banggaan -- sino ang may kasalanan? (animation inside)

[omallares]

sino po ang may kasalanan dito? take note hindi sila nagkakitaan dahil don sa itim na suv.

[BlueBimmer]

gray turning car may kasalanan since sya yung merging car...yata

[onat_1]

yung red car ang sa tingin ko ang may kasalanan kasi speeding siya,lalo na kung yang area na yan merong designated U-turn slot dapat proceed with caution ang diskarte.

[istan]

Yep, right of way yun red car e. Sana wag na pinalampas ng grey car sa kabilang lane yun bumper nya.

[VtEC]

obviously yong gray car.

[ooba99]

Ako, tinging ko, gray car ang me kasalanan kc nag encrouch siya sa lane ng red car.

[the_wildthing]

Gray car. He cannot take up the outer lane.

[Auto_Xer]

sino po ang may kasalanan dito? take note hindi sila nagkakitaan dahil don sa itim na suv.

Gray car he has the least right of way.
He should have let the black vehicle pass first no matter how slow it was given where it(black) was at the point in time when the gray car started to make the U turn.

[alwayz_yummy]

alam ko, lahat ng merging vehicles should YIELD..

[j_avonni]

It's a close call. But, I think the grey car was the one who hit the red car. Hence, the former was at fault.

Under the same scenario, if the red car was the one who hit the grey, though the latter encroached on the outer lane, it's the red car's fault.

I think the rule is "who hits who".



:eat: [SIZE="1"]3129[/SIZE]

[omallares]

I think the rule is "who hits who".

sa animation po, halos ganon ang nangyari. you can't determine who hits who. makikita na lang po siguro sa damage. yon pong red car, starting from the side of the bumper yung tama (note, hindi sa front ng bumper). buong fender ang may damage saka may konting tama din yung door. the red car driver was able to turn the car a bit to the right kaya hindi tumuloy sa door yung damage.

sa gray car naman, di mo rin malaman kung saan tinamaan dahil nadurog yung bumper (it's a private fx).

btw, it's along imelda ave papuntang junction from sta. lucia mall.

sino ka ba dun?

ako yung nasa red car. i do admit that i'm also at fault. i think each of us (the other driver) thought that we're at fault that time kaya di na kami nagpa-police report. pareho siguro kaming nagiisip na mas malaki ang gastos pag isang side lang ang magbabayad lahat. but we agreed on helping each other with the expenses. mabait naman kausap.

yesterday, i found out by reading here in tsikot that the car on a highway has the right of way. kaya ginawan ko ng animation.

anyway, pwede ko pa bang habulin yung driver ng gray car? i have his contact number. kaya lang wala kaming police report. wala ring picture don sa scene.

[chain]

definitely the gray vehicle. siya yung merging and encroaching eh.

did you guys sign anything at all after the accident? o gentleman's agreement lang? anyway, you might have difficulties kung ngayon ka pa lang maghahabol.

AFAIK, dapat may police report ka dapat. helps in facilitating the process in ruling out who's at fault.

[etneroll]

obviously, gray car is at fault...when U-turning, do it with caution...specially, that another car has already blocked the view of the on coming red car...

[mbeige]

Grey car.

The vehicle making a left turn, or a U-turn in an open intersection (without stoplights) should yield. The grey car is the one entering the red car's path/lane, therefore it should yield.

How I despise those who make U turns and still want to go first! Rant mode off...

[BLINGBLING]

It's a close call. But, I think the grey car was the one who hit the red car. Hence, the former was at fault.

Under the same scenario, if the red car was the one who hit the grey, though the latter encroached on the outer lane, it's the red car's fault.

I think the rule is "who hits who".



:eat: [SIZE=1]3129[/SIZE]

same judgment..
malalaman yun sa tama sa sasakyan..like the t/s said, the hit mark on the his car started on the side of the bumper so that means he was ahead of the other car at collision point..
sabi nga nila in street lingo: "ngusuan lang yan!" ..and more often than not that's how it is called..

[mbeige]

The other party may have said not to make a police report because he knew he was at fault. Just a head's up to you.

[Taurus]

same judgment..
malalaman yun sa tama sa sasakyan..like the t/s said, the hit mark on the his car started on the side of the bumper so that means he was ahead of the other car at collision point..
sabi nga nila in street lingo: "ngusuan lang yan!" ..and more often than not that's how it is called..

I totally disagree with this statement, drivers tend to speed up then butt in their bumpers ahead so they may cut in, resulting on some unnecessary incidents. Yielding is the most appropriate term.

Gray FX car is at fault.

[leinahtan]

Both is to blame.
The grey car should have let the black car passed since she was turning on a u-turn slot and proceeded when the lane is well clear.
The red car should have slowed a bit if she noticed the black car halted, by doing so meron pa syang stopping distance thus avoiding the grey car.
Sometimes you have to deviate from the rules to avoid untoward incidents.

[restituto]

In defensive driving right-of-way is not always right. Its more on preventing accidents. Was the accident preventable? Yes! The control is on the driver. Think defensive...don't insist on the right-of-way thing.

Both is at fault...

[jvdejesus05]

obviously its the gray car... he should be turning with caution plus lane lang dapat ng black car yung maoccupy nya...