Impeachment against CJ Corona..

[shadow]

sir hindi po trabaho ng s.c. ang mag imbestiga.... nasa justice dept. po yan... at hindi din gawain ng s.c. ang mag pa impeach.... hintayin natin na umupo muna kayo ni penoy sa s.c.... at dun pwede gawin ni penoy ang gusto nya gawin.... para sa programa nyang DAAN MATUWID... pag may masagasaan na karapatan..... eh TUMABI ka.... para hindi ka madamay..... KAHIT NA ikaw pa pinakamataas na hukuman na TINALAGA ng atin constitution.... WEATHER weather lang.....

Sinabi ko ba SC mag investigate, Si corona lang hehehe

Hinde Kasi bumenta yun pinipilit niyo na Laban Sa SC Ito eh, laban lang Kay corona...

[glenn manikis]

Sinabi ko ba SC mag investigate, Si corona lang hehehe

Hinde Kasi bumenta yun pinipilit niyo na Laban Sa SC Ito eh, laban lang Kay corona...

laban na din po namin at may parating nanaman daw kaming addil. cash gift pang 5 na,jdf,saj,half month at allowance... lahat below 30k kaya tax exempt... joke....

[niwde11]

Sinabi ko ba SC mag investigate, Si corona lang hehehe

Hinde Kasi bumenta yun pinipilit niyo na Laban Sa SC Ito eh, laban lang Kay corona...

the way things are going, its not only for Corona. isama mo na pati yung walong SC na; (pag pro gma ka e anti-HL yung walo at kung pro pnoy ka e pro gma yung walo). pag humarang ka sa "Daang matuwid" e kasama ka sa impeachment. kasi for sure me lalabas na namang ebidensya dyan para dun sa walong SC. now kung yung walong SC e tatabi sa "Tuwid na Daan" e baka bago magbago isip ng me hawak ng kaban ng bayan. sa PInas talaga. pag trinabaho ka, kahit siguro santo e me kasalanan.

[glenn manikis]

tangalin na ang KORTE SUPREMA!!!... PALITAN NALANG NATIN ng OFFICE OF THE SUPREME PRESIDENT OF THE PHILIPPINES.....

[shadow]

the way things are going, its not only for Corona. isama mo na pati yung walong SC na; (pag pro gma ka e anti-HL yung walo at kung pro pnoy ka e pro gma yung walo). pag humarang ka sa "Daang matuwid" e kasama ka sa impeachment. kasi for sure me lalabas na namang ebidensya dyan para dun sa walong SC. now kung yung walong SC e tatabi sa "Tuwid na Daan" e baka bago magbago isip ng me hawak ng kaban ng bayan. sa PInas talaga. pag trinabaho ka, kahit siguro santo e me kasalanan.

Wala naman doon sa walo ah...Meron na ba?

[shadow]

tangalin na ang KORTE SUPREMA!!!... PALITAN NALANG NATIN ng OFFICE OF THE SUPREME PRESIDENT OF THE PHILIPPINES.....

Huwag naman Si corona tanggaling...Huwag na idamay sc...hinde na nga bumenta en

[shadow]

Grabe na Ito ah! Puro TRO nafile Sa SC ng defense...sani nga ng prosecution acquittal by TRO gusto ni corona and defense :rofl:

[niwde11]

Wala naman doon sa walo ah...Meron na ba?

papunta na run kaya yung apat pa lang pinatatawag. kasi pag nagsalita yung apat tuloy tuloy na yun. baka si Carpio at Sereno na lang matira.

but of course, kung babaligtad yung walo e ibang usapan na yun.

[Monseratto]

If the impeachment subpoenas the SC justices, and none of them bothers to show up using the seperation of powers courtesy ekek; can the impeachment court hold them in contempt and have them arrested? Who will determine if the impeachment court has jurisdiction over the SC justices?

[niwde11]

Grabe na Ito ah! Puro TRO nafile Sa SC ng defense...sani nga ng prosecution acquittal by TRO gusto ni corona and defense :rofl:

hehhe nakakita sila ng butas sa MR ni Santiago. for sure isasama nila yan sa decision nila magfile ng TRO.

laban ng mga Ilongo ito. Drilon/tupaz vs. santiago hehehehhe

[niwde11]

If the impeachment subpoenas the SC justices, and none of them bothers to show up using the seperation of powers courtesy ekek; can the impeachment court hold them in contempt and have them arrested? Who will determine if the impeachment court has jurisdiction over the SC justices?

well yan siguro yung tinatawag na Constitutional Crisis.

but i doubt it. it will be presided by AJ Carpio. iba kung ang magprepreside e isa dun sa walo.

[fourtheboys96]

Gaguhan na! defense nag file ng petition sa SC to nullify impeachment complaint, bank acct subpoena...

care to elaborate?

[shadow]

If the impeachment subpoenas the SC justices, and none of them bothers to show up using the seperation of powers courtesy ekek; can the impeachment court hold them in contempt and have them arrested? Who will determine if the impeachment court has jurisdiction over the SC justices?

I doubt it if enrile and the senators will issue subpoena to the justices, sinabi na nila if it's voluntary ok lang pero to compel hinde nila gagawin,

The question is are the justices as fair as enrile and the senate not to issue TRO To stop the proceedings

No need for any institution to determine who has jurisdiction over whom, constitution already said who has sole power over Impeachment proceedings and what is the mandate of the proceeding

Where are people now who kept on harping about constitutional crisis if the impeachment against CJ will happen?

Ngayon sila lumabas at magsabi ng cons crisis if and when the SC issue a TRO to stop the proceedings. Senate will never follow TRO I think pag naglabas SC.

[shadow]

care to elaborate?

Nope! Defense action speak for itself..

[fourtheboys96]

the problem with this impeachment court (and our constitution for that matter) is that there is feeling among some of the senator judges and probably the prosecution panel that it above and supreme to any other institution in the government. that they can summon anyone or subpoena anything even if existing laws are being violated. i find it ironic that you try someone because of some alleged violations and they want to prove it by evidence gathered through illegal means by itself.


fortunately, enrile has some sense in being cautious with some of the requests because we maybe getting rid of one "corrupt" person but in the end we cause more damage and rift among the different institutions in our country.

kung ginawa lang ng prosecutors ang assigment nila, hindi aabot sa ganito. in a sense, tama si bad boy farinas.

[fourtheboys96]

Nope! Defense action speak for itself..

i guess ginagago nila ang mga bobo

[Retz]

Malacañang breathes down neck of Karen Jimeno
February 8, 2012
By benign0


Deputy Presidential Spokesperson Abigail Valte haughtily announces Malacañang’s looking forward to Jimeno’s “explanation” of a “statement” she signed “from the University of the Philippines College of Law faculty dated January 2010 urging then President Gloria Macapagal Arroyo not to appoint a chief justice since it would be considered a midnight appointment”.

more....
Malacañang breaths down neck of Karen Jimeno | Get Real Post

[shadow]

the problem with this impeachment court (and our constitution for that matter) is that there is feeling among some of the senator judges and probably the prosecution panel that it above and supreme to any other institution in the government. that they can summon anyone or subpoena anything even if existing laws are being violated. i find it ironic that you try someone because of some alleged violations and they want to prove it by evidence gathered through illegal means by itself.

fortunately, enrile has some sense in being cautious with some of the requests because we maybe getting rid of one "corrupt" person but in the end we cause more damage and rift among the different institutions in our country.

kung ginawa lang ng prosecutors ang assigment nila, hindi aabot sa ganito. in a sense, tama si bad boy farinas.

What illegal means? Subpoena nga eh para legal... hulihin nila yun short lady siya nag violate ng bank secrecy law..

So presiding officer and impeachment court is being fair, so whats the problem?

[shadow]

i guess ginagago nila ang mga bobo

Mga bobo at uto uto na naniniwala sa defense and kay corona

[Retz]

na subpoena na rin ba si short lady?