Impeachment against CJ Corona..

[Retz]

magkano ba ang billable hour ng isang lawyer with the caliber of Cuevas?

maybe sir glenn or galant could answer this. they work in the judiciary.

[Retz]

Prosecution team Cong. Farinas is considering to downsize the articles of impeachment into 5 articles that will tackle strong cases mainly in articles 2(SALN),3 & 8(Judiciary Fund) to hasten the impeachment court proceedings.

[shadow]

^make sense...

[shadow]

Gaguhan na! defense nag file ng petition sa SC to nullify impeachment complaint, bank acct subpoena...

[Retz]

that's the legal remedy of the defense team to counter the subpoena issued sa mga bank account records.

[fourtheboys96]

Gaguhan na! defense nag file ng petition sa SC to nullify impeachment complaint, bank acct subpoena...

care to elaborate?

[shadow]

care to elaborate?

Nope! Defense action speak for itself..

[fourtheboys96]

Nope! Defense action speak for itself..

i guess ginagago nila ang mga bobo

[shadow]

i guess ginagago nila ang mga bobo

Mga bobo at uto uto na naniniwala sa defense and kay corona

[Retz]

Malacañang breathes down neck of Karen Jimeno
February 8, 2012
By benign0


Deputy Presidential Spokesperson Abigail Valte haughtily announces Malacañang’s looking forward to Jimeno’s “explanation” of a “statement” she signed “from the University of the Philippines College of Law faculty dated January 2010 urging then President Gloria Macapagal Arroyo not to appoint a chief justice since it would be considered a midnight appointment”.

more....
Malacañang breaths down neck of Karen Jimeno | Get Real Post

[niwde11]

Malacañang breathes down neck of Karen Jimeno
February 8, 2012
By benign0


Deputy Presidential Spokesperson Abigail Valte haughtily announces Malacañang’s looking forward to Jimeno’s “explanation” of a “statement” she signed “from the University of the Philippines College of Law faculty dated January 2010 urging then President Gloria Macapagal Arroyo not to appoint a chief justice since it would be considered a midnight appointment”.

more....
Malacañang breaths down neck of Karen Jimeno | Get Real Post

afaik kahit si Cuevas against sa midnight appointee ni Corona. i guess "lawyers" can only answer that. considering how they know the "law". anyone?:D

[fourtheboys96]

the problem with this impeachment court (and our constitution for that matter) is that there is feeling among some of the senator judges and probably the prosecution panel that it above and supreme to any other institution in the government. that they can summon anyone or subpoena anything even if existing laws are being violated. i find it ironic that you try someone because of some alleged violations and they want to prove it by evidence gathered through illegal means by itself.


fortunately, enrile has some sense in being cautious with some of the requests because we maybe getting rid of one "corrupt" person but in the end we cause more damage and rift among the different institutions in our country.

kung ginawa lang ng prosecutors ang assigment nila, hindi aabot sa ganito. in a sense, tama si bad boy farinas.

[shadow]

the problem with this impeachment court (and our constitution for that matter) is that there is feeling among some of the senator judges and probably the prosecution panel that it above and supreme to any other institution in the government. that they can summon anyone or subpoena anything even if existing laws are being violated. i find it ironic that you try someone because of some alleged violations and they want to prove it by evidence gathered through illegal means by itself.

fortunately, enrile has some sense in being cautious with some of the requests because we maybe getting rid of one "corrupt" person but in the end we cause more damage and rift among the different institutions in our country.

kung ginawa lang ng prosecutors ang assigment nila, hindi aabot sa ganito. in a sense, tama si bad boy farinas.

What illegal means? Subpoena nga eh para legal... hulihin nila yun short lady siya nag violate ng bank secrecy law..

So presiding officer and impeachment court is being fair, so whats the problem?

[shadow]

If its true since wala pang confirmation, how can an impeachment court be under SC? Yan ang gaguhan

[glenn manikis]

If its true since wala pang confirmation, how can an impeachment court be under SC? Yan ang gaguhan

sir pag may grave abuse of discretion or authority ang impeachment court... ang S.C. ang mag interpret po o ang magdedecide kung may violation sa constitution ang senate impeachment court..... ganun talaga sir weather weather lang po... pag naging CHIEF JUSTICE NA si penoy cya naman ang mag interpret ng batas natin... mag aral muna siya ng law at pag pumasa sya... AT NABAKANTE ANG POSITION NA CHEAP JUSTICE mag apply po cya sa JBC... cgurado qualified syang maging CHEAP JUSTICE... Peace.....

[shadow]

sir pag may grave abuse of discretion or authority ang impeachment court... ang S.C. ang mag interpret po o ang magdedecide kung may violation sa constitution ang senate impeachment court..... ganun talaga sir weather weather lang po... pag naging CHIEF JUSTICE NA si penoy cya naman ang mag interpret ng batas natin... mag aral muna siya ng law at pag pumasa sya... AT NABAKANTE ANG POSITION NA CHEAP JUSTICE mag apply po cya sa JBC... cgurado qualified syang maging CHEAP JUSTICE... Peace.....

According to you and corona camp wanted it to be that way unfortunately hinde ganun...

Meron pang pwede ikaso Kay Penot, nag offer siya ng PSG Kay grace lee...oh kasuhan na yan! :rofl:

File na rin tayo ng petition sa SC prayer to stop impeachment proceeding against coronayo bec of the earthquake sa negros

[glenn manikis]

According to you and corona camp wanted it to be that way unfortunately hinde ganun...

Meron pang pwede ikaso Kay Penot, nag offer siya ng PSG Kay grace lee...oh kasuhan na yan! :rofl:

File na rin tayo ng petition sa SC prayer to stop impeachment proceeding against coronayo bec of the earthquake sa negros

sir hindi po trabaho ng s.c. ang mag imbestiga.... nasa justice dept. po yan... at hindi din gawain ng s.c. ang mag pa impeach.... hintayin natin na umupo muna kayo ni penoy sa s.c.... at dun pwede gawin ni penoy ang gusto nya gawin.... para sa programa nyang DAAN MATUWID... pag may masagasaan na karapatan..... eh TUMABI ka.... para hindi ka madamay..... KAHIT NA ikaw pa pinakamataas na hukuman na TINALAGA ng atin constitution.... WEATHER weather lang.....

[shadow]

sir hindi po trabaho ng s.c. ang mag imbestiga.... nasa justice dept. po yan... at hindi din gawain ng s.c. ang mag pa impeach.... hintayin natin na umupo muna kayo ni penoy sa s.c.... at dun pwede gawin ni penoy ang gusto nya gawin.... para sa programa nyang DAAN MATUWID... pag may masagasaan na karapatan..... eh TUMABI ka.... para hindi ka madamay..... KAHIT NA ikaw pa pinakamataas na hukuman na TINALAGA ng atin constitution.... WEATHER weather lang.....

Sinabi ko ba SC mag investigate, Si corona lang hehehe

Hinde Kasi bumenta yun pinipilit niyo na Laban Sa SC Ito eh, laban lang Kay corona...

[galant E SS]

According to you and corona camp wanted it to be that way unfortunately hinde ganun...

Meron pang pwede ikaso Kay Penot, nag offer siya ng PSG Kay grace lee...oh kasuhan na yan! :rofl:

File na rin tayo ng petition sa SC prayer to stop impeachment proceeding against coronayo bec of the earthquake sa negros

Read ARTICLE VIII, Sec. 1 of the 1987 Phil. Constitution:


Judicial Department


SECTION 1. The judicial power shall be vested in one Supreme Court and in such lower courts as may be established by law.

Judicial power includes the duty of the courts of justice to settle actual controversies involving rights which are legally demandable and enforceable, and to determine whether or not there has been a grave abuse of discretion amounting to lack or excess of jurisdiction on the part of any branch or instrumentality of the Government.

[galant E SS]

sir pag may grave abuse of discretion or authority ang impeachment court... ang S.C. ang mag interpret po o ang magdedecide kung may violation sa constitution ang senate impeachment court..... ganun talaga sir weather weather lang po... pag naging CHIEF JUSTICE NA si penoy cya naman ang mag interpret ng batas natin... mag aral muna siya ng law at pag pumasa sya... AT NABAKANTE ANG POSITION NA CHEAP JUSTICE mag apply po cya sa JBC... cgurado qualified syang maging CHEAP JUSTICE... Peace.....

I agree. This is expressly provided for by ARTICLE VIII of the 1987 Phil. Constitution, which reads:


Judicial Department


SECTION 1. The judicial power shall be vested in one Supreme Court and in such lower courts as may be established by law.

Judicial power includes the duty of the courts of justice to settle actual controversies involving rights which are legally demandable and enforceable, and to determine whether or not there has been a grave abuse of discretion amounting to lack or excess of jurisdiction on the part of any branch or instrumentality of the Government.

and Rule 65 of the Rules of Court:

RULE 65

Certiorari, Prohibition and Mandamus

Section 1. Petition for certiorari. — When any tribunal, board or officer exercising judicial or quasi-judicial functions has acted without or in excess its or his jurisdiction, or with grave abuse of discretion amounting to lack or excess of jurisdiction, and there is no appeal, or any plain, speedy, and adequate remedy in the ordinary course of law, a person aggrieved thereby may file a verified petition in the proper court, alleging the facts with certainty and praying that judgment be rendered annulling or modifying the proceedings of such tribunal, board or officer, and granting such incidental reliefs as law and justice may require.

The petition shall be accompanied by a certified true copy of the judgment, order or resolution subject thereof, copies of all pleadings and documents relevant and pertinent thereto, and a sworn certification of non-forum shopping as provided in the third paragraph of section 3, Rule 46. (1a)

Section 2. Petition for prohibition. — When the proceedings of any tribunal, corporation, board, officer or person, whether exercising judicial, quasi-judicial or ministerial functions, are without or in excess of its or his jurisdiction, or with grave abuse of discretion amounting to lack or excess of jurisdiction, and there is no appeal or any other plain, speedy, and adequate remedy in the ordinary course of law, a person aggrieved thereby may file a verified petition in the proper court, alleging the facts with certainty and praying that judgment be rendered commanding the respondent to desist from further proceedings in the action or matter specified therein, or otherwise granting such incidental reliefs as law and justice may require.

The petition shall likewise be accompanied by a certified true copy of the judgment, order or resolution subject thereof, copies of all pleadings and documents relevant and pertinent thereto, and a sworn certification of non-forum shopping as provided in the third paragraph of section 3, Rule 46. (2a)

Section 3. Petition for mandamus. — When any tribunal, corporation, board, officer or person unlawfully neglects the performance of an act which the law specifically enjoins as a duty resulting from an office, trust, or station, or unlawfully excludes another from the use and enjoyment of a right or office to which such other is entitled, and there is no other plain, speedy and adequate remedy in the ordinary course of law, the person aggrieved thereby may file a verified petition in the proper court, alleging the facts with certainty and praying that judgment be rendered commanding the respondent, immediately or at some other time to be specified by the court, to do the act required to be done to protect the rights of the petitioner, and to pay the damages sustained by the petitioner by reason of the wrongful acts of the respondent.

The petition shall also contain a sworn certification of non-forum shopping as provided in the third paragraph of section 3, Rule 46. (3a)

Section 4. When and where petition filed. — The petition shall be filed not later than sixty (60) days from notice of the judgment, order or resolution. In case a motion for reconsideration or new trial is timely filed, whether such motion is required or not, the sixty (60) day period shall be counted from notice of the denial of said motion.

The petition shall be filed in the Supreme Court or, if it relates to the acts or omissions of a lower court or of a corporation, board, officer or person, in the Regional Trial Court exercising jurisdiction over the territorial area as defined by the Supreme Court. It may also be filed in the Court of Appeals whether or not the same is in aid of its appellate jurisdiction, or in the Sandiganbayan if it is in aid of its appellate jurisdiction. If it involves the acts or omissions of a quasi-judicial agency, unless otherwise provided by law or these Rules, the petition shall be filed in and cognizable only by the Court of Appeals.

No extension of time to file the petition shall be granted except for compelling reason and in no case exceeding fifteen (15) days. (4a) (Bar Matter No. 803, 21 July 1998; A.M. No. 00-2-03-SC)