I've driven both Toyota Hiace and Nissan Urvan. Hiace Commuter and Urvan Shuttle 18-seater to be exact.
The URVAN:
strengths are - the A/C system cooling capability is high and suspension is comfortable for passengers..
- cheaper than a hiace
- has more seating caps than the commuter
Downsides are:
- the transmission needs a 6th gear especially when running the highways like SCTEX or NLEX. running at speeds over a hundred will cause the TEMP gauge to go higher than the normal operating temp.
- Noticeable loss of power and torque when climbing steep roads (you need to downshift a lot...)
- spare parts have honda-like prices
(ANG MAHAL)
Toyota Hiace:
Strengths are:
- Beefy engine (D4D and turbocharged) can make an urvan eat dust...
- SPACE is what this van is all about
- Cheap and available anytime spare parts (maybe not as cheap but cheaper than others)
- Nice ergonomics (I personally love how the steering wheel angle is set to be just like a sedan. Same goes for the location of the shifter. No need for too much arm movements from steering wheel to shifter.)
DOWNSIDES:
- Shaped like a box, or worse like a refrigerator...(but mind you, if you add bodykits it looks bada$$)
- seats are way too stiff. (a big problem for senior citizens who have back problems)
- rear suspension is a bit stiff...
- Front doors are too large aren't they?
