Results 11 to 20 of 52
-
February 17th, 2016 09:00 AM #11
Rather than pass this on to the consumers, why not make this a mandatory feature for all vehicles and make this a built in part of the vehicle's safety system.
Sure, the cost will be passed on in the vehicle retail price but the economies of scale will make the cost of an individual dash cam far more cheaper than if the consumers will buy this directly.
Even MB is toying with, or already has some built in, cam/FLIR system for their vehicles already. Other vehicles have all around cams already to assist in parking.
Last edited by 111prez; February 17th, 2016 at 09:05 AM.
-
Tsikoteer
- Join Date
- Jun 2012
- Posts
- 4,447
February 17th, 2016 09:01 AM #12
-
February 17th, 2016 09:08 AM #13
Impossible to have a monopoly. There are so many suppliers and so many multiple avenues for importation that you can always get the same thing cheaper if you hunt around.
They might be able to word the regulations so that they can exclude the cheap-ass cameras... but it will be difficult to create an exclusive regulation set that favors only one supplier.
-
They could make business selling dashcams outside the LTO offices, but you can't sell them inside.
Feature bloat. A dashcam installed as standard equipment means they'll charge you for the cam and then charge you for the warranty and whatever add-on value... but it's definitely possible.
Ang pagbalik ng comeback...
-
Verified Tsikot Member
- Join Date
- Oct 2006
- Posts
- 6,246
February 17th, 2016 09:26 AM #14
-
February 17th, 2016 09:40 AM #15
How can the LTO compel jeepney drivers to use dashcams that will draw power from their jeepney batteries? These drivers don't even switch on their headlamps at night.
-
-
February 17th, 2016 10:07 AM #17
Reality check: P1T - P1.5T is not cheap for the public utility driver. Sa mga Tsikoteers dito, yakang yaka yan.
Operators perhaps but again, they will pass this cost on to their drivers/lessees in terms of higher boundary rates.
-
February 17th, 2016 10:14 AM #18
-
February 17th, 2016 10:41 AM #19
gumagamit na ko.
More than a year ko na ginagamit SJ4K ko, as helmet cam pag nakamotor ako at as dashcam pag sasakyan gamit ko.
- - -
regarding sa mga PUVs, madalas mga toda sa amin ang nakukuhanan ko pag Sundays. Ginagawa kasi ng DPWH ang portion ng kalsada samin kaya panay counterflow mga tricycle. Tututukan ko at hindi ako tatabi (parang yung sa post sa TGP). Maya-maya bubungisngis na ang driver kasi kita nya ang dashcam ko. Meron pa nga nagtakip ng panyo sa mukha. Pinapadala ko kasi mga screenshot sa fb page ng LGU namin. Pinapatawag nila ang mga driver sa POSD para magseminar. hahaha
-
February 17th, 2016 10:52 AM #20
i would agree on this. kaya nga lang may enforcement and compliance loopholes lalo na sa mga PUVs.
Also non-repairable na ata ung gulong pag ginamitan ng tire sealant
Liquid tire sealant