New and Used Car Talk Reviews Hot Cars Comparison Automotive Community

The Largest Car Forum in the Philippines

Results 1 to 12 of 12

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Posts
    257
    #1
    suggestion ko lang po. kung balak gamitin ni misis then better get an AT. kung laging isa or dalawa lng passenger then get a 1.3. kung laging loaded ang auto then 1.5.

  2. Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Posts
    371
    #2
    Quote Originally Posted by frequenzy View Post
    suggestion ko lang po. kung balak gamitin ni misis then better get an AT. kung laging isa or dalawa lng passenger then get a 1.3. kung laging loaded ang auto then 1.5.
    I'm also considering 1.3 G and 1.5G A/t.. My concern was primarily FC, it will be use on city and mostly 3 pax ang nakasakay.

  3. Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Posts
    257
    #3
    Quote Originally Posted by roelrpt View Post
    I'm also considering 1.3 G and 1.5G A/t.. My concern was primarily FC, it will be use on city and mostly 3 pax ang nakasakay.
    my FC on 1.3 MT 2nd gen, lageng dalawa lang kami ni misis. aggresive driving na yan.

    12km/l - pure city driving
    14-16km/l - highway driving

  4. Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Posts
    17,314
    #4
    Quote Originally Posted by roelrpt View Post
    I'm also considering 1.3 G and 1.5G A/t.. My concern was primarily FC, it will be use on city and mostly 3 pax ang nakasakay.
    If you can afford the 1.5G, go for it. The 1.5G A/T is what I'd consider to be an adequate car for city driving. The difference in power is significant, while the increase in fuel consumption is minimal, borderline 0 even.

    Of course, if you don't need the power, mas makakatipid ka sa 1.3G kasi mas mura yun. Kahit pareho lang ng FC, in the long run mas mura siya kasi mas konti yung nilabas mong pera for it.

  5. Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Posts
    371
    #5
    consider ko po advise nyo sir. salamat po..

  6. Join Date
    Aug 2004
    Posts
    22,702
    #6
    I agree... the 1.3 is not a good match to the AT. The 1.5, on the other hand, doesn't see as much fuel economy penalty with the AT... perhaps 0.5 km/l in mixed driving, from what I've observed.

    Ang pagbalik ng comeback...

  7. Join Date
    Oct 2002
    Posts
    6,385
    #7
    If you wanted max FC, it'd be the 1.3 MT. But then since that's not a choice, I'd go for the 1.5, your choice on the MT or AT. If it's mainly city driving, the AT should do. If you like opening it up on highways, then MT.

  8. Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Posts
    5,465
    #8
    I tried eco driving one time in light EDSA traffic.

    here's what I got:


    mine's 1.5G AT gen 2 2010 model.

    on my way home, on a typical after office hour traffic:


    it's significantly lower.

    Btw, that's ECO driving. On my normal driving habits, I could get as low as 8.5km/l and that's with a lot of brisk driving moments, overtaking etc. Normal 50/50 split hataw/eco mode could get me 10km/l easily.
    Last edited by basti08; June 13th, 2012 at 11:22 AM.

Fuel Consumption for Different Vios 2012 Variants