Bwhahahahahaaa... Oh my, I sudenly became Klein.

My own theory?
car, blender, or whatever?
Qualification?

Are you crazy or something moderator?

My own theory... oh my...

[ghosthunter]

Bwhahahahahaaa... Oh my, I sudenly became Klein.

My own theory?
car, blender, or whatever?
Qualification?

Are you crazy or something moderator?

My own theory... oh my...

You are just avoiding to answer my challenges to you.

[CoDer]

You are just avoiding to answer my challenges to you.

Hehehehe... Honestly bossing, take that challenge somewhere else. We're no scientist here and that includes you.