New and Used Car Talk Reviews Hot Cars Comparison Automotive Community

The Largest Car Forum in the Philippines

Page 4 of 12 FirstFirst 12345678 ... LastLast
Results 31 to 40 of 111
  1. Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Posts
    15,312
    #31
    Hmmmm...

    Honda HR-V 1.5 S CVT Honda SENSING
    CVT Gasoline
    ₱1,250,000

    Honda HR-V 1.5 V Turbo CVT Honda SENSING
    CVT Gasoline
    ₱1,598,000

    >>>> Honda CR-V 2.0 S AT
    P1,678,000

  2. Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Posts
    54,205
    #32
    Quote Originally Posted by _Qwerty_ View Post
    Hmmmm...

    Honda HR-V 1.5 S CVT Honda SENSING
    CVT Gasoline
    ₱1,250,000

    Honda HR-V 1.5 V Turbo CVT Honda SENSING
    CVT Gasoline
    ₱1,598,000

    >>>> Honda CR-V 2.0 S AT
    P1,678,000
    ... kung wala naman masyadong mawawala,
    sa S na lang, bai.

  3. Join Date
    Nov 2011
    Posts
    1,111
    #33
    Quote Originally Posted by dr. d View Post
    ... kung wala naman masyadong mawawala,
    sa S na lang, bai.
    You will lose at lot of power.

    At 1.3M, you get the City/BR-V engine. lols

  4. Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Posts
    54,205
    #34
    Quote Originally Posted by TheUninvited View Post
    You will lose at lot of power.

    At 1.3M, you get the City/BR-V engine. lols
    unless the S is basically a sluggard,
    "where in the trafficky metro do i need all that power for?"

    but yes,
    car power is subjective.

    is there literature that can translate S power versus V turbo power, into real-world lyrics?
    Last edited by dr. d; April 20th, 2022 at 11:15 AM.

  5. Join Date
    Jul 2013
    Posts
    6,486
    #35
    Quote Originally Posted by _Qwerty_ View Post
    Hmmmm...

    Honda HR-V 1.5 S CVT Honda SENSING
    CVT Gasoline
    ₱1,250,000

    Honda HR-V 1.5 V Turbo CVT Honda SENSING
    CVT Gasoline
    ₱1,598,000

    >>>> Honda CR-V 2.0 S AT
    P1,678,000
    No plans of buying an HR-V...

    pero my wife hates the look of the CR-V.

  6. Join Date
    Feb 2014
    Posts
    2,694
    #36
    n/a version is a tiny bit lighter than ecosport DCT. so yeah it's underpowered just like the ford is but for getting to/from work it's totally just fine

    but of course the price is a totally different matter maybe they should've offered a base version w/o SENSING in order to sell more units in order to reach critical mass which in turn assures parts supply in the long run

  7. Join Date
    Jul 2013
    Posts
    6,486
    #37
    Quote Originally Posted by TheUninvited View Post
    You will lose at lot of power.

    At 1.3M, you get the City/BR-V engine. lols
    that engine has been around for so long (new City uses a DOHC version), I feel na ayaw na ng Ayala mag train ng mechanics nila for a new engine.

    The new BR-V is also expected to use the same engine.

    IMO, 1.5NA engine is more than enough... my issue is with its CVT.

  8. Join Date
    Nov 2011
    Posts
    1,111
    #38
    Quote Originally Posted by ice15 View Post
    that engine has been around for so long (new City uses a DOHC version), I feel na ayaw na ng Ayala mag train ng mechanics nila for a new engine.

    The new BR-V is also expected to use the same engine.

    IMO, 1.5NA engine is more than enough... my issue is with its CVT.
    I'm driving a base Civic FC, 1.8 NA CVT feels sluggish. So I imagine it's worse kapag 1.5 CVT.

    Also my personal experience sa prev gen HR-V (couz has it), the R18 engine is barely enough just like the Civic FC 1.8.

    My issue is nag downgrade sila from 1.8 to 1.5. Honda killed the R18 globally kase eh.

  9. Join Date
    Jul 2013
    Posts
    6,486
    #39
    Quote Originally Posted by TheUninvited View Post
    I'm driving a base Civic FC, 1.8 NA CVT feels sluggish. So I imagine it's worse kapag 1.5 CVT.

    Also my personal experience sa prev gen HR-V (couz has it), the R18 engine is barely enough just like the Civic FC 1.8.

    My issue is nag downgrade sila from 1.8 to 1.5. Honda killed the R18 globally kase eh.
    I remember playing with a City 1.5 Manual comparing it with my City CVT.

    The engine was more than enough and it was fun driving the Manual version.

    My problem with the CVT is that I feel that it needs time to respond.

    The car can climb Baguio (etc)
    it can reach 120kms/h

    my issue is the 0-100 and 80-120, the response is just not there.

  10. Join Date
    Nov 2011
    Posts
    1,111
    #40
    Quote Originally Posted by ice15 View Post
    I remember playing with a City 1.5 Manual comparing it with my City CVT.

    The engine was more than enough and it was fun driving the Manual version.

    My problem with the CVT is that I feel that it needs time to respond.

    The car can climb Baguio (etc)
    it can reach 120kms/h

    my issue is the 0-100 and 80-120, the response is just not there.
    Exactly, imagine the same drivetrain on the much heavier HR-V (heavier than the Civic din).

Page 4 of 12 FirstFirst 12345678 ... LastLast

Tags for this Thread

2021 Honda HR-V/Vezel (3rd Gen)