Results 11 to 14 of 14
-
Verified Tsikot Member
- Join Date
- Sep 2007
- Posts
- 13
October 24th, 2007 11:13 AM #11Sir, it depends, who you are and what you need?
Just like me , i have a Bimmer 2.0 V6 matic and a Lancer 1.5 GLX Manual
For my city driving i used the Lancer, for a long drive it must be a Bimmer. Why?
Well , based on my experience.
I went to Subic, with my Lancer, filled it up, P1,000 XCS, back in manila, ubos, with traffic in Lubao. Ikot lang sa loob ng Subic Bay
Same venue, Subic with my Bimmer, P1,000 XCS. back in manila may tira pa with traffic in Lubao. Ikot lang sa loob ng Subic Bay, same routine, take note its a V6 na Matic
So 2.0L mas tipid sa hatawan, kaysa sa 1.5L. Kasi sa 2.0L konting tapak lang sibat na, especially sa overtaking, unlike sa 1.5L, pedal to metal na todo na tapak mo, kinakapos pa sa hatak. Bitin sa hatawan.
-
Tsikot Member Rank 4
- Join Date
- Oct 2002
- Posts
- 1,842
October 24th, 2007 11:40 AM #12Our 03 CRV (RIP) 2.0 Consumes 10 to 12 km per liter w/ manual transmission
Our 1300cc Jimny A/T goes 8km per liter.
-
October 24th, 2007 02:52 PM #13
dapat ata ang comparison ay same car brand with different displacement para medyo accurate.
-
October 25th, 2007 04:18 PM #14
Yup.
Actually, on the highway, a 1.5 liter engine of the same generation of technology as a similar 2.0 engine (carburator versus carburator, EFI versus EFI or direct ignition versus direct ignition) will drink less gas, as long as you drive it at economical revs.
But if you drive it expecting the same speed as with a 2.0, it'll suck gas like crazy, as it has to work harder to accelerate in the same manner.
Ang pagbalik ng comeback...
Be careful with channels like "China Observer" on YouTube. There is a clear bias in their posts and...
Xiaomi E-Car