New and Used Car Talk Reviews Hot Cars Comparison Automotive Community

The Largest Car Forum in the Philippines

Page 2 of 5 FirstFirst 12345 LastLast
Results 11 to 20 of 42
  1. Join Date
    Oct 2002
    Posts
    14,822
    #11
    Quote Originally Posted by jonski View Post
    If European countries felt threatened by Australia would the US be willing to allow a missile defence system on American soil.......I doubt it!

    The Russians are not stupid and they recognise bullshit when they hear it.
    I'm suprised the yanks can keep a straight face pretending it's for Europe's benefit.
    Well, they'll be deploying it in European (NATO) not Russian soil.

    Plus, a missile defense is also good for rogue missiles fired inadvertently by a computer malfunction or a crazy field commander.

    If the shield is for US, they could've just deployed it in secrecy in Alaska, Hawaii or Canada.

  2. Join Date
    Oct 2002
    Posts
    9,894
    #12
    teka, malabo nga yata that you put a missile defense system in the Czech Republic to counter a threat from Iran :hihihi:


    kailan ba mabubuo ang ion cannon? :devil:

  3. Join Date
    May 2006
    Posts
    6,940
    #13
    Si tanya lang o si black lotus katapat niyan

  4. Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Posts
    12,347
    #14
    Quote Originally Posted by oliver1013 View Post
    1960's Khruschev placed missiles in Cuba, protection daw ni Castro
    Kennedy nagalit ayaw nila may missile sa tabi nila..nag backdown si Khruschev

    Ngayon US maglalagay missile sa Europe proptection from Iran? E may K din siguro Moscow na ayaw nila may missile sa tabi nila
    The big difference between the two is that the missiles the Russians put in Cuba are intermediate-range ICBM's designed to destroy cities in the US. They were offensive missiles with nuclear warheads. One of those Russian missiles with 2 or 3 warheads can erase an entire city.

    The kind of missile the US will use in the missile shield is designed to destroy another missile. It should be relatively short-ranged and the warhead is most likely a fragmentation type, like a grenade. The whole inventory can be fired on one city and they'll barely make a dent assuming they have the range in the first place.

    I'm with Putin, though. If there's an agreement between the US and Russia not to install a missile defense shield in Europe, then the US should abide by that agreement.

  5. Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Posts
    8,837
    #15
    bakit kaya hindi na lang tayo lagyan ng missile shield

  6. Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Posts
    1,815
    #16
    Quote Originally Posted by oldblue View Post
    bakit kaya hindi na lang tayo lagyan ng missile shield
    Good thinking there OB, maybe you could ask uncle sam about the latest on their starwar program (tama ba?) by the late ronald reagan..What happened to that program?anybody?

  7. Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Posts
    3,177
    #17
    Di siguro magreklamo si Putin kung yung shield gawa ni Invisible Girl... :inlove:

  8. Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Posts
    1,815
    #18
    Quote Originally Posted by flagg View Post
    Di siguro magreklamo si Putin kung yung shield gawa ni Invisible Girl... :inlove:
    +1

    i love the girl too

  9. Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Posts
    8,837
    #19
    ang sabi ng mga adults dati, noon daw panahon na may Clark at Subic US base dito, nag-point daw ng isang warhead sa'tin ang USSR. ano kaya naka-point pa kaya ngaun?

  10. Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Posts
    4,459
    #20
    Quote Originally Posted by oldblue View Post
    ang sabi ng mga adults dati, noon daw panahon na may Clark at Subic US base dito, nag-point daw ng isang warhead sa'tin ang USSR. ano kaya naka-point pa kaya ngaun?
    Hahahahaha oo sana sa bahay nila A.Cayetano/Escudero/Binay/Legarda/Kulungan ni ERAP, Trillanes, Gringo, Leviste. Tuloy ang asenso

Page 2 of 5 FirstFirst 12345 LastLast
Cold War, up again???