New and Used Car Talk Reviews Hot Cars Comparison Automotive Community

The Largest Car Forum in the Philippines

Page 185 of 210 FirstFirst ... 85135175181182183184185186187188189195 ... LastLast
Results 3,681 to 3,700 of 4196
  1. Join Date
    Nov 2005
    Posts
    45,927
    #3681
    the b i d e n admin is weaponizing the state to go after their number 1 opponent in the upcoming election

    their goal is to make trump not run

    this kind of dirty politics only happens in underdeveloped countries but its happening in U S A

  2. Join Date
    May 2017
    Posts
    2,135
    #3682
    California Bill Would Punish Parents For Misgendering Children

    California Bill Would Punish Parents For Misgendering Children | ZeroHedge


    Proposed by Democratic Assemblymember Lori Wilson and state Senator Scott Weiner (who last year suggested "offering Drag Queen 101 as part of the K-12 curriculum, introduced a bill that grants judicial leniency to certain pedophiles, and who was accused of a hate-crime hoax), AB957 amends the state Family Code addressing the "health, safety and welfare of the child" in every household.

    As the Daily Mail notes, if passed, the law could result in children being removed from their parents' home if family members are deemed 'anti-LGBTQ+.'



  3. Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Posts
    12,398
    #3683
    California already made it illegal for employees to stop shoplifters stealing their merchandise. Imagine if that happens in the Philippines.

    Bill to Stop Employees Confronting Shoplifters Passed by California Senate

    I don't know if it'll happen in AZ. If it does? I'm moving all my funds to the PH and spending it there.
    Last edited by Jun aka Pekto; June 12th, 2023 at 10:20 AM.

  4. Join Date
    Oct 2002
    Posts
    21,433
    #3684
    Quote Originally Posted by Athrunzala View Post
    California Bill Would Punish Parents For Misgendering Children

    California Bill Would Punish Parents For Misgendering Children | ZeroHedge


    Proposed by Democratic Assemblymember Lori Wilson and state Senator Scott Weiner (who last year suggested "offering Drag Queen 101 as part of the K-12 curriculum, introduced a bill that grants judicial leniency to certain pedophiles, and who was accused of a hate-crime hoax), AB957 amends the state Family Code addressing the "health, safety and welfare of the child" in every household.

    As the Daily Mail notes, if passed, the law could result in children being removed from their parents' home if family members are deemed 'anti-LGBTQ+.'


    New borns should be called "theybies"
    Signature

  5. Join Date
    Nov 2010
    Posts
    25,276
    #3685
    Quote Originally Posted by Jun aka Pekto View Post
    California already made it illegal for employees to stop shoplifters stealing their merchandise. Imagine if that happens in the Philippines.

    Bill to Stop Employees Confronting Shoplifters Passed by California Senate

    I don't know if it'll happen in AZ. If it does? I'm moving all my funds to the PH and spending it there.
    It's not a law yet. Also, the proposed law actually makes sense somehow.

    "SB 553 is focused on protecting employees. The bill does not prohibit employees from stopping theft. It does prevent employers from asking non-security personnel to confront a person involved in criminal activity. We don't want rank and file employees to be forced to place themselves in harm's way.

    The California bill, if enacted in law, would require employers to provide active-shooter training to workers, keep a log of any violent incidents, and allow companies to apply for workplace violence restraining orders.

    SB 553 is not targeted at—and does not affect—trained security guards. In fact, the bill highlights the need for dedicated safety personnel."
    The bill should be read and understood in it's proper context.

  6. Join Date
    Oct 2002
    Posts
    21,433
    #3686
    Quote Originally Posted by Ry_Tower View Post
    It's not a law yet. Also, the proposed law actually makes sense somehow.



    The bill should be read and understood in it's proper context.
    Mag lagay na din kasi sila ng mga security guards like here in the Phils., dagdag employment na din sa US.
    Signature

  7. Join Date
    May 2017
    Posts
    2,135

  8. Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Posts
    54,631
    #3688
    ... from the country that espouses the right to bear arms...?

  9. Join Date
    Nov 2010
    Posts
    25,276
    #3689
    Quote Originally Posted by boybi View Post
    Mag lagay na din kasi sila ng mga security guards like here in the Phils., dagdag employment na din sa US.
    Yes, and also roaming guards in plain clothes inside just to add to security measures. Lessens small-time thiefs and can assists the guards in case of rowdy criminals and if there are more than 1 perpetrators.

  10. Join Date
    Oct 2002
    Posts
    21,433
    #3690
    Yan problema sa US, too much freedom.

    Switzerland din naman gives its citizens the right to bear arms, pero walang ganyan, walang barilan.
    Signature

  11. Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Posts
    12,398
    #3691
    Quote Originally Posted by Ry_Tower View Post
    It's not a law yet. Also, the proposed law actually makes sense somehow.



    The bill should be read and understood in it's proper context.
    Who is regarded as a safety personnel? The cops? They can't do crap. First of all, they can't arrest any shoplifter who steals less than $950 worth of merchandise. The cops can't even respond to many calls.

  12. Join Date
    Nov 2005
    Posts
    45,927
    #3692


    Original story below:

    If Batman and Robin are looking for side gigs, they might want to avoid job-seeking at Lululemon. Crimefighters need not apply, according to two recently fired employees from an Atlanta store.

    Former assistant manager Jennifer Ferguson and worker Rachel Rogers say that they were canned by Lululemon corporate after they verbally confronted three masked men who were robbing the Peachtree Corners store.

    In a video that has since gone viral, masked men are seen grabbing armfuls of Lululemon gear and carrying the loot out to a waiting car. As they come back for more, Ferguson can be heard saying, "No, no, no, you can march back out."

    The thieves, who had reportedly pulled this off nearly a dozen times before, go back in for more anyway, and after spouting a few expletives at the workers, they take off for good. Ferguson and Rogers called the Gwinnett Police Department in the moments that followed and the thieves were eventually captured and charged with felony robbery.

    You might imagine that the employees were given praise or a raise or at least a complimentary pair of yoga pants by the retail company, but they received pretty much the opposite: their walking papers.

  13. Join Date
    Nov 2005
    Posts
    45,927
    #3693
    to make sense of what california is doing you have to understand the ideology

    california is run by left-leaning ideologues

    left meaning red as in anti-capitalist (the oppressors) red, pro-poor (people of color specially blacks -- the oppressed)

    Last edited by uls; June 12th, 2023 at 02:55 PM.

  14. Join Date
    Nov 2005
    Posts
    45,927
    #3694
    the leftist view is that capitalists corner most of the nation's wealth resulting in large number of poor people

    the decriminalization of shoplifting is basically the leftist government telling the oppressed "go take what you're owed"

    wala pa yan

    there's a lot more insanity is coming

  15. Join Date
    Nov 2010
    Posts
    25,276
    #3695
    Quote Originally Posted by Jun aka Pekto View Post
    Who is regarded as a safety personnel? The cops? They can't do crap. First of all, they can't arrest any shoplifter who steals less than $950 worth of merchandise. The cops can't even respond to many calls.
    Security guards or even grocery personnel trained by security agencies but in plain clothes that can roam malls and groceries to check up on small-time thiefs. Those are what I am saying as possible back-up of uniformed security guards. That is what the bill is asking.

    What law in any US state specifically says that cops can't arrest people who steal $950 worth or merchandise? Kindly enlighten me. I'd love to read up on that law.

  16. Join Date
    Nov 2005
    Posts
    45,927
    #3696
    Will Business Fight Back? | City Journal

    The decriminalization of retail theft in cities across the country has taken place amid a long-term nationwide increase in shoplifting. The U.S. Chamber of Commerce now is calling for help from the federal government, but a more efficient way to protect businesses exists—if prosecutors and officials will follow it.

    Officials in Los Angeles, San Francisco, Baltimore, Chicago, and Philadelphia have either explicitly told police not to arrest people for shoplifting or have systematically declined to prosecute the charges. Progressive politicians have assured the public that shoplifting is not on the rise, but high-profile videos—a man on a bike in California pedaling out of a drug store with a bag full of stolen loot, organized crews in New York targeting upscale stores—suggest criminals have gotten the message that they can steal with impunity.

    Statistics corroborate these accounts. The National Retail Federation, which represents large national chains, reported that 75 percent of its members have experienced increased retail thefts recently. Shoplifting is costing these stores an average of $719,548 per $1 billion in sales. Small shops, from mom-and-pops to neighborhood bodegas, have been hit even harder. A survey from business.org found that daily shoplifting nearly doubled from 2020 to 2021, and that almost 90 percent of stores have experienced some shoplifting, with clothing and electronics among the most popular items stolen and almost one-quarter of stores experiencing shoplifting daily.

  17. Join Date
    May 2017
    Posts
    2,135
    #3697


    LGBTQ Friendly Church Struck By Lightning & BURNS DOWN, Snopes Hilariously Fact Checks Story

  18. Join Date
    Nov 2010
    Posts
    25,276
    #3698
    Quote Originally Posted by uls View Post
    That's not a law. I am asking for a law because someone said cops can't arrest. There's a difference between can't and won't.

  19. Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Posts
    12,398
    #3699
    Quote Originally Posted by Ry_Tower View Post
    That's not a law. I am asking for a law because someone said cops can't arrest. There's a difference between can't and won't.
    Law or not, that's what we're facing here. We already have laws in place. If they're not being followed, what makes you think this new proposal will be? It's fine if the lawlessness stays at the source. But, there's always the chance it'll cross state lines.

    Also, there are shortages of police after all that "Defund the Police" stuff. The cops don't have the manpower required for full coverage of their jurisdiction and there aren't many new ones willing to work for those cities. Can't or won't is pretty much academic. There are simply no cops who can respond in time.
    Last edited by Jun aka Pekto; June 12th, 2023 at 11:31 PM.

  20. Join Date
    Nov 2010
    Posts
    25,276
    #3700
    Quote Originally Posted by Jun aka Pekto View Post
    Law or not, that's what we're facing here. We already have laws in place. If they're not being followed, what makes you think this new proposal will be? It's fine if the lawlessness stays at the source. But, there's always the chance it'll cross state lines.

    Also, there are shortages of police after all that "Defund the Police" stuff. The cops don't have the manpower required for full coverage of their jurisdiction and there aren't many new ones willing to work for those cities. Can't or won't is pretty much academic. There are simply no cops who can respond in time.
    Agree there's a problem. But what I am saying is that the issue is not with the letter of the law. It's with the DA.

    Fact-check: California Prop 47 $95 shoplifting claim | verifythis.com

    Since you won't provide the details, I researched it and indeed it's still not permitted. It's not a felony but it's a misdemeanor charge but it does carry a hefty fine.

    Better put law-enforcing DA's then instead of woke prosecutors.

    However, this new proposal imho can give retail owners- at least those big enougn to afford- a chance to hire, again, trained security personnel. Here in the Philippines, some mall owners and grocery stores have roaming plain-clothes security men that detect shoplifters. In that way they have some fighting chance to reduce business losses due to shoplifting. The new proposal just makes sure that retailers can't just put anyone as security personnel, they must have trained individuals that will handle these shoplifters

    Better have them when you need them rather need them and not have them. If the local government won't help, business owners better think of the solution themselves as boybi pointed out. Plus if shoplifters turn violent, then aggravated assault won't be just a misdemeanor act, that'll be a felony.

    Sent using Tsikot Forums mobile app
    Fasten your seatbelt! Or else... Driven To Thrill!

Tags for this Thread

US Politics