New and Used Car Talk Reviews Hot Cars Comparison Automotive Community

The Largest Car Forum in the Philippines

Page 3 of 3 FirstFirst 123
Results 21 to 28 of 28
  1. Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Posts
    198
    #21
    Quote Originally Posted by salsaman_60 View Post
    mitsubishi
    mura parts kaso malakas sa gas
    ang kunsumo ng gas ay depende sa size ng engine mo bro, at depende rin sa bigat ng paa mo.

  2. Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Posts
    222
    #22
    Quote Originally Posted by safeorigin View Post
    talagang nissan na nissan ka ha!!!

    ako naman mitsung mitsu kaso trip kong rides bimmer

    Hahahahaha! iba ksi nissan bro tested na ;)) kahit san mo dalhin kumbinsing kso assembly mga parts kaya mahal pero TIBAY!!!

  3. Join Date
    Oct 2002
    Posts
    15,528
    #23
    Quote Originally Posted by schumac View Post
    ako din help me choose between these two cars

    Honda ESi 1995 model 150k
    or
    Mitsubishi lancer GLi 1997 model (pizza pie) 150k

    pareho 1st own and makinis and maayos makina

    thanks sa mga magre reply
    for this, i would choose the mitsu lancer...newer model and lower maintenance.

    now back to the thread.. i think it would all boil down to the actual condition of the car. maski i-compare mo pa ang honda and toyota, everything will go back to the actual condition.

    now if it is a brand new car, probably, i'll get the mitsubishi. not just because i am biased with the brand with the three diamonds nor because i am a member of MMPH, it is because of the service and maintenance costs involved. and besides, mitsus now are better than the mitsus of let's say 5 years ago.
    Last edited by 1D4LV; August 23rd, 2007 at 09:41 AM.

  4. Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Posts
    42
    #24
    I will go with Mitsubishi lalo na pag mainit ang ulo ko the best syang i drive hehehe. Seriously speaking mahal talaga ang maintenance ng Honda pero kung sa porma naman siguro hindi nalalayo ang 2007 Lancer GT ko sa 2.0 ng Honda. Anyways choice mo parin yan good luck!


    Mike

  5. Join Date
    Jan 2003
    Posts
    2,407
    #25
    dun ako sa mas fresh na kotse. second hand na kasi eh.

  6. Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Posts
    44
    #26
    mitsubishi, mas matibay engine kesa honda. honda's interior is not as good as mitsu.

  7. Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Posts
    2,284
    #27
    We have owned both Honda and Mitsu, ok yung Honda pero pag luma na ang mahal na ng maintenance, yung Mitsu naman ang hina ng suspension IMO mas matibay pa suspension ng Sentra box type kahit ang dami nagrereklamo sa pang ilalim ng Nissan. Used our Sentra from 1990 to 1996 di kami nagpalit ng major underchassis parts, yung 95 na Lancer GLXi itlog body namin almost 3 years pa lang noon lahat ng pangilalim napalitan na!, Di din pwede sabihin na mas nilaspag yung Lancer kasi pareho naman yung ruta nun saka nung Sentra.

  8. Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Posts
    3,346
    #28
    Quote Originally Posted by ronw123w124 View Post
    We have owned both Honda and Mitsu, ok yung Honda pero pag luma na ang mahal na ng maintenance, yung Mitsu naman ang hina ng suspension IMO mas matibay pa suspension ng Sentra box type kahit ang dami nagrereklamo sa pang ilalim ng Nissan. Used our Sentra from 1990 to 1996 di kami nagpalit ng major underchassis parts, yung 95 na Lancer GLXi itlog body namin almost 3 years pa lang noon lahat ng pangilalim napalitan na!, Di din pwede sabihin na mas nilaspag yung Lancer kasi pareho naman yung ruta nun saka nung Sentra.
    +1 The suspension talaga is one of my lists na mahina sa Mitsubishi. Pero sabi ng Top Gear Philippines, the kalampag issue is now gone.

    iam3739.com

Page 3 of 3 FirstFirst 123
Honda or Mitsubishi