Results 11 to 20 of 22
-
November 2nd, 2010 11:28 PM #11
adventure ftw. mas solid ang feel ng adventure and the parts are easy to find since it has been out in the market for years now.
-
November 3rd, 2010 12:16 AM #12
Between the 2, sa adventure na ako. mas matipid sa fuel cost per kilometer, better parts availability.
-
Tsikoteer
- Join Date
- Apr 2008
- Posts
- 6,237
November 3rd, 2010 01:00 AM #13Between the two, Adventure ka nalang. The APV is gas so higher fuel costs and its only 1.6 so mahina siya. Small engine + big body= big time fuel consumption. But then kapag magaAdventure ka naman, Crosswind XT/XTi nalang.
-
November 3rd, 2010 08:54 AM #14
nahihirapan ako dito, Suzuki and Mitsu fanboy ako eh hehe.
all I can say, both are good cars in terms of reliability.
-
November 3rd, 2010 11:09 AM #15
-
November 3rd, 2010 11:13 AM #16
Adventure ako hirap kasi mag maintain ng under seat engine and nakakatakot mag drive ng walang hood
-
-
November 3rd, 2010 12:13 PM #18
^^^ itong 2 na ito ang magandang pag pilian. almost the same kasi.
non crdi, almsot the same seating. same seating capacity. same diesel engine displacement.
-
November 3rd, 2010 12:15 PM #19
Adventure pa rin ako, kung Crosswind XT lang naman.
Partida lang yung crosswind, naka projectors.
-
November 3rd, 2010 12:33 PM #20
Sige let me play devil's advocate - APV ako - it has the revered 1.6L vitara/escudo engine and is also quite roomy. Get the MT lang ( the AT sucks bigtime)
Somewhat expected from a rushed car from a first time carmaker
Xiaomi E-Car