New and Used Car Talk Reviews Hot Cars Comparison Automotive Community

The Largest Car Forum in the Philippines

Page 2 of 6 FirstFirst 123456 LastLast
Results 11 to 20 of 51
  1. Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Posts
    2,380
    #11
    like the crv/forester thread...

    still performance over looks... forester parin

  2. Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Posts
    6,105
    #12
    Forester 2.5XT Turbo

  3. Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Posts
    2,421
    #13
    Quote Originally Posted by HyBrideVo View Post
    i like 'em both

    hbv, are you referring to you avatar?

  4. Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Posts
    1,620
    #14
    Quote Originally Posted by FXT View Post
    i like 'em both too.

    Are you referring to my avatar too?

    Stop staring at them will ya :evillaugh

  5. Join Date
    May 2004
    Posts
    77
    #15
    It's funny to note that the Subaru Forester was mentioned in a total of 51 separate threads and was directly compared with other vehicles here:
    03-15-2007 Subaru Forester vs Mitsubishi Outlander
    03-29-2007 Honda CR-V or Subaru Forester
    04-09-2007 Legacy Limited vs. Forester XT
    04-09-2007 Mazda6 2.3L or Subaru Forester 2.5XT
    02-25-2007 Hyundai Tucson 2.0CRDI VS Subaru 2.0 Forester XT
    10-24-2006 Impreza Sti vs. Forester Sti Video
    10-02-2006 nissan X-TRAIL vs honda CR-V vs subaru FORESTER
    09-26-2006 XTRAIL vs. FORESTER vs. ESCAPE vs. MONTERO SPORT
    12-10-2005 bat wala masyadong forester 2nd hand


  6. Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Posts
    65
    #16
    For a more objective assessment of the two vehicles, I suggest looking at this site:
    http://www.consumerreports.org/cro/c...507_suv_ov.htm

    Hope this would make this forum more informative and less emotional. I still root for the Forester because of the good handling, Mercedes-like ride as described in the March 2007 issue of C-Magazine, where they picked the Forester as its top 5-passenger compact SUV. Never fails me in a stop-light drag, especially on 2nd gear...

  7. Join Date
    Feb 2004
    Posts
    863
    #17
    If compared with the Forrester Turbo, I think I'd still go for the Outlander.

    Outlander looks nicer in and out (subjective), better ground clearance, more spacious interior, and cheaper by almost 200k.

    The Forrester will probably have better handling and feel but its not everything I guess.

  8. Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Posts
    866
    #18
    For me it doesn't matter

    As I've said in my earlier post, wala pa rin laban ang new CR-V sa mga ito.

    Noisy and high-vibrating 2.4 liter variant (using the old-school K24A engine), no standard 4WD/AWD on lower variants and the "slushbox" doesn't have manual mode (yet the Forester and New Outlander have these as standard equipment )

    Worst part is that the bucktooth grill is damn fugly.

    The CR-V is gonna be a boring vehicle for me (like it predecessor models)

  9. Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Posts
    2,421
    #19
    overall, i'd probably still pick the Forester XT over the Outlander, but the Outlander's 6-Speed Sportronic transmission with paddle shifters and 650 watts Rockford Fosgate sound system sure are ***y.

  10. Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Posts
    1,620
    #20
    If only they had the Mitsubishi Airtrek Turbo (outlander) here in the US i would have bought that over the Fozzie. Still i like 'em both newer and older versions





    Last edited by HyBrideVo; April 16th, 2007 at 10:17 AM.

Page 2 of 6 FirstFirst 123456 LastLast
Subaru Forester vs Mitsubishi Outlander