Medyo OT.
May nakapag-compare na ba dito ng MU-X at Alterra? Hehehe.
Share naman.
30 mins ago at sctex, 3k rpm 180. Passengers, 4 adults, 2 kids sandali ko lang sinubukan isagad sa 3k rpm nung umabot sa 180kph binitawan ko na. Sobrang under powered talaga ng 2.5 MuX. Nakakainis...mag ibang brand na lang kayo [emoji1]
Does this mean mas matipid yung auto kaysa sa manual on long drive kasi able to cruise at lower RPM because of more torque. Does this also mean na dapat mas matipid Everest kasi 1.750 RPM lang at 100kph tapos 2.2 lang as compared to MU-x na 2.5 dahil din sa greater torque at 6 speed auto tranny.
Of course an engine running at a higher rpm will consume more fuel, thats a given. Can't compare two different cars with different engines though. Syempre magkaiba ang output and consumption nyan.
Sa MUX kung 100kph takbo magiging mas matipid talaga ang automatic. This is, assuming same traffic condition, same driving style.
I haven't driven a Ford Everest so I don't know its fuel consumption. Sa MUX LS-M ko real life average FC:
9.5km/l city - moderate traffic
8.5km/l city - heavy traffic
12km/l mixed city/highway
14km/l highway (105-110km/h highway speed most of the time).
Turn on your gps nav to see your true speed. I think walang speed limiter pero I doubt it can reach 200kp/h given the power to weight ratio. Need a very long flat road din siguro.
Last edited by aar0nix; November 8th, 2015 at 04:21 PM. Reason: Missing quotes [ ]
Don't bother Brother, dapat Isuzu ang mag conduct ng test in a safe facility or you can just do it at home. Go to your room turn on the aircon and relax on your fluffy bed and just dream about it... safe ka pa together with your love ones at hindi ka pa naging road hazard sa ibang motorists. The best thing about it is hindi ka na-stress naka-save ka pa ng tires and fuel... just a friendly advice. STAY SAFE