2009 Honda City [ARCHIVED]

[roberto_minosa]

the bmw3 tail lights is still ugly for me, but not as bad in the pictures.

excited na makisakay e!
i personally like the new Jazz better, but compared to Vios, mas maganda cia ng di hamak.

Thank God I'm not alone!

I love the whole look of the front, but...

In my opinion, the rear is a total trash. The car has a long front end but the rear looks like it got rear-ended by a dump truck. It's just too damn short! The smooth lines coming from the front up to the C-pillar are cut abruptly with the trunk that suddenly disappeared. And the weird angles on the rear bumper-slash-ground effects thing won't make the rear look better. Since the front is a smooth rounded design, why did they make the rear of the body angular? I'm talking about the body. NOT the lights.

There's another problem. The wheels are too small. It's got the same proportion as putting in 14-inchers on a Chrysler 300C. Why make a ricey car without the ricey rims? If I would want to make the car look decent at the least, I would put in 18-inchers just for the sake of proportion.

I can't help but hate the side profile of the new City. I even hate it more than the last one. I'd have to say that the best City is still the Type-Z.

[kulitus]

Question : Mas lumaki ba ang body ng 2009 edition na City? If so, hindi kaya ma-underpower ang 1.3 na engine nito?

Thanks.

[JPG111]

2009 Honda City 1.5 E & 1.3 S

[JPG111]

1.5 E

[JPG111]

1.3 S

[JPG111]

Cost cutting?
rear tailgate

[Negus]

hala. halatang tinipid ah.

[Starex_Gold]

ok naman.. pero hindi ako masyadong satisfied dito sa City. wala man lang insulator kahit hi end model.. ang kipot pa ng tires nyan. sana man lang pareho nalang sila ng Jazz ng rims..

[oliver1013]

Tinipid man, madami parin bibili nyan dahil sa resale value at letter ets sa harap

Kaya dapat maging discerning tayong buyers para di lumaki ulo ng mga car manufacturers..

[eggman]

Ok naman ang new City ha...