Results 31 to 40 of 237
-
Verified Tsikot Member
- Join Date
- May 2017
- Posts
- 572
July 4th, 2017 11:04 AM #31Not familiar with engine technicalities but is it really not adviseable to have a turbocharged engine for big people movers? The new CX-9 is using a 2.5L Turbo engine if im not mistaken... would you say that it would have a problem in the long run with it's built, weight and capacity?
-
July 4th, 2017 11:32 AM #32
A turbo-4 will be more than enough for the usual day-to-day needs of most people. The new crop of turbo-4 engines are as powerful as the older V6 NA engines but offers better fuel efficiency. Some CUVs and midsize sedans with turbo-4 engines are even quick enough (good for 0-100kmh sprints of 6-7 seconds).
If you want something quicker, I guess a turbo-6 or big V6 NA is something to consider for a big CUV or sedan.
-
July 4th, 2017 06:08 PM #33
I'm sure all those cars are quick and the turbos make them ideal for high-altitude driving (like where I am right now) and charging up a mountain. Turbos still have an appeal to me.
My problem with turbocharged cars is longevity. I usually keep cars for 10-15 years before buying a new one. Very few of the many turbo cars I saw back in the first half of the 90's survived to this day. Yet, I see numerous NA ones. Turbos are fun until it's time to service or replace them. Ka-ching! $$$$
Perhaps, turbo tech evolved enough so that they are much more durable now. But, we'll have to wait a number of years to find out. It might help too if I quit driving like a bat out of hell. You know, start driving like a grandpa. He He.
-
July 4th, 2017 06:57 PM #34
-
July 4th, 2017 07:07 PM #35
I like the pilot and atlas. the atlas looks better though. Which v6 is better..i dont know yet.
Newest & Biggest SUV: 2018 Volkswagen Atlas on Everyman Driver - YouTube
Sent from my SM-G935F using Tsikot Forums mobile app
-
July 6th, 2017 01:41 AM #36
From my recent road trip, being able to quickly merge into (high-speed) traffic is a big thing (esp in California). So, the better acceleration of the Honda Pilot and GMC Acadia will count more. Plus, my vehicles are utilitarian. Kids will ride in it. They'll spill their food and drink, putting sticky gunk on the finishes and carpeting. Dents, scratches (both inside and outside the car). Paying more for a premium feel is a waste to me.
Of course, I'll baby the thing until my kid puts the first dent on it. Then, it becomes just another mule.
-
Verified Tsikot Member
- Join Date
- May 2017
- Posts
- 572
-
Tsikoteer
- Join Date
- Jul 2009
- Posts
- 2,618
July 6th, 2017 04:16 PM #38
-
Verified Tsikot Member
- Join Date
- May 2017
- Posts
- 572
July 6th, 2017 04:17 PM #39Driving the latest Honda Pilot and it is a beast! haha Well the CUV is large both inside and out.... hence the most spacious 3rd row among all crossovers/SUVs IMO that's why I chose it. Then the V6 engine is so smooth and underlying power is just there whenever you wanna access it. Coming from an old diesel Fieldmaster, I actually have to control my feet from overly stepping on the gas pedal for Fuel efficiency. So far i'm averaging 12.5Km/L on highway driving and 9.0Km/L when mixed with city driving/traffic. Actually not bad for a V6.
-
July 6th, 2017 04:19 PM #40
depende sa location brad.
Sent from my SM-G935F using Tsikot Forums mobile app
That's weird. I've never experienced traffic on a Sunday Sent from my SM-M127F using Tapatalk
Traffic!