Blackbox DVR/Dashcam

[glenn manikis]

Yung sakin Sjcam.. Nabilad sa Araw without tint.. Nag warp yung harap.. At lumobo battery..

[b_9904]

double post :s

[b_9904]

kelan nag kokompute ng speed ang mga opisyal? alam lang nila paano mag compute sa discount ng kokotongin.

wag na tayo maglokohan, wide street vs narrow street at low light. syempre mas malinaw ang kuha sa narrow street dahil focused at nagrereflect yung ilaw sa headlight sa mga nearby structures kaya mas madali ma absorb ng lens. kakalubog pa ng araw (6pm) sa kuha transcend versus late in the evening (9pm) na yung sa sj.

7k vs 3k+ na sjcam? bili ka nalang ng dalawa sj may rear cam ka pa at may dalawang action ka para sa mga outing mo. yan ang punto. overpriced ang transcend sa presyong binabayaran mo.

Hindi naman tayo naglolokohan eh. Wala naman ako pinaglalaban re: which video of better eh. Pinost ko yan para hindi na mag search mga bro and sis natin dito sa tiskot. pero.... push mo lang yang kung ano man tinutulak mo.

BUT!

Saang batas nga yang sinasabi mong quits na kayo. Turo mo naman saakin please :D

Saan nag cocompute? SA KORTE! Yung mga abugado yan isyu nila pag may video lagi. Hula ko lang ha, hindi kapa tumapak sa loob ng korte sa mga ganitong kaso?

So malamang yang quits mo na yan sa enforcer yan o sa presinto? Tama ba ako? If so, mali po yan.

I KNOW IT FOR A FACT in THEORY and PRACTICE!

[benchman]

I guess mahal yung nabilihan nyo ng 220. I friend of mine got it for 5650 only.

mura nga. mind to share where he bought it?
thanks!

[artsky]

The thing I like about Transcend DP220 is that it prevents me from over speeding. Sinet ko na mag alert sya kapag lumagpas ako ng certain speed and I think it also helps in me saving gas without constantly looking at my speedometer.

Gamit ko dati is yung Galaxy S5 ko and it records very clear videos day and night kaso hindi wide angle yung lens nya and dahil mabigat sya, panay ang vibrate nya while in motion resulting to blurry videos. Ilang beses na din syang nahulog hehe. Ang delikado nyan is pag sa collision baka maging deadly flying object pa sya. The battery also gets hot while in use at nabibilad pa sa araw yung phone.

[artsky]

The thing I like about Transcend DP220 is that it prevents me from over speeding. Sinet ko na mag alert sya kapag lumagpas ako ng certain speed and I think it also helps in me saving gas without constantly looking at my speedometer.

Gamit ko dati is yung Galaxy S5 ko and it records very clear videos day and night kaso hindi wide angle yung lens nya and dahil mabigat sya, panay ang vibrate nya while in motion resulting to blurry videos. Ilang beses na din syang nahulog hehe. Ang delikado nyan is pag sa collision baka maging deadly flying object pa sya. The battery also gets hot while in use at nabibilad pa sa araw yung phone.

[luis_]

Hindi naman tayo naglolokohan eh. Wala naman ako pinaglalaban re: which video of better eh. Pinost ko yan para hindi na mag search mga bro and sis natin dito sa tiskot. pero.... push mo lang yang kung ano man tinutulak mo.

BUT!

Saang batas nga yang sinasabi mong quits na kayo. Turo mo naman saakin please :D

Saan nag cocompute? SA KORTE! Yung mga abugado yan isyu nila pag may video lagi. Hula ko lang ha, hindi kapa tumapak sa loob ng korte sa mga ganitong kaso?

So malamang yang quits mo na yan sa enforcer yan o sa presinto? Tama ba ako? If so, mali po yan.

I KNOW IT FOR A FACT in THEORY and PRACTICE!

May case na ba na nag compute talaga? Parang ang hirap ata nun kasi napakalaki ng margin of error dahil konting offset lang ng distance laki na ng difference sa speed.

[b_9904]

May case na ba na nag compute talaga? Parang ang hirap ata nun kasi napakalaki ng margin of error dahil konting offset lang ng distance laki na ng difference sa speed.

Meron na po. Ako pa mismo nag compute.

Madali lang naman yan eh: Mag occular ka to measure the distances and look at the video for time stamps, OR ask for admissions on the distance and time stamps in the video. Yun na lahat ng kelangan mo para ma-compute and speed (speed = distance / time)

[b_9904]

double post

[wewoy_romero]

cool lang tayo

[luis_]

Meron na po. Ako pa mismo nag compute.

Madali lang naman yan eh: Mag occular ka to measure the distances and look at the video for time stamps, OR ask for admissions on the distance and time stamps in the video. Yun na lahat ng kelangan mo para ma-compute and speed (speed = distance / time)

Ah siguro depende nga siguro kung gaano mo paglalaban speed mo. Iniisip ko pa lang kasi parang nakakatamad na mag sukat. Kailangan kasi punta ka sa same place same lane o humanap ng reference point, dala ka surveyors wheel, mag trolley, sampling mo pa siguro every 1 second dahil di constant ang speed. Ang 1 meter offset mo = 3.6km/hr na difference. Ang speed pa ng speedometer vs actual na sukat baka nasa 5km/hr. Buti na convince mo sir.

[b_9904]

Ah siguro depende nga siguro kung gaano mo paglalaban speed mo. Iniisip ko pa lang kasi parang nakakatamad na mag sukat. Kailangan kasi punta ka sa same place same lane o humanap ng reference point, dala ka surveyors wheel, mag trolley, sampling mo pa siguro every 1 second dahil di constant ang speed. Ang 1 meter offset mo = 3.6km/hr na difference. Ang speed pa ng speedometer vs actual na sukat baka nasa 5km/hr. Buti na convince mo sir.

Thanks for that may natutunan ako na pwede kong gamitin hehehehe

UNLESS accurate speed is relevant an material to the issues under consideration, the opposing counsel will object to that.

Here is how we do it:

1) If speed is a non-issue, do not do it.
2) If speed contributed to, or played a role in, the accident, consider it but approximation of the speed only.
a) If you see the car braking, note when he braked.
b) If he did not, just get the approximate speed before the collision.
c) simple computations only with simple approximation of distance and the time stamp a FEW (5 max) seconds before the collision.
d) then make your argument for or against the contribution, or the role speed played in the accident.

Understand, speed as computed and offered in court need not be that accurate. It is what you use the speed for that determines the issues.

Final point, you could be going 100KPH along Commonwealth and still avoid any liability on your part, or the liability could be on the other party.

Yung computation ko nga walang occular yun, based on admissions lang at sa time stamp. At the end of the day, hindi nga nagamit yung speed na yun ng nag decide yung korte.

[b_9904]

Ah siguro depende nga siguro kung gaano mo paglalaban speed mo. Iniisip ko pa lang kasi parang nakakatamad na mag sukat. Kailangan kasi punta ka sa same place same lane o humanap ng reference point, dala ka surveyors wheel, mag trolley, sampling mo pa siguro every 1 second dahil di constant ang speed. Ang 1 meter offset mo = 3.6km/hr na difference. Ang speed pa ng speedometer vs actual na sukat baka nasa 5km/hr. Buti na convince mo sir.

Thanks for that may natutunan ako na pwede kong gamitin hehehehe

UNLESS accurate speed is relevant an material to the issues under consideration, the opposing counsel will object to that.

Here is how we do it:

1) If speed is a non-issue, do not do it.
2) If speed contributed to, or played a role in, the accident, consider it but approximation of the speed only.
a) If you see the car braking, note when he braked.
b) If he did not, just get the approximate speed before the collision.
c) simple computations only with simple approximation of distance and the time stamp a FEW (5 max) seconds before the collision.
d) then make your argument for or against the contribution, or the role speed played in the accident.

Understand, speed as computed and offered in court need not be that accurate. It is what you use the speed for that determines the issues.

Final point, you could be going 100KPH along Commonwealth and still avoid any liability on your part, or the liability could be on the other party.

Yung computation ko nga walang occular yun, based on admissions lang at sa time stamp. At the end of the day, hindi nga nagamit yung speed na yun ng nag decide yung korte.

[wewoy_romero]

so gps, speedometer, and other bells and whistles aside, alin ang pinakamalinaw na dashcam for night? basta yun lang ang consideration: night driving!

[b_9904]

Go back 2pages and watch in 720p ikaw na mag decide bro

[b_9904]

so gps, speedometer, and other bells and whistles aside, alin ang pinakamalinaw na dashcam for night? basta yun lang ang consideration: night driving!

Ah night pala, hindi ko din alam bro. Google mo nalang mga ganun dashcam

[sirLancelot]

Worth it na kaya yung nasa blade na transcend? Worth 7k

[b_9904]

Worth it na kaya yung nasa blade na transcend? Worth 7k

Saakin oo, pero sa iba sj4000 sagot nila sayo.

[b_9904]

Worth it na kaya yung nasa blade na transcend? Worth 7k

Saakin oo, pero sa iba sj4000 sagot nila sayo.

[wewoy_romero]

akin kasi sj4000 gamit ko. daytime walang problema. linaw talaga kahit 720p lang gamit ko at hindi yung full resolution. pero sa gabi, hindi ganun ka liwanag sa sides dahil na rin siguro sa medium tint ko. PERO adjust exposure to +1 to +2, compensated na sa gabi. pangit lang kasi pag ginamit mo naman ganyang settings during daytime, overexposed naman kaya puro puti yung langit.