Makatarungan ba ito?

[niky]

It's a somewhat halfway good idea. Only possible problem is if the victim IDs the wrong person... highly likely if you're sifting through hundreds of photographs after such a stressful experience.

Would work for cellphone snatchings and hold-ups, but only on a limited basis.

But they really should pass a city ordinance. Surveillance within their jurisdicition is only justifiable if you inform the people being photographed/video'd that surveillance is taking place. Then, they'll have the choice of whether they want to walk in San Juan or not.

If there is no official ordinance, it may be construed as harrassment or infringement of civil liberties. Private institutions have internal surveillance because it is their right, and people who are uncomfortable with it have the choice not to go inside. If surveillance occurs in public, the public should be notified of such.

At least it'll keep the o-gags off the street.

[ts1n1ta]

Dapat nga dun sa side streets ng UST maginvest na ang UST mismo ng mgs surveillance cameras. Ang daming na hoholdup and nasasaksak dito.

Nde lang holdup at saksakan ang nagaganap lalo na sa may gov forbes side.. if you know what i mean.. eew... :lol:

Kung may batas na nagsasabing ok yan, eh di maganda yan. At least matatakot sila gumawa ng krimen. Yun nga lang baka ang tendency siguro eh lalayo ng lugar para mangholdup/kalokohan. Tutal ang mukha nila nasa baranggay nila eh.