in the world of command, most specifically in combat, it is always imperative that the commander always leads the unit to accomplish the mission.

latest technology has modified the conduct of combat especially C3. a commander can always influence the situation whether he be in the forefront or in the tactical command post.

i've always looked up to leaders who actually lead their soldiers in combat. we have a lot of gallant officers who have actually done that. and i know that there are still officers out there who will when the situation warrants them.

what i think influenced the actions of gen palparan is the POLITICAL decision. soldiers cannot do otherwise, they have to obey.