http://video.google.com/videoplay?do...35117048624484
Is US a great hoax maker?
http://video.google.com/videoplay?do...35117048624484
Is US a great hoax maker?
Last edited by mazdamazda; May 25th, 2007 at 07:50 PM.
From what I've seen and heard, explosives were planted in the buildings that allowed the buildings to collapse.
Ask yourself: What are the chances that a great building that was designed NOT to fall even if a plane crashed into it will fall, and what are the chances that its TWIN building will do the same?
Get your flame suit on bro...it won't be cool in here!
Very convincing videos. US must answer this hoax making issues. Regarding the moon issue and Area 51 of the military, maybe that was Universal Studios in the 1960's. Haha!!![]()
Last edited by mazdamazda; May 25th, 2007 at 07:51 PM.
reopening the thread.
Last edited by mazdamazda; May 25th, 2007 at 07:52 PM.
watch one of the many vids debunking that:
http://video.google.com/videoplay?do...20001826403666
mahirap din kasi i-confirm na yun mga nag-disprove eh tama, kasi nakapunta ba din sila sa moon![]()
if I recall, one of the items left behind by Apollo 11 was a device that sent back a laser pulse back to Earth which was picked up by special receivers. It was used to help calculate the moon's distance from the Earth.
If the moon landings didn't occur, then how'd it get there?
USA have all the money in the world. Imagine pati ung mga UFO sightings di naman din totoo. Lagot sila if magkaron tayo ng real-life "V" from the movie V for Vendetta hahaha pinasabog ung Big Ben. Ung sa 911 obvious naman na inside job. May planted bomb talaga. I don't know if napanood nyo sa news ung isang survivor sinabi super hot daw. Ah basta hahaha
Hmmmm. I actually noticed the same thing about the camera crosshairs behind objects instead of in front when I was reading about the moon landings in National Geographic magazine during elementary school. Image Editing or Hoax?......... Don't know.
Add: To be fair, it was the same with the later Space Shuttle photos.
Interestingly I was reading about it a few days ago here:
http://www.braeunig.us/space/hoax.htm
mahilig pala sa conspiracy theories ung thread starter.
How about the one where shape-shifter reptile aliens rule the world?
----------
here's something to start with: http://www.amazon.com/gp/richpub/syl...w/NZU5QXDQ1YED
Last edited by uls; May 26th, 2007 at 10:37 AM.
I'm not sure if this is an actual lunar module image on the moon. But, I can make out stars dimly at the hi-res image. And there certainly seems to be a very shallow crater and discoloration (scorching from the exhaust?). It certainly isn't a crater in the classic sense like the one in the foreground.
http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedi...Moon-Hires.jpg
As to why there's no flying dust when the astronauts lifted off from the moon....
This diagram may explain why. The exhaust would've been trapped inside the Descent Stage first. Then, it would've richocheted off the surface of the Descent Stage, not the moon surface.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Image:LEM-linedrawing.png
I believe the moon landings occurred although I do have questions about some aspects of it like the camera crosshairs.
Last edited by Jun aka Pekto; May 26th, 2007 at 11:16 AM.
The Camera crosshairs fade out against bright objects. Happens on Earth, too.
You know, the silly thing about all these conspiracy theories is this:
America is the land of confessions and exposes. Just thirty years on, CIA Agents, the blackest of the black, are spilling their guts all over the news. I mean, these guys are hardcore, trained killers who would have slit their own throat rather than betray their country during the Cold War, and they talk like they're on Oprah.
So why has absolutely nobody come forward about the Moon Landings?
Here's how you fake a moon landing.
First, you'd have to find a field of pure lahar or gray volcanic ash, to fake the moon backdrop. You'd have to have mountains of that stuff. Can't find that in the US... maybe Pampanga, but it wasn't under lahar at that time.
Say you could do that. Find a small Pacific Island covered in it. Then you'd need cargo ships to transport people and cargo. Some stevedore would have probably seen something... unless the CIA killed him.
You'd need sound engineers, special effects men, electricians, props makers, carpenters, mechanics, welders, film crews, etcetera. You'll need catering for all these people. You'll need huge electrical generators for the lights. You'll also need to make sure that you film on an absolutely cloudless, moonless night.
You'll also need groundskeepers to smoothen out the ground IF it does rain.
Of these hundreds of people, maybe a thousand or more, needed to do this... no one has come forward with an expose?
But there's one thing you can't do... you can't make Earth dust fall like it does in the Moon videos. In the Moon videos, when the astronauts kick up a plume of dust, it falls straight back to the ground. No floating dust or particles, nothing. That's impossible to do without a vacuum chamber.
Of course, if you've got an entire Pacific Island to yourself, you could probably build one to cover the entire island. But that would've cost more than NASA's budget... :hysterical:
-------
As for 9-11, something we don't really want to discuss again, I just have this to say: Do you know how difficult it is to plant demolitions explosives in a building? You have to strip each column to the bare metal and insert the explosives, then you'd have to cover them up again. That's about 180 floors' worth of explosives, and tons of C4 and untold kilometers of wiring. It would take maybe a year to wire this all up. Tell me, of the tens of thousands of people who went in and out of those buildings every day, nobody noticed them doing this?
-------
Conspiracy theorists are often cooked up by people who have more imagination than ability. The simplest way to prove a Conspiracy is to show exactly how it was done. In either case, it can't be.
Ang pagbalik ng comeback...
This "theory" is right up there with Young Earth Creationism and hardcore Intelligent Design.