Results 1 to 10 of 15
-
March 12th, 2008 11:18 AM #1
Hi!
Need help on an objective comparison between the two to recommend to my boss. Just a pros and cons will do. I understand there's a +- Php 300,000 difference in price between the two. So he wants to know which is better.
Anyone?
TIA
-
March 12th, 2008 11:50 AM #2
well, i've been contemplating those two models for myself, along with audi's A3 TDi.
my conclusion is that if you're going to get one of the BMW's, then definitely go with the 320d. the 3-series is still pretty much the gold standard when it comes to sport sedans. and i'm sure it's resale value will hold up much better than the 1-series.
the 1-series really has gotten pretty poor reviews. it handles great, but the ride is supposedly terrible, the rear is pretty cramped. and it just looks weird.
if you wish to read a 1-series review by jeremy clarkson, then you can check this out: http://driving.timesonline.co.uk/tol...icle401596.ece
personally, the 3-series is the only BMW i would purchase since it is also the least Bangled of them all. but that's a personal opinion...
-
March 12th, 2008 12:54 PM #3
IMO.
I feel that the 320d is a better buy.
The 120d is good car... the acceleration is brutal, the steering & handling is nice, the seats are just ok (not as spacious as the Jazz, more like the Swift)... but it looks kinda iffy to me. The 3-door variant looks better though.
And with only 300K separating the two... that's reasonable enough.
__________________
bigbigcar.com Feature: BMW Dynamic Drive Experience
-
March 12th, 2008 01:48 PM #4
Thanks a mil for your replies quattro and mazdamazda.
I saw the Bimmer 120d in the flesh last night. Honestly, it looked a bit like the Honda Jazz parked right next to it . But seriously, the interior is a bit tight and to be able to fit golf sets, you'd have to fold the seats. My boss and his wife do out-of-town golf trips often. So, I guess, the 3 series wins here.
I haven't seen the 320ds yet. Are the engines identical? I also noticed the 120ds A/C controls are the analogue type and fit/finish is quite 'ordinary.' And the seats are fabric. I understand, the 320d sells quite a lot in Europe for fleet accounts and the 1-series are for entry-level BMW owner wanabees. So I guess there's not much to expect in terms of interiors, unless it's different here in the Philippines.
-
March 12th, 2008 02:21 PM #5
AFAIK, the 320d is marketed as more "upscale" here - am pretty sure it got the leather seats... will browse my 3-series brochure later this evening.
-
-
March 12th, 2008 06:04 PM #7
AFAIR - from the brochure there are some subtle differences between the 320i Sport & 320d. Will check it out later.
__________________
bigbigcar.com Feature: BMW Dynamic Drive Experience
-
March 12th, 2008 07:49 PM #8
The interior of the 3-series definitely FEELS more upmarket than the 120d. The 120d's seats and interior trim feel quite flimsy in comparison.
The 3 also rides much, much better, and has much more interior space. Handling is still great, though not as go-kart-ish as the 120d. The brakes on the 120d feel sharper because it's lighter, but the 3 brakes really well, as well.
BUT: I don't think the 320d comes in automatic. If that's important to the buyer, they might want to consider a 320i, instead.
Ang pagbalik ng comeback...
-
Verified Tsikot Member
- Join Date
- Sep 2007
- Posts
- 11
March 12th, 2008 08:11 PM #9
-
Tsikot Member Rank 3
- Join Date
- Feb 2004
- Posts
- 863
March 12th, 2008 10:31 PM #10I test drove a 320d not long ago and I remember it comes in A/T. I think its a nice sport sedan without the guilt of wasting too much on gas.
If the price difference is only about 300k, definitely go for a 320d nalang. But if you comparing say a 320d vs a 130i , even if the 1-series is more expensive, maybe its something worth thinking about hehe
Be cautious, and increase your tyres` lifetime with the programme of Tyre Awareness! Never miss a...
Tyre Awareness