According to a recent medical research paper, Viagra might give athletes a performance boost.
Do you consider this doping? Should this be illegal? How can they tell the difference between legit use and doping?
According to a recent medical research paper, Viagra might give athletes a performance boost.
Do you consider this doping? Should this be illegal? How can they tell the difference between legit use and doping?
depende ang classification neto kung doping eh. normally, doping is for long-term, pero kung viagra lang, mukhang panandalian lang ang effect.
and besides, imagine someone running a sprint with a raging boner in front of him. or swimming a 100 meter backstroke with something like a shark-fin protroding in front of him.
i don't know, i guess it would be best for the governing bodies to classify this.
medyo OT: AFAIK, di naman ume-effect ang viagra sa taong may normal erection...
hence, di rin ito eeffect sa "normal" patient, pwera na lang kung may dysfunction yung gagamit...
Ang labo naman. Athlete but can't get a ... Aren't athletes supposed to be physically superior?
my post in the other thread made mention about ***ual excitement in relation to erection. hence, the use of viagra is just nothing but an overkill...it's all in the brain.
there was one conversation of women when i happened to eavesdrop that viagra's claim isn't true. her hubby had been taking it to enhance his (churvah). but one night wife placed her ponstan sf near the untaken viagra. hubby took the ponstan instead but wife claimed that hubby yielded that same primal energy...he performed the way he did in the previous nights when he was taking viagra.
answering the primary question, i guess, it's not doping but it's use should be regulated. why should athletes need to increase cardiac activity when they're into physical strain already. cardiac overload yan, malamang. tigok.
so di naman cguro totoo...IMO![]()
Last edited by ab_initio; December 17th, 2008 at 05:48 PM.
*hence, the use of viagra is just nothing but an overkill...it's all in the brain.![]()
ma'am ab_initio
OT: i think may therapeutic effect talaga ang viagra for dysfunction especially for old people kasi kapag tumatanda ang tao maraming factors ang dahilan kaya nagkakaroon ng erectile dysfunction (e.g. Neurogenic Disorders, hormonal disorders, side-effects from some medications for other diseases, etc.). ung viagara, na may active constituent na Sildenafil citrate na nagpaparelease ng Nitric oxide (NO) na nagiincrease ng level ng cyclic guanosine monophosphate (cGMP) that may lead vasodilation ng helicine arteries kaya nakakadaan yung blood that may lead to erection.
pasensya na masyadong maraming technical terms. future pharmacist (pharmacy student) here.
it's not doping.
when it's doping, it's illegal.
in the case of viagra, it is supposedly a regulated drug. meaning this can only be dispensed when it's prescribed. its sale without prescription becomes illegal. for the consumer, he assumes the risk when he takes viagra without adequate prescription, but it's not doping.
there's doping when what has been passed is a prohibited article. then that's illegal.
legitimate use therefore may be looked into by knowing its classification.
IMO lang po.![]()