T3 is just ok for the casual buyer but I find their reviews lacking.
For example, their Canon 450D review... they bannered it in the front page that it'll be scrutinized and all and upon checking it out it only consists of a few paragraphs.
Though there are a few good short reviews (like for the earphones) there but the photoshoot with models is a waste of ink. If they want to shoot models, they should use the camera that they are reviewing to make it more realistic.
It's too casual really... online magazines and review sites offer a much better perspective.
We used to patronize Gadgets, until most of the staff broke off and put up their own publication, Speed. It was a moral dilemma; do we switch to the new magazine with the familiar staff members, or do we stick with the old mag who's owned by our ninang?
For some time now, we've been avid readers of HWM; their consistently glowing reviews of the Lumix line was the reason we bought an FX-07 digicam. We also periodically subscribe to PC Buyer's Guide.
The information I get from those, I supplement with review sites. And I have a habit of digging for reviews on stuff that we already have, just to see how other people find them.
agree po ako ke mazda... for me pang casual reading lang ang T3. Minsan me nakukuhang good info minsan parang bitin. enjoy din ako reading ung mga regular columnist nila. one is yung ksama sa banda ng radioactive active sago at ung isa ung medyo matanda na?