Results 341 to 350 of 389
-
BANNED BANNED BANNED
- Join Date
- Jul 2003
- Posts
- 2,267
January 11th, 2008 08:07 PM #341bomb or gas, ayala is liable for what happened. sila ang may responsibility sa security.
yung bomb, less tarnish sa image kaya pinagpipilitan nila.
baka naman gas bomb ang sumabog? hehehe
-
BANNED BANNED BANNED
- Join Date
- Jan 2008
- Posts
- 108
January 12th, 2008 03:05 AM #342sabi nga sa dyaryo, bakit daw kinekelangan magpaimbistiga pa ng iba ang Ayala, eh sila nga ang iniimbestigahan
be accountable ... may mga napatay kayo mga innocenteng tao dahil sa kapabayaan nyo. at least respect the victims and give them due justice.
for the meantime, avoid Glorietta muna. hindi naman talaga ginawa yan from scratch like Trinoma or Serendra/Boni High Street. Tagpi-tagpi yan that's why meron area na masikip, meron area na outdated, meron area na bago.
Greenhills shopping center is also like Glorietta. tagpi-tagpi din yan. but ok lang sa Ghills kasi parang wala naman mga tubo ng gas duon sa ibabaw, ni wala at basement yun
-
January 12th, 2008 05:01 PM #343
honda97,
same here dude, same here. lets see how the case goes.
btw, ive been to the mall and the basement. i tried to temper my own convictions, but the truth is, it is difficult to swallow the bomb theory with what i saw with my own two eyes.
significant points:
1. at the atrium of the mall, some of the clothing stores right on the lobby still had some clothes displayed. some had maniquins with clothes on. books na buong-buo pa were scattered. what's the significance of this? in a bomb explosion, lapnus na sana ang mga materyales na ito. there was no soot or blackening on the walls. the blackening is consistent with high explosives, which cause a lot of thermal heat. some stores even had their signs pa
2. in the basement, the pumps and diesel tank were still whole. now if we follow the bomb theory, dapat in shreds na rin ang mga yan. lalo na if we follow the theory/rumor/suggestion that the bomb was placed in the basement.
3. finally, the exterior of the mall buo pa. kahit yung mga glass panels ng elevator sa tabi, where fashion cafe used to be, buo pa. in a bomb explosion, basag-basag na yun. if you've seen the Oklahoma bombing, a whole section of the building was carved out or skinned. may uka yung bldg tapos nahubaran. btw, some glass panels were also still whole sa atrium.
anyway, this is the last time im making any arguments on the case. i just want to give you guys a picture of the inside and make your own conclusions. im not out to convince anyone. im not siding with any of the parties because i dont care much for the both of them. i dont pretend to be an expert, all knowledge that i have is strictly what the average person can gather on his own.
peace!
-
January 14th, 2008 01:26 PM #344
Razon admits lack of PNP knowledge on chemicals
http://philstar.com/index.php?Headli...id=20080113142
so ano basis nila bakit nila pinagpipilitan yung theory nila?
-
January 14th, 2008 02:08 PM #345
I'm more inclined towards sa gas explosion, andoon ang mga FBIs, kung bomb yan sana sinabi na nila, yun mga australian experts wala rin sinasabi na bomb....
-
-
January 15th, 2008 01:32 PM #347
-
January 15th, 2008 01:46 PM #348
-
January 15th, 2008 02:26 PM #349
^^^yup! that is true, but do you think if they found out that it was a terrorist bomb, eh they will just allow PNP to brush it aside and tell the public that it was just a gas explosion?
-
January 15th, 2008 08:04 PM #350
Pwede nayan mentality.
SC (temporarily) stops NCAP