Why Not Vios and Why Not the City; the disadvantage

**mm15744** · December 14th, 2008 01:49 PM

my friend told me that he likes my city 06 rather than new city '09, as for him '09 city is like a cyborg (oo nga naman), city '06 to '08 body are more classic, simple and elegant kaya kahit in future uso pa rin sya at disente...

my 2 cents...

**av8or5** · December 14th, 2008 02:26 PM

here are my opinions:

why not vios = center cluster for speedometer, tachometer, etc
why not city = older version of this model name looks much better than the current look

Statement ko: when the current city came out, it didn't really sell well. why? it is due to the looks. what honda did...they had tie ups with banks and other companies, dropped the price.. finally it was sold.. tagged as "value for the money" in exchange for the ugly look.

so between the two, ill choose vios. the look, durability, peppy little engine over exceed vios.

**gonzo** · December 14th, 2008 03:32 PM

My opinion;

Why not City = exterior design I dont like
Why not vios = Having hard time e pasok sa reverse gear at dead stop.

BTW I own 2006 MT kaya alam ko bat hirap e kambyo.