I believe the definition of Atheism above is inaccurate. Atheists do accept a belief system without any concrete proof. They believe there is no God. And when asked by us Christians that what is their concrete proof then? Their concrete proof is to disprove our beliefs. since when does disproving become a concrete proof?
until today, even science is just being used to disprove our beliefs and has not provided any concrete proof yet that there is no God. so why conclude immediately that there is no such thing as God?
Fundamentalism, on its very definition above, is not even related to religion. Even dictators can be considered fundamentalists, when running their own country. even scientists can be fundamentalists, when solving scientific problems, even our very own MMDA Chief BF can be considered a fundamentalist for his own unique way of solving the traffic mess. these examples I mentioned do not even touch religion.
why do you think that the definition of fundamentalism above, revolves or are confined only on religion alone? to blame religion as the cause for divisions, war and suffering bec. of the presence of fundamentalists is unfair.
The way I see it, and from the definition above, Fundamentalists have but only one way: their way. not God's way.





