Uber and Grab no more? LTFRB needs brains

**BratPAQ** · July 18th, 2017 02:36 PM

Originally Posted by radz15

The main argument based on LTFRB ay dapat ma regulate ang uber/grab due to SAFETY of the passengers. Kaya andaming nag rarant sa mga social media sites dahil pinapalabas ng LTFRB na mas SAFE ang taxis, bus, fx, jeepneys dahil regulated sila. Isa pa sa sinasabi ng spokesperson ng LTFRB na dapat may Financial capacity ang operator ng Uber/Grab incase may accident na mangyari para may pambayad sila. Mukang hindi nag reresearch ang mga ugok na taga LTFRB. May insurance ang uber/grab Incase ma aksidente ang pasahero nito.

Sent from my H220 using Tapatalk

Lahat ng pasahero in all units of Uber and Grab are covered by insurance? Remind me, ano nga reason bakit ayaw tumanggap ng bagong franchise ang LTFRB.

Sent from my SM-G955F using Tapatalk

**uls** · July 18th, 2017 02:40 PM

Originally Posted by leonleon

Parang nauna Grab.

Wala pa Uber noon, may Grabtaxi na.

App based booking, though yung App nila hindi distributed to the people.

Grab employees lang may App, and they'll do the booking for you in their booths sa mga malls.

well i'm not interested in Grab

so i didn't bother to read up on its history

i'm only interested in unicorns (companies with more than $10B valuation that haven't gone public yet -- meaning they're still privately held)

like Uber, Didi Chuxing, Airbnb etc

**minicarph** · July 18th, 2017 03:31 PM

Originally Posted by uls

i didnt bother to research who founded Grab and what his/her philiosophy is

obviously Grab copied Uber's business model

grab nya concept

**minicarph** · July 18th, 2017 03:36 PM

Originally Posted by _Qwerty_

May point si James Deakin.. pano kung gawing private and membership only ang Grab and Uber? May annual membership fee na consumable pag gumamit ka.. so mapapakailaman pa din ba sila nang LTFRB pag ganon ang setup??

hindi na kasi mag fa fall na yan sa membership law

**_Qwerty_** · July 18th, 2017 03:37 PM

so dapat ganon na lang gawin nila.. para wala nang problema sa LTRFB..

Originally Posted by minicarph

hindi na kasi mag fa fall na yan sa membership law

**minicarph** · July 18th, 2017 03:45 PM

ang problema sa membership fixed rate monthly

**_Qwerty_** · July 18th, 2017 03:47 PM

they could go around it, make it annual membership and amount is consumable.. like 5T for 1 year consumable..

Originally Posted by minicarph

ang problema sa membership fixed rate monthly

**unmarked** · July 18th, 2017 05:24 PM

to be clear ung colorum na uber and grab lang ang huhulihin, and that the LTFRB is accusing the two companies of deliberately telling these colorum drivers to go on and take passengers kahit hindi sila officially granted ng prankisa.

Now if you are one of those colorum and mahuli ka sa akto, I highly doubt tutulungan ka ni uber/grab sa pang bayad mo ng multa, so this is where LTFRB is claiming how the two companies found themselves in a mess that they started, putting the drivers and operators at risk, syempre bitin sa kita since tinanggap nila tapos may huli pala.

If the requirements LTFRB is asking para maka grant ng new franchises ay fair or not I dont know rin, but the fact that the public support is huge sana they can find a compromise.

I could care less about them taxis. Never sila naki cooperate, Never nag improve, Never their fault, always the victim.

**rudy_corolla** · July 18th, 2017 05:47 PM

daming colorum na PUVs di naman hinuhuli ng LTFRB, kung manghuli man, ningas cogon lang. Mga colorum na bus 1M ang multa pero ano nang nangyari? Ilan ba ang tauhan nila? I'm sure magsa-sampol lang yan ng huhulihing TNVS tapos wala na. Malas nga lang ng mahuhuli

**makinao** · July 18th, 2017 06:47 PM

Until now, the LTFRB vs Uber/Grab controversy has been an administration vs private sector showdown. Patigasan ng ulo. But politics changes all that. So grab your popcorn and enjoy the show.

Ejercito hits LTFRB for stopping Grab, Uber 'that provide better services' | Inquirer News