2000 Honda CR-V or 2000 Mitsubishi Pajero Field Master

**take1bar** · November 19th, 2007 12:52 AM

cousin intends to buy, CRV or field master, both of them yr 2000 model. any suggestions and why? ty

**russpogi** · November 19th, 2007 12:58 AM

First, what is your cousin's purpose of getting the vehicle? People carrier? How many? Fuel efficiency? and the likes.

Personally, I recommend the Pajero. Why? Because:
it's diesel so it's cheaper to run
can carry up to 9 people
can hold up better on potholes and floods than the CR-V
I'm not a Honda fan. hehehe!

Hope this helps!

**niky** · November 19th, 2007 11:17 AM

Fieldmaster, hands down. Just check that the turbo is in good condition and that it doesn't eat oil.

It's got a smoother ride than the CR-V, it's diesel and it's bigger. The CRV is more agile, but that's all it has going for it.

**1D4LV** · November 19th, 2007 11:32 AM

fieldmaster din...

reasons:

a. diesel
b. more heavy-duty
c. bigger

**ronw123w124** · November 19th, 2007 01:36 PM

Fieldmaster din ako, pero kung girl ang gagamit mas bagay CRV.

**nitrox** · November 19th, 2007 01:57 PM

Fieldmaster din.

1. runs on cheaper diesel fuel
2. can carry heavier loads / more passengers vs CRV
3. more heavy-duty vs CRV

**ianmitsulancer** · November 19th, 2007 02:02 PM

Originally Posted by russpogi

First, what is your cousin's purpose of getting the vehicle? People carrier? How many? Fuel efficiency? and the likes.

Personally, I recommend the Pajero. Why? Because:
it's diesel so it's cheaper to run
can carry up to 9 people
can hold up better on potholes and floods than the CR-V
I'm not a Honda fan. hehehe!

Hope this helps!

the fieldmaster should be a good choice- regardless of 4x4 or 4x2 and since it is a 2000 modem the user can change the shock absorber setting to soft to make the ride smoother.