inlaw's neighbor

[kevin3000]

daan lang siya sakto for cars btw property kasi siya nasa harap bahay ni mokong may property siya sa likod na binenta niya.. tendency nun dapat magbigay siya ng daan therefore ung inlaws ko bumili din ng lupa sa kanila para sa daanan.. di ko lang magets kung bakit nila kelangan maglagay ng pako

[chua_riwap]

i-check mo.
baka si ely pamatong yang neighbor nila.....

[black ice]

san banda yan SK kevs para maiwasan..hehehe.. baka naman Isuzu owner ung gumawa nyan..

[chua_riwap]

san banda yan SK kevs para maiwasan..hehehe.. baka naman Isuzu owner ung gumawa nyan..

dmax......:hysterical:

[black ice]

dmax......:hysterical:

di ako nagsabi nyan...

[yebo]

palagay ka ng camera sa kotse mo para kahit di mo makita mismo may record sa camera. tapos revies mo yung cam bago ka lumabas. pag naglagay ulit sya huwag na sa barangay kasi sabi mo tyuhin nya councilor dun. pulis na agad yan, padampot mo na agad.

[stickers]

sa pagkakaalam ko ang right of way hindi pwedeng ibenta, bilhin o patituluhan. malaking problema yan pag nagkakaso siguradong talo mga inlaws mo.

hindi kaya nakakasagabal kayo sa daanan kaya sila nagagalit?

Paps, right of way po yung tawag dun sa property na obligadong ibenta syo para makapunta ka sa property mo. halimbawa nga ni TS yung property ng inlaws nya na nasa likod ng property nung "kapitbahay lagay-pako Dmax tsikoteer daw". Although may mga right of way na hindi sakop ng titulo katulad nung mga nasa sidewalk or mga kalsada sa subd na bagong tayo at hindi basta basta pedeng ibenta dahil hindi mo ito pag-aari.

[box_type]

have you even tried talking to these people?

[kevin3000]

sa ugali nila ayoko kausapin yung mga ganun and madalang na naman ako pumunta hatid sundo lang si wifey dun

[vinj]

sa ugali nila ayoko kausapin yung mga ganun and madalang na naman ako pumunta hatid sundo lang si wifey dun

Baka naman in-laws mo yung nagpapa-pako sa kotse mo para mag stay ka naman.

[Ry_Tower]

Baka naman in-laws mo yung nagpapa-pako sa kotse mo para mag stay ka naman.

Oo nga naman. hehehe

[Sarsi]

baka naman niligawan nung anak nung naglagay ng pako yung asawa mo at nabasted, tapos nalaman nila na ikaw ang pinili kaya may galit sa yo

[ecneret]

ayos sa trip ah.. baka may saltik nga...

[kevin3000]

ewan ko iiwas nalang ako sa gulo gawin pa nila ulit hahagisan ko sila ng isang kilo ng pako

[beni23]

Ganian na ganian yung bahay namin dati when I was a kid, nasa likod at nung ayaw na kami bigyan ng right of way umalis kami at idinemanda ng tatay ko yung may-ari ng lupa. Ayun, my dad won the case and hindi ko na alam ang sumunod na nangyari. Ipa-blotter mo na yan bro.


Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk

[holdencaulfield]

martilyohin mo naman...

[ab_initio]

right of way ang binili?

Di naman libre ang easement of right of way. It may be established upon payment of compensation if the owner of the neighboring estate is not generous enough to give it for free. For the guidance of the readers, this right is governed by Articles 649-657 of the New Civil Code. In part, Art. 649 states:

Art. 649. The owner, or any person who by virtue of a real right may cultivate or use any immovable, which is surrounded by other immovables pertaining to other persons and without adequate outlet to a public highway, is entitled to demand a right of way through the neighboring estates, after payment of the proper indemnity.
Should this easement be established in such a manner that its use may be continuous for all the needs of the dominant estate, establishing a permanent passage, the indemnity shall consist of the value of the land occupied and the amount of the damage caused to the servient estate.

In case the right of way is limited to the necessary passage for the cultivation of the estate surrounded by others and for the gathering of its crops through the servient estate without a permanent way, the indemnity shall consist in the payment of the damage caused by such encumbrance.

This easement is not compulsory if the isolation of the immovable is due to the proprietor's own acts. (564a)

***The one needing the right of way is called the DOMINANT ESTATE, while the one obliged to give up a portion of his estate after payment of the proper indemnity is called the SERVIENT ESTATE.

This exercise or encroachment of prerogatives on the proprietary rights of private individuals is akin to the State's OR ITS AUTHORIZED AGENCY'S exercise of EMINENT DOMAIN.

To understand this better you read the accompanying articles.

I have handled a case like this where my client is the servient estate. We won the case because I was able to prove that the elements of Art. 650 are present. I took it pro bono against a nouveau riche litigant. You know how they sometimes behave. They forgot where they came from.

[kidgz]

baka walang kita ang Vulcanizing ni MOKONG

kaya pinapakoan ka sir Kevin

ingat na lang

[jon777]

Check mo, baka kasi naka Honda Civic SIR yan

[CoDer]

Di naman libre ang easement of right of way. It may be established upon payment of compensation if the owner of the neighboring estate is not generous enough to give it for free. For the guidance of the readers, this right is governed by Articles 649-657 of the New Civil Code. In part, Art. 649 states:

Art. 649. The owner, or any person who by virtue of a real right may cultivate or use any immovable, which is surrounded by other immovables pertaining to other persons and without adequate outlet to a public highway, is entitled to demand a right of way through the neighboring estates, after payment of the proper indemnity.
Should this easement be established in such a manner that its use may be continuous for all the needs of the dominant estate, establishing a permanent passage, the indemnity shall consist of the value of the land occupied and the amount of the damage caused to the servient estate.

In case the right of way is limited to the necessary passage for the cultivation of the estate surrounded by others and for the gathering of its crops through the servient estate without a permanent way, the indemnity shall consist in the payment of the damage caused by such encumbrance.

This easement is not compulsory if the isolation of the immovable is due to the proprietor's own acts. (564a)

***The one needing the right of way is called the DOMINANT ESTATE, while the one obliged to give up a portion of his estate after payment of the proper indemnity is called the SERVIENT ESTATE.

This exercise or encroachment of prerogatives on the proprietary rights of private individuals is akin to the State's OR ITS AUTHORIZED AGENCY'S exercise of EMINENT DOMAIN.

To understand this better you read the accompanying articles.

I have handled a case like this where my client is the servient estate. We won the case because I was able to prove that the elements of Art. 650 are present. I took it pro bono against a nouveau riche litigant. You know how they sometimes behave. They forgot where they came from.

Atty. in english please. Dumugo ang ilong ko sa post mo.