New and Used Car Talk Reviews Hot Cars Comparison Automotive Community

The Largest Car Forum in the Philippines

Results 1 to 20 of 41

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. Join Date
    Jun 2015
    Posts
    2,751
    #1
    Someone here said the S-presso is an Alto on stilts. I drove behind one last weekend and, yes (from the rear at least), it does look like a small, narrow car with disproportionately tall tires. I was expecting na medyo small SUV ang dating, but no.

  2. Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Posts
    54,619
    #2
    Quote Originally Posted by WallyWest View Post
    Someone here said the S-presso is an Alto on stilts. I drove behind one last weekend and, yes (from the rear at least), it does look like a small, narrow car with disproportionately tall tires. I was expecting na medyo small SUV ang dating, but no.
    one h as to see it at a certain angle..
    the orange model seen at 30 degrees from the front, seems to be its more flattering angle.
    i wonder, does it topple over on extreme driving (e.g., fail the moose test) ?
    Last edited by dr. d; January 20th, 2021 at 02:54 AM.

  3. Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Posts
    2,808
    #3
    Tire size difference isn't that big.

    S-Presso 175/70 R14

    Celerio/Wigo/Mirage etc. 175/65 R14

    The difference is something like 3% or 7/10th of an inch (17mm) taller tires.

    Can probably swap tires with similar small cars and very few people would even notice -- kinda like how '90s sedan owners would change out 195/55R15 for 195/50R15 and the car looks mostly the same unless you're really looking for it.

    Quote Originally Posted by Rao Shaheryar View Post
    Celerio is better than S-Presso I think celerio ground clearance is better than S-Presso
    my vote is for Celerio
    Celerio ground clearance 165mm

    S-Presso ground clearance 180mm

    8-9mm comes from taller tires, the other 6mm from raised suspension.
    Last edited by Dr.Kamiya; January 20th, 2021 at 02:57 AM.

  4. Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Posts
    54,619
    #4
    Quote Originally Posted by Dr.Kamiya View Post
    Tire size difference isn't that big.

    S-Presso 175/70 R14

    Celerio/Wigo/Mirage etc. 175/65 R14

    The difference is something like 3% or 7/10th of an inch (17mm) taller tires.

    Can probably swap tires with similar small cars and very few people would even notice -- kinda like how '90s sedan owners would change out 195/55R15 for 195/50R15 and the car looks mostly the same unless you're really looking for it.
    tinatamad nakong mag research.
    how's the ground clearance figures difference between the alto and celerio, and the spresso?

  5. Join Date
    Nov 2017
    Posts
    563
    #5
    Quote Originally Posted by dr. d View Post
    tinatamad nakong mag research.
    how's the ground clearance figures difference between the alto and celerio, and the spresso?
    the indian spec alto(similar to the previous ph k10) is said to have 160mm while the pakistan spec with the 660cc seems to have 170mm of groundclearance.

    celerio 145mm
    mirage 160mm
    wigo 180mm apparently
    brio 137mm
    picanto 151mm
    almera 150mm

  6. Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Posts
    54,619
    #6
    if the spresso has a ground clearance of 180 mm, and the celerio has 145,
    the difference of 35 mm is 1.4 inches.

    for practical everyday use,
    would 1.4 inches be much of a decision-changer...?

  7. Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Posts
    2,808
    #7
    I don't think ride height is a game changer, but they are basically the same car and come in at nearly the same price. (I believe S-Presso M/T is actually cheaper than the Celerio M/T).

    At the end it all comes down to buyer preference, and so far our market seems to be favoring taller SUV-ish vehicles.

  8. Join Date
    Nov 2017
    Posts
    563
    #8
    Quote Originally Posted by dr. d View Post
    if the spresso has a ground clearance of 180 mm, and the celerio has 145,
    the difference of 35 mm is 1.4 inches.

    for practical everyday use,
    would 1.4 inches be much of a decision-changer...?
    Depending on how soft the suspension is on both probably either mas matagtag ung celerio or mas less prone sumabit si spresso.

    180mm seems a bit too much though for a city hatchback.The Revo makes due with 175mm(granted likely sa rear diff kinuha ung measurement na yon) and has to carry 10.

  9. Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Posts
    2,808
    #9
    180mm on a monocoque shouldn't be too much of a climb to get inside the cabin.

    The Revo naman kasi that 175mm is only to the lowest hanging part (which as you said is likely to be the rear diff cover), after that naka patong pa the frame, and then the body itself so medyo mataas talaga aakyatin mo to get into the car.

  10. Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Posts
    2,808
    #10
    Ground clearance of CUVs, for example:


  11. Join Date
    Nov 2017
    Posts
    563
    #11
    Quote Originally Posted by Dr.Kamiya View Post
    180mm on a monocoque shouldn't be too much of a climb to get inside the cabin.

    The Revo naman kasi that 175mm is only to the lowest hanging part (which as you said is likely to be the rear diff cover), after that naka patong pa the frame, and then the body itself so medyo mataas talaga aakyatin mo to get into the car.
    just remembered hitching a ride in a 1.2 suzuki swift and ingress was ok with its 170mm ground clearance another 10mm wont matter.

Tags for this Thread

Suzuki MT City Car: S-Presso vs. Celerio