New and Used Car Talk Reviews Hot Cars Comparison Automotive Community

The Largest Car Forum in the Philippines

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 20 of 29
  1. Join Date
    Aug 2003
    Posts
    1,251
    #1
    I measured two different routes:

    Route A: 9.5 kms, total time it takes to travel, 20 minutes. Much less traffic, frequent fifth gear opportunities.

    Route B: 7 kms, total time it takes to travel, 30 minutes. Mainly 3rd gear, with occasional 4th gear, very few 5th gear.

    With fuel prices this high, which would be better, overall?

  2. Join Date
    Oct 2002
    Posts
    2,719
    #2
    Route A is more economical.

  3. Join Date
    Sep 2004
    Posts
    1,388
    #3
    the faster you can get to your destination the less fuel you use up. Look for routes with very few idles (traffic), start - stop, acceleration ... maganda routes na constant ang speed mo.

    oh, my answer is option (A)
    Last edited by albert_b; February 23rd, 2006 at 10:19 PM.

  4. Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Posts
    6,107
    #4
    Route A.

  5. Join Date
    Nov 2005
    Posts
    989
    #5
    Route A seems better.

  6. Join Date
    Nov 2002
    Posts
    1,726
    #6
    If you can maintain a steadier speed, then you get better economy. For sure A is the more efficient route.

  7. Join Date
    Oct 2002
    Posts
    233
    #7
    a is better

  8. Join Date
    Aug 2003
    Posts
    1,251
    #8
    how about incidental expenses, like tire wear, spare parts, plus the extra kilometers your car puts in. Yung binigay ko, one way lang, in my case, I get to travel those distances at least twice, sometimes up to 4 times a day, so at 4 times, the difference of 2.5km means extra 10 kms per day din, would it still be worth it?

  9. Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Posts
    196
    #9
    I choose "C"...take the bus. LOL

    I've always thought that the less time you spend in the lower gears the less fuel you end up using...choose "A".

  10. Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Posts
    4,865
    #10
    A din.

  11. Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Posts
    703
    #11
    Avg Speed on Route A = 28.5 km/h
    Avg Speed on Route B = 14 km/h

    if you have a mileage of 8km/l

    Consumption on Route A = 3.56L
    Consumption on Route B = 1.75L

    Which translates to double fuel consumption on Route A than on Route B. So in a month if you spend only the weekdays going through these routes back and forth....you'd spend 2.5k on gas on Route B, 5k on Route A (1L=36Pesos) but would be on the road 6 hours and 40 mins more on Route A than on Route B.

    So I chose "C" also

  12. Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Posts
    4,865
    #12
    teka bravoexo, you computed fuel consumption and speed? diba dapat consumption and distance?

  13. Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Posts
    2,329
    #13
    I choose neither. "C" is my answer.

  14. Join Date
    Oct 2002
    Posts
    15,528
    #14
    kala ko itong thread na ito eh pang cardio exercises eh. anyway, option a din ako. the 2 kms distance does not matter for you are frequently using the 5th gear.

  15. Join Date
    Aug 2003
    Posts
    9,720
    #15
    pagkakaalam ko, the more time you spend on the higher gears, much better for fuel economy.

    what's more, i'd rather drive traffic-free for 30 minutes. hell, i'd even enjoy it!

  16. Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Posts
    1,218
    #16
    Quote Originally Posted by Bravoexo
    if you have a mileage of 8km/l
    Wrong assumption. You don't assume the same mileage (km/li) for both routes. At 5th gear, your mpg (or km/li) is higher than on lower gears.
    Last edited by StraightSix; February 24th, 2006 at 10:20 AM.

  17. Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Posts
    39,174
    #17
    OptionA - less strain on the engine, clutch and transmission,- better on the car. Less tension, better on the driver.

    bravoexo - paki-recompute. thanks.

  18. Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Posts
    703
    #18
    <-- mali ba understanding ko ng ganito?

  19. Join Date
    Jul 2003
    Posts
    2,267
    #19
    what is ur opportunity cost of time???

    if the 10 minute difference will cost you ur job or any pending business deals, it is better to spend a little more money on gas, tire wear, etc.

    we should always include other imputed costs which we may usually overlook. ika nga, time is gold!!!

  20. Join Date
    Nov 2002
    Posts
    3,153
    #20
    route a would be better, less fuel consumption, less time as well, though the length of road travelled may be longer time spend is shorter

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
what's better, time vs distance