I am not defending her. I am defending the legal process of removing
presidents from office. Your suggestions on how to remove GMA are the
very ones that make the Pinoy-masa "barbarian-minded" who are too
stupid to understand what the law requires.
ERAP was also unconstitutionally removed from his office. I think the point of posters here are pointing out the GMA's first term in office was unconstitutional to begin with. Now if she's proven beyond reasonable doubt that she cheated in the recent election then she should step down, I don't care if her successor is "qualified", whats the point of an election if there is cheating (Which is yet to be proven)?