Honda's City and Jazz: Fuel Consumption

**niky** · November 19th, 2007 05:50 PM

Yup. Continuously Variable Transmission. No fixed gear ratios, no torque converter either. It gives you the economy of a manual and the ease of use of an automatic.

**utk505** · November 19th, 2007 06:34 PM

i hope meron pa jazz 1.5 mt next year (jan or feb ) thats the time i can buy the car

**wonderloo** · November 19th, 2007 09:50 PM

Originally Posted by niky

Yup. Continuously Variable Transmission. No fixed gear ratios, no torque converter either. It gives you the economy of a manual and the ease of use of an automatic.

Galing! Tlgang guru :D

hehehe...im considering the jazz 1.3 "CVT".
(Sna have 150k more to spare...)
teka, matignan nga wallet! nyahh!! hehehehe...

sorry, just talking to myself hehehehe...

**CVT** · November 19th, 2007 10:02 PM

Our 1.3L iDSI CVT Jazz is doing 12Km/L in city driving and 15Km/L in highway driving.....

4505:vader:

**CVT** · November 19th, 2007 10:04 PM

Originally Posted by claRkEnt

my City'05 (1.5CVT) gives minimum 15km/li. That data is for over 2-year period. It had been a habit to compute for my consumption everytime i fill up (always full tank whenever warning indicator lits up, whenever possible, same station same gas pump). The figure is for combined city and highway though di masyado traffic sa alabang area.

Bro.,- depende kasi sa oras ng pagpasok at pag-uwi iyan.....

4505:vader:

**zechs** · November 21st, 2007 10:21 AM

1.3 idsi city doing around 10kms/l

**ale828** · November 26th, 2007 01:02 PM

Originally Posted by wonderloo

hello.
i dont know how to drive manual transmission
kaya automatic ang need ko. wala ako choice.

guys, im thinking of getting a 2nd car
requirement is really fuel efficient, fuel consumption klm to liter is high.

ano mas matipid sa fuel?

a) 1.3 or 1.5?

b) tapos City ba or Jazz?

ako, matipid naman tumapak, 80 normally mabilis na.

thanks ah guys.
your posts tlga ang basis ng mga choices made dito sa forums.

1.3 is more fuel efficient
Jazz should be more fuel efficient because of less weight compared to the same spec city. but the difference is very small in 1-2% better fuel effiency lang.
If you don't need the trunk, the jazz is better, more versatile, slightly better resale, looks better too.

**Vmax** · November 29th, 2007 12:24 AM

I just bought a 1.3 with cvt transmission, still waiting for the licence plates to arrive. The transition from driving a Fortuner to the Jazz takes a lot of getting used to, engine response is slightly better than the SUV but the handling took me by surprise! I hope the Jazz will be as economical as advertized, bought the car so that my wife can have something to drive when I'm not around. Will keep you guys informed of it's performance in future post.

**C#@RD** · February 22nd, 2008 11:10 PM

Originally Posted by jjmichaels

Jazz 1.3 manual 28 kms/liter
Jazz 1.3 CVT 33 kms/liter

One of those Petron runs which we joined from Fort McDo Taguig to Petron Lipa Batangas.

totoo ba to?

In real day to day driving terms.

What's the Km/L for the

Jazz 1.3 Manual and Jazz 1.3 CVT?

**Type 100** · February 22nd, 2008 11:36 PM

2005 Honda Jazz 1.3S manual transmission
City driving: 11-14 km/L
Highway driving: 17-28 km/L

And I'm not pulling any of your legs. This is the real deal.