New and Used Car Talk Reviews Hot Cars Comparison Automotive Community

The Largest Car Forum in the Philippines

Page 2 of 3 FirstFirst 123 LastLast
Results 11 to 20 of 23
  1. Join Date
    Oct 2002
    Posts
    15,528
    #11
    why not the Vios? its too small. and i don't like the front part.
    why not the City? its because the rear part looks like a cockroach, and the new city will be coming out soon.

  2. Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Posts
    12,361
    #12
    Quote Originally Posted by tidus1203 View Post
    Because here taxis and police cars are almost always in beaten condition. Dents here, rust there, and the inside its almost always wrecked so there is a perception that cars used for taxis here are cheap. Also here, unlike there, there are the HAVES (people who can afford a car) and the HAVE NOT's (people who only commute since they can;t afford a car). So the HAVE NOT's can always say they have ride a Vios but they can never say they have ride a City. So it gives this exclusivity feeling. Dunno if you understand what I am trying to get into but basically thats the gist of it why taxis are looked down on here.
    I get it, sort of. I guess it's not peculiar to Pinoys then. We have them here too. The only difference is they set the bar a bit higher. For these snooty types, their image car is something in the same mold as Maseratis or something.

    That said, pound for pound, those two cars seem like a dead heat to me. I myself would have a hard time deciding which one among the two I'd pick.

    Heh. Just go with the flow. Honda!

    In hindsight, I'd pick whoever can give me a better deal.
    Last edited by Jun aka Pekto; August 26th, 2008 at 09:23 PM.

  3. #13
    Why not Vios 1.3E - kase manual pa to hehe... although nka power windows na tsaka alloy rims na yta. Unlike yung City 1.3S CVT na sha... all powered na rin tsaka alloy rims. Sarap i-drive ng CVT...pwede ka mag drive kahit isang kamay lang..tapos yung isa kamay naka-hawak sa chin... nagpapa cute hehehe :D

    Why not City 1.3S - a new City will be coming out soon. Mahal daw maintenance. Pag antukin ka sa byahe wag ito kunin mo...delicado...super smooth sha i-drive (CVT kse) bka makatulog ka. Pati steering wheel...walang ka-effort effort :D

  4. Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Posts
    1,011
    #14
    Quote Originally Posted by tidus1203 View Post
    Because here taxis and police cars are almost always in beaten condition. Dents here, rust there, and the inside its almost always wrecked so there is a perception that cars used for taxis here are cheap. Also here, unlike there, there are the HAVES (people who can afford a car) and the HAVE NOT's (people who only commute since they can;t afford a car). So the HAVE NOT's can always say they have ride a Vios but they can never say they have ride a City. So it gives this exclusivity feeling. Dunno if you understand what I am trying to get into but basically thats the gist of it why taxis are looked down on here.

    I've never ridden a chery qq, i guess QQs are more "exclusive" than a vios then...

    the hondas not being used as taxis is simply a matter of policy. a policy shaped by the very mentality of the people it's meant to enslave.

    hondas aren't any more/less "exclusive" than toyotas. period. anyone disagreeing is honda's bitch hehehhehe
    Last edited by Psylocke; August 27th, 2008 at 11:35 PM.

  5. Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Posts
    17
    #15
    Quote Originally Posted by Psylocke View Post
    I've never ridden a chery qq, i guess QQs are more "exclusive" than a vios then...

    the hondas not being used as taxis is simply a matter of policy. a policy shaped by the very mentality of the people it's meant to enslave.

    hondas aren't any more/less "exclusive" than toyotas. period. anyone disagreeing is honda's bitch hehehhehe
    i agree to you sir.
    vios 1.3M/T: interior not good compared sa City.
    City 1.3M/T: back/rear not appealing.

    i took 2008vios 1.3E kasi naka-airbag sa driver side saka naka-abs. i don't know kung yung City 1.3M/T have the same. saka i love toyota. . . no restrictions on how i will use it kasi binayaran ko naman. . . it always feels good to be free.

    salamat po.

  6. Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Posts
    617
    #16
    why not vios: center gauge cluster
    why not city: a little more and you'll get the civic

  7. Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Posts
    35
    #17
    thanks peeps sa mga sumagot..so minor lang pala ang differences nila...

  8. Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Posts
    421
    #18
    Vios=kinda cramped
    top end model near the altis price already (then go for the altis, it has better chasis)
    FC is just a bit better than the altis in city driving


    City=CVT durability issues
    top end model near the civic price already (then go for the civic, it has better chasis)
    FC is just a bit better than the civic in city driving

  9. Join Date
    Oct 2002
    Posts
    29,354
    #19
    City=CVT durability issues
    If you're getting the City/Jazz, the manual tranny models are the best option for both durability & good FC.

  10. Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Posts
    177
    #20
    why not vios = because it looks like a clown
    why not city = because its old

    go for jazz or the new city..

Page 2 of 3 FirstFirst 123 LastLast
Why Not Vios and Why Not the City; the disadvantage