Results 41 to 50 of 87
-
-
September 20th, 2005 02:28 PM #42di pa rin proportion yung likod.
Last edited by gearspeed; September 20th, 2005 at 03:05 PM.
-
Verified Tsikot Member
- Join Date
- Sep 2005
- Posts
- 33
September 20th, 2005 02:31 PM #43sori ha sa mga owners ng City, it really looks like a half finished car....ganda ng harap hanggang gitna.....pero likod ang sama. sayang, mas marami siguro benta ito kung proportional design ang likod.
pero aesthetics aside.....a solid car with very good fuel consumption.
-
September 20th, 2005 02:35 PM #44
Originally Posted by slipstreamer
-
September 20th, 2005 02:46 PM #45
the front looks more dorky looking. the big lamps on a small body isn't working.
the new tail lamps is still not enough to counter the hideous rear tail proportion.
-
-
September 20th, 2005 02:54 PM #47
new grill with the chrome is blah. .i like the old front grill better. . rear is definitely better than the old one. .still needs a MAJOR butt lift, imo. wa parin sa proportion .. its practical but less ugly
-
September 20th, 2005 03:31 PM #48
The butt may look strange but you'll thank it when you start filling up that 500liters of space...
-
September 20th, 2005 03:33 PM #49
i'd rather take the jazz at least it looks good and can swallow lotsa stuff.
-
I feel the same way. Not a fan.
2022 Mazda BT-50 (3rd Gen)