New and Used Car Talk Reviews Hot Cars Comparison Automotive Community

The Largest Car Forum in the Philippines

Page 793 of 3749 FirstFirst ... 693743783789790791792793794795796797803843893 ... LastLast
Results 7,921 to 7,930 of 37484
  1. Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Posts
    12,683
    #7921
    Mapfre will file a claim with the bus company and will eventually learn about your quit claim and will not pay toyota. Worse Mapre will bill you back. I think that would be considered double compensation by law.

    Sent from my SM-N910C using Tapatalk

  2. Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Posts
    2,512
    #7922
    Quote Originally Posted by MR_BIG18 View Post
    Mmm, looks like bye bye 28k, you talked to the insurance company already, if you paid the participation fee, the insurance will go after the bus company, its called right of subrogation, the bus company was willing to pay for the damages naman and you signed a waiver already. So bye bye rims
    Well, lesson learnt. Besides, there's always the probability of another accident in the future 😁

  3. Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Posts
    2,512
    #7923
    Quote Originally Posted by dreamur View Post
    Mapfre will file a claim with the bus company and will eventually learn about your quit claim and will not pay toyota. Worse Mapre will bill you back. I think that would be considered double compensation by law.

    Sent from my SM-N910C using Tapatalk
    I'm quite pissed with Mapfre's customer service. I was transparent with them every step of the way by constant emails and landline calls (they don't give out mobile number contacts). Ang bagal sumagot, grabe. In contrast, the bus company reps and lawyer were responsive and courteous.

    I was thinking of teaching Mapfre a lesson in good customer care by going through legal challenge but I will choose the pay-it-forward suggestion instead

  4. Join Date
    Jul 2015
    Posts
    9,583
    #7924
    Quote Originally Posted by anonemus View Post
    Well, lesson learnt. Besides, there's always the probability of another accident in the future 😁
    Quit while youre ahead, hope that there wont be a nxt time.

  5. Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Posts
    1,587
    #7925
    If pinahirapan ka ng mapfre, then by all means don't get them ever again. Samahan pa kita na wag nang kumuha sa mapfre. I'll consider other companies for my grand stare 'so insurance. Buti na Lang I chose federal Phoenix for my other car. [emoji1]


    Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

  6. Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Posts
    2,512
    #7926
    Quote Originally Posted by JJB View Post
    If pinahirapan ka ng mapfre, then by all means don't get them ever again. Samahan pa kita na wag nang kumuha sa mapfre. I'll consider other companies for my grand stare 'so insurance. Buti na Lang I chose federal Phoenix for my other car. [emoji1]


    Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
    My last time with Mapfre actually and when my compre expires in a couple of months, I'm changing insurance company with better customer care 👍

  7. Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Posts
    2,512
    #7927
    Quote Originally Posted by MR_BIG18 View Post
    Quit while youre ahead, hope that there wont be a nxt time.
    I will, and will cross my fingers as well ☺

  8. Join Date
    Jul 2015
    Posts
    9,583
    #7928
    Quote Originally Posted by anonemus View Post
    I will, and will cross my fingers as well ☺
    If the accident involves the wife and a paternity leave, by all means, sorry cant help it

  9. Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Posts
    3,167
    #7929
    Quote Originally Posted by lowslowbenz View Post
    What's with this LTO memo on vintage cars?

    Useless bunch of hijo de potas!
    Quote Originally Posted by dr. d View Post
    and yess.. the guy tried to explain the logic behind it.. but in truth, i got lost along the way.
    seems to me, it was ill-conceived, had no definite use or advantage, and served only to make life more difficult to the owner AND to the lto.
    i mean, the second statement appeared to belay the first statement... most cross-eyed example of gobbledygook i ever heard.
    if you ask me... 'twould be better if they simply treat the vintage as any other car.. subject to current rules and specifications. but no retroactives, please.
    Quote Originally Posted by dr. d View Post
    i just heard that they retracted the vintage order.
    Quote Originally Posted by macsd View Post
    Pwede na daw during weekends & holidays. What they should ban are those smoke belching & dilapidated vehicles rather than generalize. Really stupid heads in LTO.

    LTO recalls order restricting vintage cars | Inquirer News
    Dapat ganito nalang:

    - Voluntary lang ang vintage car scheme.

    - If you register your old car as vintage, you pay a lower registration fee, your car must pass a lower standard of tests (example: a less strict emissions test), but you can drive it only on weekends and holidays.

    - If you don't want to register your old car as a vintage, you have to pay the normal registration fee and your car must pass current tests (example: stricter emissions test), but you can drive it everyday.

  10. Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Posts
    3,167
    #7930
    Quote Originally Posted by MR_BIG18 View Post
    I think its a precursor to a new bill, like in singapore's COE.
    Old cars in Singapore can be registered as a classic.

    - 35 years old from original registration date.
    - Vehicle can be used 45 days in a year.

    Registration of Classic Vehicles | Registering Your Vehicle | Owning a Vehicle | Roads & Motoring | Land Transport Authority



    1937 MG Midget Model TA registered under the Singapore classic car scheme. Note the red and yellow plates for classsic cars.

Tags for this Thread

What Are You Thinking About?