Usapang US presidentiables

[safeorigin]

Hillary Clinton Wins the Federal Reserve Primary | Mises Wire

[safeorigin]

https://archive.is/tvXDT

Dear white people if Trump wins young niggas such as myself are fully hell bent on inciting riots everywhere we go. Just so you know.

see? whenever Soros funds a bunch of "protesters", this is bound to happen

[Monseratto]

[safeorigin]

an actual discussion without invoking all that political correctness horsecrap

[StockEngine]

Is this scene from "suits"? Lol

Excellent content.

[unmarked]

Panuorin nyo house of cards series. Panalo kasi nakisabay sa primaries and current events.

Sent from my SM-N9005 using Tapatalk

[Monseratto]

[safeorigin]

this was Trump's statement back in January just this year



Yup, trump is vindicated.

it isn't racist.

it's using your damn brains when there's a clear and present danger.

[safeorigin]

as expected, it will be a Selection and not an election.

GOP insiders: Nominee won't be limited to winner of 8 states | Washington Examiner

Election Results From the Primaries in Ohio, Florida, Illinois, North Carolina, and Missouri - The Atlantic

They did it with Ron Paul. They will do it again against Trump.

[safeorigin]

establishment republicans are desperate

Whose Bright Idea Was It To Show A Naked Melania Trump In An Attack Ad? | Zero Hedge

obviously NSFW :P

meanwhile, the one branded "racist" for telling the whole world about the reality of open border policy in the middle of a war is vindicated

Trump Blasts Muslims After Brussels Attack: "We Cannot Let These People Into Our Country" | Zero Hedge

indeed, trump isn't alone in this one

UKIP Uses Brussels Attacks To Make Brexit Case

dissolution of the EU is becoming more of a reality by the day



by now, people with actual brains may have caught up to the idea that mass illegal immigration isn't the best idea after all

How Hillary Clinton and Bernie Sanders Used to Talk About Immigration Laws | TheBlaze.com

hehehe

more doublespeak and flipflopping to come

[StockEngine]

Trump should win...He has a clear idea about that religion 👀

[frenchtower]

Paul Ryan's name is being floated around. Could this be the Hail Mary ticket the GOP establishment is scheming?

[safeorigin]

gawd... How I wish the VP would have been Rand Paul - someone who actually knows what he's doing

[safeorigin]

Trump should win...He has a clear idea about that religion 👀

the big question is, will the RNC allow him to win? because all roads point to a Brokered Convention

[safeorigin]

meanwhile, Idiot Cruz is blaming Trump for the Brussels attack.

hahaha

how low can this election get?

In fact, Trump is more libertarian than Cruz.

Trump questions need for NATO, outlines noninterventionist foreign policy - The Washington Post

He is pursuing a non-interventionist policy akin to Ron Paul. He clearly recognizes that the more the US polices the world, the more insurgency/terrorism grows.

[safeorigin]

How would a Hillary Presidency handle another Brussels scenario?

Clinton: Closing borders 'unrealistic' | TheHill

But of course, there's more to it than the doublespeak

http://www.investigativeproject.org/...s/misc/778.pdf

Back in 2012, The State department ordered that the Muslim Brotherhood be exempted from TSA pat down and screening and other screenings of sorts. In other words, they were given port courtesy.

So yeah, good luck with that

[safeorigin]

part 1:

what clinton emails look like:

WikiLeaks - Hillary Clinton Email Archive

From: Sidney Blumenthal
To: Hillary Clinton
Date: 2011-09-15 21:00
Subject: FRANCE, UK, ET AL, JOCKEYING IN LIBYA/OIL


UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05782501 Date: 01/07/2016

RELEASE IN FULL

CONFIDENTIAL

September 16, 2011

For: Hillary
From: Sid
Re: France, UK, et al, jockeying in Libya/oil


During mid-September 2011 French President Nicolas Sarkozy and British Prime Minister David
Cameron traveled to Tripoli to meet with and express support for the leaders of the new
government of Libya under the National Transitional Council (NTC). According to
knowledgeable individuals, as part of this effort, the two leaders, in private conversations, also

intend to press the leaders of the NTC to reward their early support for the rebellion against
Muammar al Qaddafi. Sarkozy and Cameron expect this recognition to be tangible, in the form
of favorable contracts for French and British energy companies looking to play a major role in
the Libyan oil industry. According to this source, Sarkozy feels, quite strongly, that without
French support there would have been no revolution and that the NTC government must
demonstrate that it realizes this fact. For his part, Cameron appears most concerned that despite

British support for the rebels during the fighting, certain members of the NTC remain focused on
the fact that the British government and oil industry had good relations with the Qaddafi regime,
particularly the firm British Petroleum (BP).

At the same time, this source indicates that the government of France is carrying out a concerted
program of private and public diplomacy to press the new/transitional government of Libya to

reserve as much as 35% of Libya's oil related industry for French firms, particularly the major
French energy company TOTAL. Sources with access to the highest levels of Libya's ruling
NTC, as well as senior advisors to Sarkozy, stated in strict confidence that while much of this
pressure is being exerted at very senior diplomatic and political levels, the French external
intelligence service (Direction Generale de la Securite Exterieure/General Directorate for

External Security --DGSE) is using sources with influence over the NTC to press the French
position. At present, as NTC leaders are consolidating their positions in Tripoli, they are
attempting to balance the interests of the new government and the Libyan people against the
need to recognize the support provided to them by France and other major powers in their
struggle with Muammar al Qaddafi.

These same sources indicate that NTC President Mustafa Abdul Jalil and the NTC leadership
continue to be highly suspicious of the activities and goals of the governments of China and

UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05782501 Date: 01/07/2016

Russia in Libya. According to these sources, representatives of the Emir of Qatar have privately
warned that while both countries pursue foreign economic policies that work to the disadvantage
of the host government, it is somewhat easier to deal with firms associated with Russia. With

this in mind the NTC has entered into an agreement with the Amsterdam base energy firm of
GUNVOR International BV, which has close ties to the Russian government and the Russian oil
industry. The NTC has also entered into an initial agreement, allowing TOTAL, to purchase and
ship Libyan oil. This individual believes that this agreement does not set aside any specific
portion of the Libyan oil industry for TOTAL, as Sarkozy would like.

(Source Comment: NTC President Jalil continues to favor awarding foreign business agreements
on a case by case basis, and has stated privately that he is reluctant to support entering into a
comprehensive agreement of any kind with France, or any other country or entity. He is,
however, prepared to favor firms from France, the United Kingdom, and the United States in
specific cases, based on the support they provided for the NTC during the rebellion. He and his

advisors are somewhat hostile toward the position of the Italian government and the Italian
energy firm ENI, based on their past support for Qaddafi and their caution in coming to terms
with the NTC before the fall of the previous government. Jalil harbors similar sentiments toward
the UK government and British Petroleum (BP) but does recognize that they moved away from
Qaddafi to support the NTC after France began active involvement in the Libyan uprising.
Interestingly, although Jalil and Prime Minister Mahmoud Jebril have begun a low key power
struggle within the NTC, they agree on these points regarding foreign business contracts. A

separate source added that the French government in general and the DGSE in particular
privately harbor a degree of mistrust toward Jalil based on intelligence indicating that he was
responsible for the assassination of NTC military commander General Abdul Fatah Younes in
July 2011. Younes was extremely well connected to the DGSE and the French military.)

In the opinion of these sources the NTC leadership is more comfortable dealing with large

private firms that are, in turn, well connected to friendly governments. To this end, and in
addition to the GUNVOR and TOTAL contracts, the NTC has signed agreements with the Swiss
energy firm GLENCORE, as well as VITOL of Qatar to service and ship oil as the fighting dies
down across the country. These sources add that both firms provided active support to the NTC
during the rebellion and are held in high regard by Jalil, Jabril and the rest of the leadership.

During early September 2011 sources with excellent access to the highest levels of major
Western European governments stated in confidence that, despite the stepped up fighting in
recent weeks, there has been an unusually low level of damage to the infrastructure of the Libyan
oil industry. This is true even in the western portion of the country and around town of Sirte,
which remained under the control of forces loyal to Qaddafi. The NTC is already shipping
approximately 300mm barrels of oil per day, primarily via GLENCORE and VITOL. The level

of production is expected to increase when the fighting begins to die down in those areas still
loyal to Qaddafi.

(Source Comment: According to an individual with excellent access to the governments of
Western Europe, the NTC must continue to make the final defeat and capture of Qaddafi their
principal preoccupation, and avoid falling into political infighting and attempts by individuals to

profit from the revolution. Failure to do so will lead to an extended period of violence and

UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05782501 Date: 01/07/2016

political chaos. Among the most important points the NTC leadership must address are its
ability to field an organized and disciplined military force, while providing battlefield medical

support for its troops, and humanitarian aid to the civilian population. In the opinion of this
knowledgeable individual, until these goals are met the NTC will struggle to maintain credibility
as an established government in Libya and among its foreign supporters.)

regarding the middle east:

She is very much aware of how terrorists are funded through Saudi

WikiLeaks cables portray Saudi Arabia as a cash machine for terrorists | World news | The Guardian

But of course, Saudi gave her foundation some money

Foreign governments gave millions to foundation while Clinton was at State Dept. - The Washington Post

thus, she reversed her decision and now(and still) wants to arm the so-called "moderate rebels"

Hillary Clinton wanted to arm Syrian rebels, memoir reveals | US news | The Guardian

[safeorigin]

part 2:

but of course, the entire point of removing Assad is to maintain Israel's monopoly of nukes

WikiLeaks - Hillary Clinton Email Archive

UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05794498 Date: 11/30/2015 RELEASE IN FULL

The best way to help Israel deal with Iran's growing nuclear capability is to help the people of
Syria overthrow the regime of Bashar Assad.

Negotiations to limit Iran's nuclear program will not solve Israel's security dilemma. Nor will
they stop Iran from improving the crucial part of any nuclear weapons program — the capability

to enrich uranium. At best, the talks between the world's major powers and Iran that began in
Istanbul this April and will continue in Baghdad in May will enable Israel to postpone by a few
months a decision whether to launch an attack on Iran that could provoke a major Mideast war.

Iran's nuclear program and Syria's civil war may seem unconnected, but they are. For Israeli
leaders, the real threat from a nuclear-armed Iran is not the prospect of an insane Iranian leader
launching an unprovoked Iranian nuclear attack on Israel that would lead to the annihilation of
both countries. What Israeli military leaders really worry about -- but cannot talk about -- is

losing their nuclear monopoly. An Iranian nuclear weapons capability would not only end that
nuclear monopoly but could also prompt other adversaries, like Saudi Arabia and Egypt, to go
nuclear as well. The result would be a precarious nuclear balance in which Israel could not
respond to provocations with conventional military strikes on Syria and Lebanon, as it can today.
If Iran were to reach the threshold of a nuclear weapons state, Tehran would find it much easier

to call on its allies in Syria and Hezbollah to strike Israel, knowing that its nuclear weapons
would serve as a deterrent to Israel responding against Iran itself.

Back to Syria. It is the strategic relationship between Iran and the regime of Bashar Assad in
Syria that makes it possible for Iran to undermine Israel's security — not through a direct attack,
which in the thirty years of hostility between Iran and Israel has never occurred, but through its
proxies in Lebanon, like Hezbollah, that are sustained, armed and trained by Iran via Syria. The
end of the Assad regime would end this dangerous alliance. Israel's leadership understands well

why defeating Assad is now in its interests. Speaking on CNN's Amanpour show last week,
Defense Minister Ehud Barak argued that "the toppling down of Assad will be a major blow to
the radical axis, major blow to Iran.... It's the only kind of outpost of the Iranian influence in the
Arab world...and it will weaken dramatically both Hezbollah in Lebanon and Hamas and Islamic
Jihad in Gaza."

Bringing down Assad would not only be a massive boon to Israel's security, it would also ease
Israel's understandable fear of losing its nuclear monopoly. Then, Israel and the United States

might be able to develop a common view of when the Iranian program is so dangerous that
military action could be warranted. Right now, it is the combination of Iran's strategic alliance
with Syria and the steady progress in Iran's nuclear enrichment program that has led Israeli
leaders to contemplate a surprise attack — if necessary over the objections of Washington. With
Assad gone, and Iran no longer able to threaten Israel through its, proxies, it is possible that the

United States and Israel can agree on red lines for when Iran's program has crossed an
unacceptable threshold. In short, the White House can ease the tension that has developed with
Israel over Iran by doing the right thing in Syria.

The rebellion in Syria has now lasted more than a year. The opposition is not going away, nor is
the regime going to accept a diplomatic solution from the outside. With his life and his family at
risk, only the threat or use of force will change the Syrian dictator Bashar Assad's mind.

UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05794498 Date: 11/30/2015 The Obama administration has been understandably wary of engaging in an air operation in Syria like the one conducted in Libya for three main reasons. Unlike the Libyan opposition forces, the Syrian rebels are not unified and do not hold territory. The Arab League has not called for outside military intervention as it did in Libya. And the Russians are opposed. Libya was an easier case. But other than the laudable purpose of saving Libyan civilians from likely attacks by Qaddafi's regime, the Libyan operation had no long-lasting consequences for the region. Syria is harder. But success in Syria would be a transformative event for the Middle East. Not only would another ruthless dictator succumb to mass opposition on the streets, but the region would be changed for the better as Iran would no longer have a foothold in the Middle East from which to threaten Israel and undermine stability in the region. Unlike in Libya, a successful intervention in Syria would require substantial diplomatic and military leadership from the United States. Washington should start by expressing its willingness to work with regional allies like Turkey, Saudi Arabia, and Qatar to organize, train and arm Syrian rebel forces. The announcement of such a decision would, by itself, likely cause substantial defections from the Syrian military. Then, using territory in Turkey and possibly Jordan, U.S. diplomats and Pentagon officials can start strengthening the opposition. It will take time. But the rebellion is going to go on for a long time, with or without U.S. involvement. The second step is to develop international support for a coalition air operation. Russia will never support such a mission, so there is no point operating through the UN Security Council. Some argue that U.S. involvement risks a wider war with Russia. But the Kosovo example shows otherwise. In that case, Russia had genuine ethnic and political ties to the Serbs, which don't exist between Russia and Syria, and even then Russia did little more than complain. Russian officials have already acknowledged they won't stand in the way if intervention comes. Arming the Syrian rebels and using western air power to ground Syrian helicopters and airplanes is a low-cost high payoff approach. As long as Washington's political leaders stay firm that no U.S. ground troops will be deployed, as they did in both Kosovo and Libya, the costs to the United States will be limited. Victory may not come quickly or easily, but it will come. And the payoff will be substantial. Iran would be strategically isolated, unable to exert its influence in the Middle East. The resulting regime in Syria will see the United States as a friend, not an enemy. Washington would gain substantial recognition as fighting for the people in the Arab world, not the corrupt regimes. For Israel, the rationale for a bolt from the blue attack on Iran's nuclear facilities would be eased. And a new Syrian regime might well be open to early action on the frozen peace talks with Israel. Hezbollah in Lebanon would be cut off from its Iranian sponsor since Syria would no longer be a transit point for Iranian training, assistance and missiles. All these strategic benefits and the prospect of saving thousands of civilians from murder at the hands of the Assad regime (10,000 have already been killed in this first year of civil war). With the veil of fear lifted from the Syrian people, they seem determine to fight for their freedom. America can and should help them — and by doing so help Israel and help reduce the risk of a wider war.

[safeorigin]

[safeorigin]

yup! you heard it right! Hillary created ISIS!