2017 Mazda CX-5

[3ple4]

Thanks travajante

Apparently, the battery is not part of the warranty. I thought that since it's a special kind of battery, the least they could do is offer a 1-year warranty pero wala pala.

[travajante]

Thanks travajante

Apparently, the battery is not part of the warranty. I thought that since it's a special kind of battery, the least they could do is offer a 1-year warranty pero wala pala.

Motolite EFB has a separate/indie 1yr warranty, sir.[emoji4]

Sent from my SM-G950F using Tapatalk

[3ple4]

My SA checked with their service dept, battery is 1-year warranty

[travajante]

Bud's on 235/55/19s



Sent from my SM-G950F using Tapatalk

[c_cube]

Bud's on 235/55/19s



Sent from my SM-G950F using Tapatalk

Looks better than 225/55/19 [emoji106] and easier to find in the market. i think cheaper as well

Sent from my LG-H990 using Tapatalk

[travajante]

Looks better than 225/55/19 [emoji106] and easier to find in the market. i think cheaper as well

Sent from my LG-H990 using Tapatalk

True! 235/55/19s are available w/ more choices locally....from budget to premium.

Sent from my SM-G950F using Tapatalk

[Nelson de Leon]

Are those stock rims?

Sent from my ASUS_Z012D using Tapatalk

[travajante]

Are those stock rims?

Sent from my ASUS_Z012D using Tapatalk

They're OEM M6 rims.[emoji4]

Sent from my SM-G950F using Tapatalk

[Nelson de Leon]

Thanks. I've been eyeing for a set but not sure if it would fit. I saw a set last year for P30k.

Sent from my ASUS_Z012D using Tapatalk

[travajante]

Thanks. I've been eyeing for a set but not sure if it would fit. I saw a set last year for P30k.

Sent from my ASUS_Z012D using Tapatalk

Anytime, sir. Like those....simple, not loud.[emoji4]

Sent from my SM-G950F using Tapatalk

[diehard]

Hello everyone. I'm new to Tsikot. I am choosing between the Mazda CX5 Pro and Honda CRV 2.0S. I prefer the styling of the CX5 (as well as its conventional 6-speed AT). However, I have a few questions:

1) Is the ride comfortable? Used to have a 2006 Mazda 3 and disposed it after two years because I couldn't stand the ride.

2) Does the 2.0L engine provide adequate power or does it feel underpowered?

3) How is back seat room? I noticed at the dealer that it has a high central tunnel.

4) Is cargo room adequate and useable? The sloping rear hatch seems to cut the vertical space quite a bit.

TIA

[Archerfish]

Hello everyone. I'm new to Tsikot. I am choosing between the Mazda CX5 Pro and Honda CRV 2.0S. I prefer the styling of the CX5 (as well as its conventional 6-speed AT). However, I have a few questions:

1) Is the ride comfortable? Used to have a 2006 Mazda 3 and disposed it after two years because I couldn't stand the ride.

2) Does the 2.0L engine provide adequate power or does it feel underpowered?

3) How is back seat room? I noticed at the dealer that it has a high central tunnel.

4) Is cargo room adequate and useable? The sloping rear hatch seems to cut the vertical space quite a bit.

TIA

I've been there... although my choice was CR-V SX, the diesel variant. I'd say there is that divine hand that I ended up with Mazda.

[Archerfish]

1. My vote for comfortable ride goes to CR-V. However, let's wait for someone who owns a CX-5. Nelson?

2. I go for Mazda, and you should know what I'm trying to say. Your experience should tell you how you are "connected" with the car.

[Egan101]

*diehard - the CRV has a bigger interior space than the CX5 which feels a bit cramped inside. Most CUVs with a 2.0L NA engine have adequate power, not too quick but at par or a bit better against most PPVs. Cargo room on the CX5 is a bit small compared to the CRV. However, the CX5 is a proven performer in terms of driver experience. What if I tell you that you can buy a CUV that is comfortable enough, has a big cargo area, decent room on the rear, not underpowered, and drives well for its size? Too bad it’s not a Mazda or a Honda.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

[diehard]

1. My vote for comfortable ride goes to CR-V. However, let's wait for someone who owns a CX-5. Nelson?

2. I go for Mazda, and you should know what I'm trying to say. Your experience should tell you how you are "connected" with the car.

Thanks for the feedback. I am actually looking for a replacement for my wife's 2008 Ford Escape 2.3L. This replaced the 2006 Mazda 3 hatchback she used to drive. I remember loving the handling of the M3 during the first few weeks of ownership. However, that feeling went away after a few months because of the jarring ride in MM's pockmarked roads. The engine was also underpowered resulting in gearing that left the car revving at a buzzy 2300 rpm at 100kph. Thus my concern about the CX5. I know I should test drive the car but you rarely get to drive it long enough and fast enough on a variety of road conditions to make a sound judgement.

[jut703]

Thanks for the feedback. I am actually looking for a replacement for my wife's 2008 Ford Escape 2.3L. This replaced the 2006 Mazda 3 hatchback she used to drive. I remember loving the handling of the M3 during the first few weeks of ownership. However, that feeling went away after a few months because of the jarring ride in MM's pockmarked roads. The engine was also underpowered resulting in gearing that left the car revving at a buzzy 2300 rpm at 100kph. Thus my concern about the CX5. I know I should test drive the car but you rarely get to drive it long enough and fast enough on a variety of road conditions to make a sound judgement.

I have an '04 Mazda 3 and we also have a '18 CRV. The CRV is far far more comfortable than the Mazda 3. Also far more spacious for both passengers and cargo.

It handles quite well for a CUV - definitely better than any PPV, but not quite as agile as a CX5 or Forester. The tradeoff for agility is that it's more comfortable and refined over poor roads than the other two CUVs and is exponentially more comfortable than any PPV.

Sent from my SM-G935F using Tapatalk

[StockEngine]

I have an '04 Mazda 3 and we also have a '18 CRV. The CRV is far far more comfortable than the Mazda 3. Also far more spacious for both passengers and cargo.

It handles quite well for a CUV - definitely better than any PPV, but not quite as agile as a CX5 or Forester. The tradeoff for agility is that it's more comfortable and refined over poor roads than the other two CUVs and is exponentially more comfortable than any PPV.

Sent from my SM-G935F using Tapatalk

thank goodness... the crvs suspension is really designed for comfort. Comfortable Run about? Vehicle.

Sent from my SM-G935F using Tapatalk

[Egan101]

thank goodness... the crvs suspension is really designed for comfort. Comfortable Run about? Vehicle.

Sent from my SM-G935F using Tapatalk

The CRV is more compared to the RAV4 in the US than a CX5 or Forester. Both CRV and RAV4 are tuned more for a comfortable ride.

The base model Forester is good value for something just below 1.5M. However, the platform is already at the end of its life cycle. A new Forester platform is to be released by 2019.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

[diehard]

I was also looking at the Rav4 Active+. It has a roomy interior, great cargo room, strong engine and traditional 6AT. Unfortunately I couldn't get over the cheap interior and lack of safety equipment and interior amenities.

[StockEngine]

I was also looking at the Rav4 Active+. It has a roomy interior, great cargo room, strong engine and traditional 6AT. Unfortunately I couldn't get over the cheap interior and lack of safety equipment and interior amenities.

tnga rav4 arrives next year [emoji6]

Sent from my SM-G935F using Tapatalk