Quote Originally Posted by Wh1stl3r View Post
Wow, 11 seconds to 100? That's slower than some PPVs. The 2.0 2WD also felt lively only at the top end. It's good that Honda is finally bringing in the diesel turbo then. Finally we'll be getting much better low end grunt. Hopefully top end will be similar.
Well, only one or two PPVs, actually.

Some sites claim 9.6 to 10 seconds for the 0-100, but that's most likely them transposing 0-60 mph times to 0-100 km/h times.

Some people still don't understand that 100 km/h is 62 mph, not 60. In my testing, for cars in this speed range, that extra 2 km/h can be anywhere from half a second to an entire second. Sometimes even longer if the car shifts at just over 60 mph, as many do.


Quote Originally Posted by desmosedici View Post
Had a go one time in my FXT against a Sta. Fe one Sunday at the Skyway, just for fun. He was definitely over 180 when I passed him at just over 200 indicated.
Remember guys, speedometers are not exact. At 200 km/h, you have an error of around 10-20 km/h. (error typically 5-10 km/h at 100 km/h).

-

Wouldn't worry much about speed. That's not the CR-V's game, anyway. And the TOTL AWD should have the 158 hp (160 ps) version of the diesel, anyway.