Results 51 to 58 of 58
-
April 19th, 2004 07:42 PM #51
i really wonder why the biggest parties never considered getting roco as their presidential candidate
-
April 20th, 2004 10:15 AM #52
Isa lang case ko against FPJ, he has openly admitted na mga advisers nya ang source ng decisions nya... voting for him means voting for his advisers, and boy his line of advisers are scary... hehe
Villanueva ako... although di ako boboto hehe... di ako pwede
-
Verified Tsikot Member
- Join Date
- Sep 2003
- Posts
- 22
April 20th, 2004 10:33 AM #53sayang theveed, your vote counts pa naman.
pajerokid, no prob. i won't lose sleep over it. hehe.
gretzky, ideally parties stick to their own candidates within the party. FPJ is the exception (kaya nga asar na asar si Ping kasi siya yung kapartido! hehe). Yung mga temporary coalition or yung mga "marriage of convenience", without a doubt may mga vested interests din yan. Ever wondered why senators who voted "no" (to the second envelope) in the impeachment are in the group that benefitted from EDSA 2? Then all this talk about "political prostitutes": a term everybody is thinking but no one is saying out loud. Switching parties, allegiances, etc.
Things about country, patriotism, delicadeza, fairness, social justice, Filipino, all of them sidelined. Winning is the focus, run to beat the other candidate, worry about country later.
In the end, it's becomes about staying in power. and who has the power right now?
-
-
-
-
April 21st, 2004 12:25 PM #57Originally posted by IceColdBeer
Bumalik na si Roco ah
-
April 21st, 2004 12:34 PM #58Originally posted by IceColdBeer
Bumalik na si Roco ah