What's your take between the two in terms of fuel consumption, suspension, interiors, performance, etc?![]()
What's your take between the two in terms of fuel consumption, suspension, interiors, performance, etc?![]()
Matrix - Bigger Interior, Better FC sine Diesel and talking about performance... Its scary fast!
iam3739.com
matrix is bigger. but in terms of fuel efficiency, i think its a bit equal. mas mura nga lang ang per liter ng diesel.
but aesthetically, i still find the jazz beautiful. and plus, considering that it is a honda, better ang resale value nya.
They are two different vehicles, with the Jazz being a subcompact hatch - geared more towards a sportier ride and the Matrix as a microvan - more spacious, comfortable and has a stronger engine.
Fuel Consumption - My Matrix CRDI's fuel consumption is comparable to the Jazz 1.3l, but the Matrix has a more powerful low-end torque rated at 174lbs/ft.
Space - Matrix's interior space is quite comparable to CUV's.
Ride/Handling - Matrix absorbs bumps and potholes better but because of its height relative to its length and higher driving position, it has more body roll compared to the sportier Jazz. It depends on your priorities - comfort or performance?
When I chose the Matrix over the others, I was looking for a short, spacious and powerful "econobox." Something good for hauling, with a higher seating position and decent legroom/headroom.
If you're into subcompacts, why not take a look at the Accent CRDI and even the cheaper Getz CRDI as well? They'll feel speedier because they weigh 200+ kilos/440+ pounds lighter than the Matrix. They all come in manuals though.
riding comfrot i go for matrix...fuel efficiency matrix pa din...power performance hands down matrix...interior/exterior jazz...value for money...matrix,if you don't mind the resale value (which compensate to low maintenance, low fuel cost in long time use) matrix is the best choice...
[SIZE="3"][SIZE="3"]Jap made vehicle I think is still more durable.[/SIZE].[/SIZE]
That's because that's all he ever says. :hysterical:
-----
Matrix:
Pros:
- wider, airier feeling due to big windows.
- rear cabin power socket
- comes stock with luggage rack
- diesel power, fuel efficiency
- better riding, since, of course, it's a bigger and heavier vehicle
Cons:
- Hyundai resale value (which is offset by the fact that it's diesel, and diesel resale value is often better than gas)
- no automatic
- rubbery shifter
- easily scratched and kinda cheap looking plastics
Jazz
Pros:
- Terrific CVT
- Great fuel economy (for a gasoline engine)
- Great performance (in 1.5 form)
- Terrific handling, good control ergonomics
- ULT seats give best-in-class cargo-flexibility
Cons:
- Still not as big as the Matrix
- Stiff ride
- A bit expensive
- Rattling trim (varies)
- CVT sensitive to electrical changes
------
If I were being practical, Matrix. If I were to use this as a personal ride (solo only), Jazz 1.5 MT.
Ang pagbalik ng comeback...
The Jazz is more aesthetically refined, and more performance-oriented, while the Matrix is more utilitarian (though it would be better if Hyundai had a similar setup to Honda's ULT).
Naaaliw talaga ako sa Matrix. It runs on the same fuel as my ride, and has the same fuel capacity - but the similarity ends there. If I had to trade in my ride right now for a smaller car, I'd get a Matrix, with the added bonuses of CRDi and VGT. And the lack of an automatic doesn't bother me at all, being a fan of stick shifts.
There are a total of five production sites for the GD Fit/Jazz:
-Japan
-Brazil
-China
-Thailand
-Indonesia
Our Fit/Jazz here is from Thailand.
I think I still prefer the GD Fit/Jazz than the Matrix. Although I do admit that the Matrix CRDI is not bad either (when we tested it sa Macapagal Ave. for test drive).
any feedbacks?
Matrix owners out there?
how is fuel efficiency? how much is a 2006 model costs nowadays? i heard Hyundai removed this from the local line up. is parts easy to source and cheap? TIA hope to hear from you guys...
If you like to drive and don't mind the relative lack of grunt, the Jazz is your car. Whatever the Honda will lose in acceleration it will gain in corners.
Hyundai makes stonking turbodiesels (you can't argue with a Getz that does burnouts in 2nd gear, such is the torque) but they're not driver's cars just yet. Their chassis and suspensions still need work, I think.
Hyundai's suspension tuning, with the exception of the Santa Fe... sucks. Their light cars are under-damped. But the Matrix is heavier than the Getz or the Accent, so it should ride a bit more solidly than those two.
The Matrix is fine as a workaday vehicle, but the quality of the switchgear, steering and shifter leave something to be desired.
Parts availability? Unknown. The clutch (from the experience of numerous test-drives) might be a weak point, though (precisely because of the good torque), and if you're buying secondhand, you have to check for poor running or smoke-belching that might indicate the vehicle has been fed dirty diesel in the past.
Ang pagbalik ng comeback...
the mechanicals of the Matrix is impressive... instead of lowly struts or torsion beam at the back, Hyundai chose to shod it with multilinks. So, i think with proper tuning, it might be a good ride after all. Besides that, it got a wonderfully powerful motor, very roomy interior (roomier than the Jazz) and the spunky looks? well, love it or hate it. IMO, its just fine.
Baka kase may magbigay sa amin ng Matrix CRDi eh, we are just skeptical with maintenance. Hindi sa iniisip namen na sirain, baka lang kase mahirap humanap ng pyesa KUNG SAKALI na may masira. My auntie never had quality issues with her Starex so, mejo kampante naman kame kahit na HYUNDAI ang badge nya.
one more thing, would you pick it(a 2006 Matrix CRDi) over an older compact say, 01 Altis E/G or 01-02 Civic VTi/VTi-S (all matics)?