guys, im planning to buy a 2nd hand. could you give me a head to head comparison between the two cars, as to reliability, power, fuel consumption, etc.? thanks in advance.
guys, im planning to buy a 2nd hand. could you give me a head to head comparison between the two cars, as to reliability, power, fuel consumption, etc.? thanks in advance.
Originally Posted by conzky
corollas should have more available parts in the secondary market.
power and fuel consumption halos pareho lang yan. reliability, the corolla gets my vote assuming the car's well maintained.
Also, imo, the 95 corolla looks younger than the civic (and than it's successor the ae111)
Corolla GLi no question. It has just about the same performance as the Civic ESi, but more economical and with way more features like drink holders, split-fold rear seats, center console box, and if you chance upon a late 95 or younger model, there's already a driver's airbag. Also, the ESi's rear windows open only halfway (yuck!) as opposed to the GLi which open almost fully.
To be honest with you, the ESi has a better gearshift and driving position than the GLi. The Civic's engine is also revvier, but the Corolla has more useful torque for everyday driving. Looks wise, the Honda is slicker but the Toyota is more proportioned.
On reliability, both cars should fare excellently, but then again, Toyotas tend to be cheaper and easier to maintain with spare parts available just about everywhere. I also reckon the Corolla's suspension is designed more for our roads, compared to the Civic's sportier setting.
great stuff! ive been looking at these two cars for a possible purchase. may i ask your expert opinion guys on how these two compare with the 95 lancer glxi? its a possible third option.
I prefer corolla glio over honda... better performance at mas walang kalampag... you can test it.
Given both are in equal condition, the Corolla has aged better then the ESi... and in it's life span it is two years younger then the Esi when the model change was introduced (last model eyar was 1997-98 vs. 1995-1996 of the Esi).
This would be interesting. Both are great cars.
For my experience:
For the Esi, a fairly reliable ride, sportier looks, smoother (but still sporty) suspension, a little pricier to maintain. The power antenna is the extra "toy" it has over the Gli.
For the Gli, also a fairly reliable ride, less sporty looks, more rigid (sportier) suspension, less pricey to maintain.
Granting you find both models in fairly good maintained conditions, I think it would boil down to which design "tingles" you the most.![]()
But for me, I would choose the Esi.
Good luck in your pick!![]()
Last edited by Autobeat; October 18th, 2006 at 12:11 AM.