Kakabukas ko lang ng pc ko, napansin ko na ni-lock nung Moderator yung thread ko tungkol kay "Inday in Uniform". I'm not exactly sure what his reasons were for preventing other people from making further opinions. If there are some posters who "appeared" to be making personal attacks, they were censured and in fact, they volunteered not to post anymore. So I'm not sure why there is a need to lock the thread.
Pardon my views, but i think the posts made about "Inday in Uniform" were heated, but I don't think anybody posted anything that can be classified as "motivated personal attack" against anybody. Some threads before were even more vicious, like those related to Pro-GMA versus Anti-GMA, but they were not locked. People simply lost interest in the thread. But here, some people are still exchanging views among themselves and suddenly the discussion was locked.
I find that too MARCOSIAN. Is it because there are moderators who have uniformed maids and the subject was getting too hot for comfort for them? Ganyan din ginawa ni Gloria Arroyo when she attempted to close down the media because the discussion was too hot for her comfort. So where is Freedom of Speech here?
Again, it's one thing to ask people to tone down their views. It's another thing to totally shut down an ongoing discussion to prevent people from posting any further. The first one is "moderated" discussion. The latter is "martial law".




Reply With Quote
