The decision has been released.
Talk about being one sided...
Although I admire Renault as a team and believe that ultimately they did not use prior knowledge of Mclaren secrets to gain an advantage (just look at their performance this year) they were still found guilty of breaching the sporting code and should have been punished. (What that punishment is, well thats up in the air)
Thats the problem with throwing harsh rulings like what they did to Mclaren. The FIA creates a dangerous precedent and soon Mclaren will now start accusing other teams and comparing the decisions handed with those of their own. In the end more questions are raised than ever before and what a sorry mess everyone ends up with.
My select quote from the grandprix.com editorial.
One thing we do know for certain is that the two decisions taken feature completely different attitudes towards the teams in question with one being given the benefit of the doubt at every turn and the other being doubted at every turn and indeed ruled to have been doing something wrong based on no real evidence. Why was that?
http://www.grandprix.com/ns/ns19919.html
http://www.grandprix.com/ns/ns19920.html




Reply With Quote

