
Originally Posted by
niky
space?
- The Fortuner has better shaped seats in the second and third row (second row is especially comfortable), but knee room in the third row is so-so.
- The Everest's third row seat is very close to the floor, making it uncomfortable... but the thin third row seats give it better cargo room. It's also easier to load... the Fortuner lacks stepboards on the rear bumper.
the ride?
I'd be lying if I said the Everest's ride was gentle, but I find it a bit more comfortable than the Fortuner's. The Fortuner has extremely stiff springs. The Everest is somewhat softer.
The stiffness gives the Fortuner exceptional handling, though... but both vehicles are equipped with rather slippery tires.
interior amenities/looks?
The Fortuner's interior is kind of baduy. The Everest's interior looks nice, but the plastic is cheap... possibly cheaper than the Fortuner's, but both have plastics of despicable quality.
expected problems?
Toyota promises no more D4D problems with the reprogram. I believe them. Ford uses a better CRDi system, but the ability of their transmissions to stand up to the strain is an unknown.
after sales service?
Ford has better service, usually. There are some good Toyota dealers out there, but there are lots of service advisors who'll try to pull a fast one on you.
availability of parts?
Don't expect D4D parts to be widely available and cheap... Most CRDi parts are expensive, and the injectors are not cheap to make or market. You're stuck buying whatever injectors came with the engine stock, once they start reacting to local fuel quality, some 150,000 - 300,000 kms down the line.
Suspension parts for the Toyota might be widely available, though... especially springs... because of the aforementioned super-stiff backache-inducing stock springs.
There are quite a few Banaue places that carry Ford parts for Ford/Mazda products like the Lynx, Ranger and Everest. Not as many as for Toyota, but they're there and prices are fair.
-----
Overall, I prefer the Everest, but the Fortuner 3.0 4x4 is a nice vehicle... wouldn't like to ride in the second row of either vehicle, but I'd give the Everest the advantage there.
The third row is pure purgatory. You're not buying these cars to carry seven people, okay? If that's what you need, get an Innova, Carnival or Starex.... heck, get a Santa Fe!
I like the Everest's engines and transmissions much better. The Fortuner's automatics are pretty horrible. The Everest's engines are snappier, and the 5-speed automatic is great in traffic. The Everest's rear-LSD is perfect for off-roading, and the wheel-wells will take bigger rubber than the Fortuner's will (so you can put mud tires on much more easily).
The Everest's steering feel is pretty good, but there's too much body-roll for my tastes. The Fortuner feels more secure, more planted. The steering is pretty numb, in true Toyota fashion, but the Fortuner handles very well for a truck. Brakes? I'd give it to the Everest, but I've never found reason to complain about the Fort's... as long as you don't drive stupid, you won't find them lacking.
As for looks... the Fortuner definitely looks better... but it's kind of common. The Everest looks old-fashioned, but that suits its off-road abilities perfectly.
Depends on your priorities. I'd get either of these for a personal toy, but not as a serious family car.