Quote Originally Posted by guigui View Post
newer car isn't always synonymous to a better car. to tell you why: back then, if you want a long-lasting car, you'd get a euro car. but look at the euro cars today. inasmuch as i don't want to say bad things, try to look at a Benz that was made in the 70s and even beyond and compare it with a brand-new Mercedes Benz. then with the jap cars, take the example of honda cr-v. most hunters of cr-v prefers the 1st generation over the second and the third because of certain traits.

*Admin: sorry ot.
The first gen CR-V? Still thirsty for fuel, terrible B20 engine, cramped, small? That CR-V? Just because the second generation is an awful gas guzzler doesn't make the first gen any better than it actually is.

Quote Originally Posted by MrQ5 View Post
cheap version of cayenne Nissan Murano...
Nah. Murano's interior and handling are nowhere near Cayenne level. You want a "cheap" crossover that sort of drives like a Cayenne or X6, you're getting the CX9.