mr. alegre, you're back! i remember you so i hope you also remember me. but just in case you forgot, ako yung maraming tanong na hindi mo masagot nuon. napikon ka pa nga yata. anyway, hello. and here we are again!

for starters...

i doubt it if a feature demo by gma7 or abs-cbn can bolster any claims made by you, alam naman nating lahat how stupid those media people are di ba. would they really know the difference e saksakan ng bobo yang mga nasa gma at abs-cbn! besides, philippine media opinions are always for sale! we would not treat that feature any different from a paid advertisement on tv. and please don't tell us about their reputations as "credible" people, they are not and never will be. what credentials would they have to evaluate such a technical item??? they are experts in mass communications, not engineering. if ever they will just be creating hype, period.

nag-post kana dati dito e. it's the same thing, a venturi device that as claimed by you increases horsepower, fuel efficiency and decreases emissions. you did not in any way answer my questions then. i will repeat those questions again in case you forgot.

1. how will it oxidize the HC and CO when the exhaust gas is already below the ignition temperatures required? as per the email you sent me several months ago, there are no catalysts inside the ego. so how does it innitiate further oxidation then???

2. the device sucks in air and mixes it with the flue gas (that means exhaust gas, for those who are not familiar with the term). does this not explain the reduction of the "percentage" of HC and CO, since you are in fact increasing the amount of gases? 1+1 = 2, flue gas + air = [flue gas AND air]. it merely dilutes the amount of HC and CO since you are adding air to it, does it not???

results produced from an exhaust gas analyzer would be misleading and useless as the percentages will actually go down after air is infused, any mechanical engineer worth his salt can tell you that.

what i want to see here is the actual moles of HC and CO before and after it passes through your device, NOT THE PERCENTAGES. molal count per kg of flue gas produced before and after the device will give us a more definitive indication that there is in fact a reduction in the HC and CO. this means that a sample of flue gas will need to be analyzed as to moles of HC and CO, then passed through your device, then analyzed again. what needs to be seen is if the actual amount of HC and CO did decrease, not the percentage.

3. how in this world does a device, connected at the end of the tail pipe, increase an engine's power output and efficiency? if it does anything to the engine it only restricts the exhaust. does that not in fact decrease power and efficiency, the exact reverse of what you claim??? since the infussion of more air means the engine needs to push out more mass, how does that decrease the exhaust pressure???

pasensya na if i might seem putting you down. but i am a technical person by training so i must question you again and again until i am satisfied with the answers. if not then i am sorry as i am duty bound by my profession to share my opinions in matters like these (read this as "expose a fraud", so please do defend your claims).

btw, your website does not explain anything. please do not think of people here in tsikot (or even in kotse) as simple (as in simple minded), we are not. advertisements of a technical nature must be that, technical. you are not offering to sell us shampoo or herbal remedies, so please give us details and explain things to us in scientific terms. like giving us the schematic diagram and chemical process, complete with reaction temperatures involved in your invention for starters. sales pitches do not go very far in this forum, sir.