New and Used Car Talk Reviews Hot Cars Comparison Automotive Community

The Largest Car Forum in the Philippines

Page 1 of 3 123 LastLast
Results 1 to 20 of 51
  1. Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Posts
    224
    #1
    I need a comparison of this two, base on all aspects. TY

  2. Join Date
    May 2006
    Posts
    655
    #2
    Expect some Forester Fanbois to flood this thread.

  3. Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Posts
    1,619
    #3
    i like 'em both

  4. Join Date
    May 2006
    Posts
    655
    #4
    Quote Originally Posted by HyBrideVo View Post
    i like 'em both
    wusssshuuuuu

  5. Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Posts
    1,619
    #5
    Quote Originally Posted by bunge View Post
    wusssshuuuuu
    amf... :bwahaha:

  6. Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Posts
    866
    #6
    Quote Originally Posted by HyBrideVo View Post
    i like 'em both
    Same here.

    They both have standard 4WD/AWD across the board and they are both waaaaay better than the cheap-ass CR-V (the new one)

  7. Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Posts
    2,421
    #7
    i like 'em both too.

  8. Join Date
    May 2006
    Posts
    655
    #8
    Quote Originally Posted by FXT View Post
    i like 'em both too.
    play safe yata mga fanbois ngayon :bwahaha:

  9. Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Posts
    2,421
    #9
    wushu, bunge, kunwari ka pa. closet fanboi ka rin naman eh.

  10. Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Posts
    3,346
    #10
    For me, kung Daily Driven - Subaru Forester.
    Reasons - Because Subaru interior is nice to live with. It may also have better consumption in the city than the V6 Outlander. It has a sporty look, some stops with your kid to school and go to office. Sporty yet family minded Daily Car? Pero maintenance is still expensive not unless if you are coming from a European manufacturer.

    Weekend Drive/Special Occasions(Dates) - Mitsubishi Outlander
    Reasons - Fuel Efficient V6 is athletic. Elegant looking beast. Its a performer, stable as well. Its roomy, makes a good drive with your wife with the hot premium sound machine. Makes it a good lounge as well. You and your wife can go fishing at weekends with the handy tailgate of the outlander. Pero doesnt look like your a family minded person like the forester. Can also Track Car?

    I will buy the two if we have the money.
    - If we already have a daily car - Outlander
    - If we still dont have a daily car - Forester 2.0

  11. Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Posts
    2,380
    #11
    like the crv/forester thread...

    still performance over looks... forester parin

  12. Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Posts
    6,104
    #12
    Forester 2.5XT Turbo

  13. Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Posts
    2,421
    #13
    Quote Originally Posted by HyBrideVo View Post
    i like 'em both

    hbv, are you referring to you avatar?

  14. Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Posts
    1,619
    #14
    Quote Originally Posted by FXT View Post
    i like 'em both too.

    Are you referring to my avatar too?

    Stop staring at them will ya :evillaugh

  15. Join Date
    May 2004
    Posts
    77
    #15
    It's funny to note that the Subaru Forester was mentioned in a total of 51 separate threads and was directly compared with other vehicles here:
    03-15-2007 Subaru Forester vs Mitsubishi Outlander
    03-29-2007 Honda CR-V or Subaru Forester
    04-09-2007 Legacy Limited vs. Forester XT
    04-09-2007 Mazda6 2.3L or Subaru Forester 2.5XT
    02-25-2007 Hyundai Tucson 2.0CRDI VS Subaru 2.0 Forester XT
    10-24-2006 Impreza Sti vs. Forester Sti Video
    10-02-2006 nissan X-TRAIL vs honda CR-V vs subaru FORESTER
    09-26-2006 XTRAIL vs. FORESTER vs. ESCAPE vs. MONTERO SPORT
    12-10-2005 bat wala masyadong forester 2nd hand


  16. Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Posts
    65
    #16
    For a more objective assessment of the two vehicles, I suggest looking at this site:
    http://www.consumerreports.org/cro/c...507_suv_ov.htm

    Hope this would make this forum more informative and less emotional. I still root for the Forester because of the good handling, Mercedes-like ride as described in the March 2007 issue of C-Magazine, where they picked the Forester as its top 5-passenger compact SUV. Never fails me in a stop-light drag, especially on 2nd gear...

  17. Join Date
    Feb 2004
    Posts
    863
    #17
    If compared with the Forrester Turbo, I think I'd still go for the Outlander.

    Outlander looks nicer in and out (subjective), better ground clearance, more spacious interior, and cheaper by almost 200k.

    The Forrester will probably have better handling and feel but its not everything I guess.

  18. Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Posts
    866
    #18
    For me it doesn't matter

    As I've said in my earlier post, wala pa rin laban ang new CR-V sa mga ito.

    Noisy and high-vibrating 2.4 liter variant (using the old-school K24A engine), no standard 4WD/AWD on lower variants and the "slushbox" doesn't have manual mode (yet the Forester and New Outlander have these as standard equipment )

    Worst part is that the bucktooth grill is damn fugly.

    The CR-V is gonna be a boring vehicle for me (like it predecessor models)

  19. Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Posts
    2,421
    #19
    overall, i'd probably still pick the Forester XT over the Outlander, but the Outlander's 6-Speed Sportronic transmission with paddle shifters and 650 watts Rockford Fosgate sound system sure are ***y.

  20. Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Posts
    1,619
    #20
    If only they had the Mitsubishi Airtrek Turbo (outlander) here in the US i would have bought that over the Fozzie. Still i like 'em both newer and older versions





    Last edited by HyBrideVo; April 16th, 2007 at 10:17 AM.

Page 1 of 3 123 LastLast
Subaru Forester vs Mitsubishi Outlander